From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca748512-12bb-7d75-13f1-8d5ec9703e26@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en 0000:31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes), total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure" but haven't actually looked at the code yet.
That looks like the swiotlb buffer did not get initialized at all, but I
can't really explain why.
Can you stick in a printk and see if xen_swiotlb_init_early gets called
at all?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 17:28:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca748512-12bb-7d75-13f1-8d5ec9703e26@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en 0000:31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes), total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure" but haven't actually looked at the code yet.
That looks like the swiotlb buffer did not get initialized at all, but I
can't really explain why.
Can you stick in a printk and see if xen_swiotlb_init_early gets called
at all?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca748512-12bb-7d75-13f1-8d5ec9703e26@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en 0000:31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes), total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure" but haven't actually looked at the code yet.
That looks like the swiotlb buffer did not get initialized at all, but I
can't really explain why.
Can you stick in a printk and see if xen_swiotlb_init_early gets called
at all?
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca748512-12bb-7d75-13f1-8d5ec9703e26@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en 0000:31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes), total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure" but haven't actually looked at the code yet.
That looks like the swiotlb buffer did not get initialized at all, but I
can't really explain why.
Can you stick in a printk and see if xen_swiotlb_init_early gets called
at all?
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca748512-12bb-7d75-13f1-8d5ec9703e26@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en 0000:31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes), total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure" but haven't actually looked at the code yet.
That looks like the swiotlb buffer did not get initialized at all, but I
can't really explain why.
Can you stick in a printk and see if xen_swiotlb_init_early gets called
at all?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 18:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca748512-12bb-7d75-13f1-8d5ec9703e26@oracle.com>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en 0000:31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes), total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure" but haven't actually looked at the code yet.
That looks like the swiotlb buffer did not get initialized at all, but I
can't really explain why.
Can you stick in a printk and see if xen_swiotlb_init_early gets called
at all?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 228+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-01 10:52 cleanup swiotlb initialization v4 Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 01/12] dma-direct: use is_swiotlb_active in dma_direct_map_page Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 02/12] swiotlb: make swiotlb_exit a no-op if SWIOTLB_FORCE is set Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 03/12] swiotlb: simplify swiotlb_max_segment Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 04/12] swiotlb: rename swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] swiotlb: pass a gfp_mask argument to swiotlb_init_late Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 06/12] MIPS/octeon: use swiotlb_init instead of open coding it Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 16:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-03 16:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-03 16:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-03 16:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-03 16:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-03 16:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86: remove the IOMMU table infrastructure Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: centralize setting SWIOTLB_FORCE when guest memory encryption is enabled Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 11:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-01 11:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-01 11:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-01 11:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-01 11:39 ` Andrew Cooper via iommu
2022-03-01 11:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-01 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 09/12] swiotlb: make the swiotlb_init interface more useful Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 10/12] swiotlb: add a SWIOTLB_ANY flag to lift the low memory restriction Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 18:12 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-04 18:12 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-04 18:12 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-04 18:12 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-04 18:12 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX) via iommu
2022-03-04 18:12 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-04 18:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-03-04 18:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-03-04 18:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-03-04 18:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-03-04 18:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-03-04 18:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2022-03-06 17:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-06 17:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-06 17:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-06 17:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-06 17:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX) via iommu
2022-03-06 17:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 11/12] swiotlb: merge swiotlb-xen initialization into swiotlb Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-02 2:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 2:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 2:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 2:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 2:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 2:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-02 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-02 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-02 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-02 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-02 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 1:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 22:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 22:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 22:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 22:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 22:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-03 22:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-04 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 23:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-04 23:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-04 23:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-04 23:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-04 23:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-04 23:22 ` Stefano Stabellini
2022-03-02 13:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-02 13:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-03 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-03 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-03 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-03 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-03 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-03 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-03 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-03-04 17:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:36 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 17:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 20:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-04 21:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-08 21:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-08 21:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-08 21:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-08 21:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-08 21:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-08 21:38 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-09 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-09 15:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-09 15:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-09 15:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-09 15:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-09 15:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-09 15:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2022-03-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86: remove cruft from <asm/dma-mapping.h> Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-01 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220304172859.GA12860@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.