From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com
Cc: maz@kernel.org, bgardon@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
axelrasmussen@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add userfaultfd tests into page_fault_test
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:54:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220323225405.267155-9-ricarkol@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220323225405.267155-1-ricarkol@google.com>
Add some userfaultfd tests into page_fault_test. Punch holes into the
data and/or page-table memslots, perform some accesses, and check that
the faults are taken (or not taken) when expected.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c | 232 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 229 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
index 00477a4f10cb..99449eaddb2b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ uint64_t pte_gpa;
enum { PT, TEST, NR_MEMSLOTS};
struct memslot_desc {
+ size_t paging_size;
+ char *data_copy;
void *hva;
uint64_t gpa;
uint64_t size;
@@ -78,6 +80,9 @@ struct memslot_desc {
static struct event_cnt {
int aborts;
int fail_vcpu_runs;
+ int uffd_faults;
+ /* uffd_faults is incremented from multiple threads. */
+ pthread_mutex_t uffd_faults_mutex;
} events;
struct test_desc {
@@ -87,6 +92,8 @@ struct test_desc {
bool (*guest_prepare[PREPARE_FN_NR])(void);
void (*guest_test)(void);
void (*guest_test_check[CHECK_FN_NR])(void);
+ int (*uffd_pt_handler)(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg);
+ int (*uffd_test_handler)(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg);
void (*dabt_handler)(struct ex_regs *regs);
void (*iabt_handler)(struct ex_regs *regs);
uint32_t pt_memslot_flags;
@@ -305,6 +312,56 @@ static void no_iabt_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
GUEST_ASSERT_1(false, regs->pc);
}
+static int uffd_generic_handler(int uffd_mode, int uffd,
+ struct uffd_msg *msg, struct memslot_desc *memslot,
+ bool expect_write)
+{
+ uint64_t addr = msg->arg.pagefault.address;
+ uint64_t flags = msg->arg.pagefault.flags;
+ struct uffdio_copy copy;
+ int ret;
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(uffd_mode == UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING,
+ "The only expected UFFD mode is MISSING");
+ ASSERT_EQ(!!(flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE), expect_write);
+ ASSERT_EQ(addr, (uint64_t)memslot->hva);
+
+ pr_debug("uffd fault: addr=%p write=%d\n",
+ (void *)addr, !!(flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE));
+
+ copy.src = (uint64_t)memslot->data_copy;
+ copy.dst = addr;
+ copy.len = memslot->paging_size;
+ copy.mode = 0;
+
+ ret = ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_COPY, ©);
+ if (ret == -1) {
+ pr_info("Failed UFFDIO_COPY in 0x%lx with errno: %d\n",
+ addr, errno);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&events.uffd_faults_mutex);
+ events.uffd_faults += 1;
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&events.uffd_faults_mutex);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int uffd_pt_write_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
+{
+ return uffd_generic_handler(mode, uffd, msg, &memslot[PT], true);
+}
+
+static int uffd_test_write_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
+{
+ return uffd_generic_handler(mode, uffd, msg, &memslot[TEST], true);
+}
+
+static int uffd_test_read_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
+{
+ return uffd_generic_handler(mode, uffd, msg, &memslot[TEST], false);
+}
+
static void punch_hole_in_memslot(struct kvm_vm *vm,
struct memslot_desc *memslot)
{
@@ -314,11 +371,11 @@ static void punch_hole_in_memslot(struct kvm_vm *vm,
fd = vm_mem_region_get_src_fd(vm, memslot->idx);
if (fd != -1) {
ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE,
- 0, memslot->size);
+ 0, memslot->paging_size);
TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "fallocate failed, errno: %d\n", errno);
} else {
hva = addr_gpa2hva(vm, memslot->gpa);
- ret = madvise(hva, memslot->size, MADV_DONTNEED);
+ ret = madvise(hva, memslot->paging_size, MADV_DONTNEED);
TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "madvise failed, errno: %d\n", errno);
}
}
@@ -457,9 +514,60 @@ static void setup_memslots(struct kvm_vm *vm, enum vm_guest_mode mode,
virt_pg_map(vm, pte_gva, pte_gpa);
}
+static void setup_uffd(enum vm_guest_mode mode, struct test_params *p,
+ struct uffd_desc **uffd)
+{
+ struct test_desc *test = p->test_desc;
+ uint64_t large_page_size = get_backing_src_pagesz(p->src_type);
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * When creating the map, we might not only have created a pte page,
+ * but also an intermediate level (pte_gpa != gpa[PT]). So, we
+ * might need to demand page both.
