All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	pihsun@chromium.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: mtk_rpmsg: Fix circular locking dependency
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:08:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217160851.GA474184@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b531eeca-40e8-d759-5579-59567eb5af84@collabora.com>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:06:22PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/01/22 15:47, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> > During execution of the worker that's used to register rpmsg devices
> > we are safely locking the channels mutex but, when creating a new
> > endpoint for such devices, we are registering a IPI on the SCP, which
> > then makes the SCP to trigger an interrupt, lock its own mutex and in
> > turn register more subdevices.
> > This creates a circular locking dependency situation, as the mtk_rpmsg
> > channels_lock will then depend on the SCP IPI lock.
> > 
> > [   18.014514]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > [   18.014515]        CPU0                    CPU1
> > [   18.014517]        ----                    ----
> > [   18.045467]   lock(&mtk_subdev->channels_lock);
> > [   18.045474]                                lock(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > [   18.228399]                                lock(&mtk_subdev->channels_lock);
> > [   18.228405]   lock(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > [   18.264405]
> > 
> > To solve this, simply unlock the channels_lock mutex before calling
> > mtk_rpmsg_register_device() and relock it right after, as safety is
> > still ensured by the locking mechanism that happens right after
> > through SCP.
> > Notably, mtk_rpmsg_register_device() does not even require locking.
> > 
> > Fixes: 7017996951fd ("rpmsg: add rpmsg support for mt8183 SCP.")
> > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> 
> Friendly ping for an important fix... :)
>

This seems to have slipped through the cracks...  I will take a look later
today.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> > ---
> >   drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > index 5b4404b8be4c..d1213c33da20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,9 @@ static void mtk_register_device_work_function(struct work_struct *register_work)
> >   		if (info->registered)
> >   			continue;
> > +		mutex_unlock(&subdev->channels_lock);
> >   		ret = mtk_rpmsg_register_device(subdev, &info->info);
> > +		mutex_lock(&subdev->channels_lock);
> >   		if (ret) {
> >   			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't create rpmsg_device\n");
> >   			continue;
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno  <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	pihsun@chromium.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: mtk_rpmsg: Fix circular locking dependency
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:08:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217160851.GA474184@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b531eeca-40e8-d759-5579-59567eb5af84@collabora.com>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:06:22PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/01/22 15:47, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> > During execution of the worker that's used to register rpmsg devices
> > we are safely locking the channels mutex but, when creating a new
> > endpoint for such devices, we are registering a IPI on the SCP, which
> > then makes the SCP to trigger an interrupt, lock its own mutex and in
> > turn register more subdevices.
> > This creates a circular locking dependency situation, as the mtk_rpmsg
> > channels_lock will then depend on the SCP IPI lock.
> > 
> > [   18.014514]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > [   18.014515]        CPU0                    CPU1
> > [   18.014517]        ----                    ----
> > [   18.045467]   lock(&mtk_subdev->channels_lock);
> > [   18.045474]                                lock(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > [   18.228399]                                lock(&mtk_subdev->channels_lock);
> > [   18.228405]   lock(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > [   18.264405]
> > 
> > To solve this, simply unlock the channels_lock mutex before calling
> > mtk_rpmsg_register_device() and relock it right after, as safety is
> > still ensured by the locking mechanism that happens right after
> > through SCP.
> > Notably, mtk_rpmsg_register_device() does not even require locking.
> > 
> > Fixes: 7017996951fd ("rpmsg: add rpmsg support for mt8183 SCP.")
> > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> 
> Friendly ping for an important fix... :)
>

This seems to have slipped through the cracks...  I will take a look later
today.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> > ---
> >   drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > index 5b4404b8be4c..d1213c33da20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,9 @@ static void mtk_register_device_work_function(struct work_struct *register_work)
> >   		if (info->registered)
> >   			continue;
> > +		mutex_unlock(&subdev->channels_lock);
> >   		ret = mtk_rpmsg_register_device(subdev, &info->info);
> > +		mutex_lock(&subdev->channels_lock);
> >   		if (ret) {
> >   			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't create rpmsg_device\n");
> >   			continue;
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	pihsun@chromium.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: mtk_rpmsg: Fix circular locking dependency
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:08:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217160851.GA474184@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b531eeca-40e8-d759-5579-59567eb5af84@collabora.com>

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 05:06:22PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/01/22 15:47, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> > During execution of the worker that's used to register rpmsg devices
> > we are safely locking the channels mutex but, when creating a new
> > endpoint for such devices, we are registering a IPI on the SCP, which
> > then makes the SCP to trigger an interrupt, lock its own mutex and in
> > turn register more subdevices.
> > This creates a circular locking dependency situation, as the mtk_rpmsg
> > channels_lock will then depend on the SCP IPI lock.
> > 
> > [   18.014514]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> > [   18.014515]        CPU0                    CPU1
> > [   18.014517]        ----                    ----
> > [   18.045467]   lock(&mtk_subdev->channels_lock);
> > [   18.045474]                                lock(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > [   18.228399]                                lock(&mtk_subdev->channels_lock);
> > [   18.228405]   lock(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
> > [   18.264405]
> > 
> > To solve this, simply unlock the channels_lock mutex before calling
> > mtk_rpmsg_register_device() and relock it right after, as safety is
> > still ensured by the locking mechanism that happens right after
> > through SCP.
> > Notably, mtk_rpmsg_register_device() does not even require locking.
> > 
> > Fixes: 7017996951fd ("rpmsg: add rpmsg support for mt8183 SCP.")
> > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> 
> Friendly ping for an important fix... :)
>

This seems to have slipped through the cracks...  I will take a look later
today.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> > ---
> >   drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > index 5b4404b8be4c..d1213c33da20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/mtk_rpmsg.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,9 @@ static void mtk_register_device_work_function(struct work_struct *register_work)
> >   		if (info->registered)
> >   			continue;
> > +		mutex_unlock(&subdev->channels_lock);
> >   		ret = mtk_rpmsg_register_device(subdev, &info->info);
> > +		mutex_lock(&subdev->channels_lock);
> >   		if (ret) {
> >   			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't create rpmsg_device\n");
> >   			continue;
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-17 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14 14:47 [PATCH] rpmsg: mtk_rpmsg: Fix circular locking dependency AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-14 14:47 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-01-14 14:47 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-16 16:06 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-16 16:06   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-16 16:06   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-17 16:08   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-02-17 16:08     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-17 16:08     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-17 19:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-17 19:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-17 19:03   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-18  9:16   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-18  9:16     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-18  9:16     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-02-18 18:01     ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-18 18:01       ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-02-18 18:01       ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-03-29 10:55       ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-03-29 10:55         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-03-29 10:55         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-03-29 15:08         ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-03-29 15:08           ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-03-29 15:08           ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-04-28 17:31 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-04-28 17:31   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-04-28 17:31   ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-04-29 13:37   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-29 13:37     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-29 13:37     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220217160851.GA474184@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pihsun@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.