Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] pci: use helper for safer setting of driver_override

[Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>]

In subject, to match drivers/pci/ convention, do something like:

  PCI: Use driver_set_override() instead of open-coding

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:13:04PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Use a helper for seting driver_override to reduce amount of duplicated
> code.

s/seting/setting/

> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 24 ++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index 602f0fb0b007..16a163d4623e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -567,31 +567,15 @@ static ssize_t driver_override_store(struct device *dev,
>  				     const char *buf, size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -	char *driver_override, *old, *cp;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* We need to keep extra room for a newline */
>  	if (count >= (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
>  		return -EINVAL;

This check makes no sense in the new function.  Michael alluded to
this as well.

> -	driver_override = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!driver_override)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	cp = strchr(driver_override, '\n');
> -	if (cp)
> -		*cp = '\0';
> -
> -	device_lock(dev);
> -	old = pdev->driver_override;
> -	if (strlen(driver_override)) {
> -		pdev->driver_override = driver_override;
> -	} else {
> -		kfree(driver_override);
> -		pdev->driver_override = NULL;
> -	}
> -	device_unlock(dev);
> -
> -	kfree(old);
> +	ret = driver_set_override(dev, &pdev->driver_override, buf);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	return count;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel