From: Jason Gunthorpe via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/11] iommu: Make IOPF handling framework generic
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:15:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220322121520.GB11336@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64fa931b-ea2d-f425-5baa-654216bac779@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 01:03:14PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2022/3/21 20:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:42:16AM +0000, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >
> > > I tend to disagree with that last part. The fault is caused by a specific
> > > device accessing shared page tables. We should keep that device
> > > information throughout the fault handling, so that we can report it to the
> > > driver when things go wrong.
> > SVA faults should never be reported to drivers??
> >
>
> When things go wrong, the corresponding response code will be responded
> to the device through iommu_page_response(). The hardware should then
> report the failure to the device driver and the device driver will
> handle it in the device-specific way. There's no need to propagate the
> I/O page faults to the device driver in any case. Do I understand it
> right?
Something like that, I would expect fault failure to be similar to
accessing somethiing that is not in the iommu map. An Error TLP like
thing toward the device and whatever normal device-specific error
propagation happens.
SVA shouldn't require any special support in the using driver beyond
turing on PRI/ATS
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/11] iommu: Make IOPF handling framework generic
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:15:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220322121520.GB11336@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64fa931b-ea2d-f425-5baa-654216bac779@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 01:03:14PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2022/3/21 20:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:42:16AM +0000, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >
> > > I tend to disagree with that last part. The fault is caused by a specific
> > > device accessing shared page tables. We should keep that device
> > > information throughout the fault handling, so that we can report it to the
> > > driver when things go wrong.
> > SVA faults should never be reported to drivers??
> >
>
> When things go wrong, the corresponding response code will be responded
> to the device through iommu_page_response(). The hardware should then
> report the failure to the device driver and the device driver will
> handle it in the device-specific way. There's no need to propagate the
> I/O page faults to the device driver in any case. Do I understand it
> right?
Something like that, I would expect fault failure to be similar to
accessing somethiing that is not in the iommu map. An Error TLP like
thing toward the device and whatever normal device-specific error
propagation happens.
SVA shouldn't require any special support in the using driver beyond
turing on PRI/ATS
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-20 6:40 [PATCH RFC 00/11] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] iommu: Add pasid_bits field in struct dev_iommu Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 7:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:22 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 10:22 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 0:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 0:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 0:48 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 0:48 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:22 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:22 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 0:45 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 0:45 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] iommu: Add iommu_domain type for SVA Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 7:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:23 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 10:23 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 11:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 0:54 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 0:54 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 7:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:27 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 10:27 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 7:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:37 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 10:37 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 4:25 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 4:25 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] arm-smmu-v3/sva: " Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 11:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] iommu/sva: Use attach/detach_pasid_dev in SVA interfaces Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 8:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 8:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 11:01 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:01 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 12:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-21 11:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 4:29 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 4:29 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 4:31 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 4:31 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] iommu: Remove SVA related callbacks from iommu ops Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] iommu: Handle IO page faults directly Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 0:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 0:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 4:50 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 4:50 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] iommu: Make IOPF handling framework generic Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 8:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 8:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 11:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 5:03 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 5:03 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 10:02 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 10:02 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 12:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu [this message]
2022-03-22 12:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 1:00 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 1:00 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 10:06 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 10:06 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 10:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 10:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 10:50 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 10:50 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:39 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:39 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 5:28 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 5:28 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-03-21 12:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 5:48 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 5:48 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h} Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220322121520.GB11336@nvidia.com \
--to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.