From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3*: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:10:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215201008.15235-1-nm@ti.com> (raw)
Hi,
This series was triggered by the discussion in [1], and we realized we
need to cleanup the definitions in K3 SoC. Usage of kvm with gic-v2
compatibility is a bit niche usecase, but valid and possible with A53
and A72 even though the GIC500 instantiation is done with no backward
compatibility.
Nishanth Menon (5):
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2.dtsi | 1 +
10 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87k0e0tirw.wl-maz@kernel.org/
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3*: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:10:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215201008.15235-1-nm@ti.com> (raw)
Hi,
This series was triggered by the discussion in [1], and we realized we
need to cleanup the definitions in K3 SoC. Usage of kvm with gic-v2
compatibility is a bit niche usecase, but valid and possible with A53
and A72 even though the GIC500 instantiation is done with no backward
compatibility.
Nishanth Menon (5):
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-main.dtsi | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2.dtsi | 1 +
10 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87k0e0tirw.wl-maz@kernel.org/
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 20:10 Nishanth Menon [this message]
2022-02-15 20:10 ` [PATCH 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3*: Fix gic-v3 compatible regs Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: " Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: " Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: " Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: " Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721s2: " Nishanth Menon
2022-02-15 20:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-02-16 9:16 ` [PATCH 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3*: " Marc Zyngier
2022-02-16 9:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-02-22 19:31 ` Nishanth Menon
2022-02-22 19:31 ` Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220215201008.15235-1-nm@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.