+ */
+ memslot[PT].paging_size = align_up(pte_gpa - memslot[PT].gpa,
+ large_page_size) + large_page_size;
+ memslot[TEST].paging_size = large_page_size;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_MEMSLOTS; i++) {
+ memslot[i].data_copy = malloc(memslot[i].paging_size);
+ TEST_ASSERT(memslot[i].data_copy, "Failed malloc.");
+ memcpy(memslot[i].data_copy, memslot[i].hva,
+ memslot[i].paging_size);
+ }
+
+ uffd[PT] = NULL;
+ if (test->uffd_pt_handler)
+ uffd[PT] = uffd_setup_demand_paging(
+ UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING, 0,
+ memslot[PT].hva, memslot[PT].paging_size,
+ test->uffd_pt_handler);
+
+ uffd[TEST] = NULL;
+ if (test->uffd_test_handler)
+ uffd[TEST] = uffd_setup_demand_paging(
+ UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING, 0,
+ memslot[TEST].hva, memslot[TEST].paging_size,
+ test->uffd_test_handler);
+}
+
static void check_event_counts(struct test_desc *test)
{
ASSERT_EQ(test->expected_events.aborts, events.aborts);
+ ASSERT_EQ(test->expected_events.uffd_faults, events.uffd_faults);
+}
+
+static void free_uffd(struct test_desc *test, struct uffd_desc **uffd)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (test->uffd_pt_handler)
+ uffd_stop_demand_paging(uffd[PT]);
+ if (test->uffd_test_handler)
+ uffd_stop_demand_paging(uffd[TEST]);
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_MEMSLOTS; i++)
+ free(memslot[i].data_copy);
}
static void print_test_banner(enum vm_guest_mode mode, struct test_params *p)
@@ -517,6 +625,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
struct test_params *p = (struct test_params *)arg;
struct test_desc *test = p->test_desc;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct uffd_desc *uffd[NR_MEMSLOTS];
bool skip_test = false;
print_test_banner(mode, p);
@@ -528,7 +637,14 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
reset_event_counts();
setup_memslots(vm, mode, p);
+ /*
+ * Set some code at memslot[TEST].hva for the guest to execute (only
+ * applicable to the EXEC tests). This has to be done before
+ * setup_uffd() as that function copies the memslot data for the uffd
+ * handler.
+ */
load_exec_code_for_test();
+ setup_uffd(mode, p, uffd);
setup_abort_handlers(vm, test);
setup_guest_args(vm, test);
@@ -542,7 +658,12 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
sync_stats_from_guest(vm);
ucall_uninit(vm);
kvm_vm_free(vm);
+ free_uffd(test, uffd);
+ /*
+ * Make sure this is called after the uffd threads have exited (and
+ * updated their respective event counters).
+ */
if (!skip_test)
check_event_counts(test);
}
@@ -625,6 +746,43 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
__VA_ARGS__ \
}
+#define TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __uffd_handler, ...) \
+{ \
+ .name = SNAME(ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD ## _ ## __a), \
+ .guest_test = __a, \
+ .mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_TEST, \
+ .uffd_test_handler = __uffd_handler, \
+ .expected_events = { .uffd_faults = 1, }, \
+ __VA_ARGS__ \
+}
+
+#define TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __uffd_handler, ...) \
+{ \
+ .name = SNAME(S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD ## _ ## __a), \
+ .guest_test = __a, \
+ .mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_PT, \
+ .uffd_pt_handler = __uffd_handler, \
+ .expected_events = { .uffd_faults = 1, }, \
+ __VA_ARGS__ \
+}
+
+#define TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(__a, __uffd_handler) \
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __uffd_handler, __AF_TEST_ARGS)
+
+#define TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __th, __ph, ...) \
+{ \
+ .name = SNAME(ACCESS_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD ## _ ## __a), \
+ .guest_test = __a, \
+ .mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_PT | CMD_HOLE_TEST, \
+ .uffd_pt_handler = __ph, \
+ .uffd_test_handler = __th, \
+ .expected_events = { .uffd_faults = 2, }, \
+ __VA_ARGS__ \
+}
+
+#define TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(__a, __th, __ph) \
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __th, __ph, __AF_TEST_ARGS)
+
static struct test_desc tests[] = {
/* Check that HW is setting the AF (sanity checks). */
TEST_HW_ACCESS_FLAG(guest_test_read64),
@@ -640,10 +798,78 @@ static struct test_desc tests[] = {
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_cas, __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_ld_preidx),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_write64),
- TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_at),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_dc_zva),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_st_preidx),
+ /* UFFD basic (sanity checks) */
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_read64, uffd_test_read_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas, uffd_test_read_handler,
+ __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_ld_preidx, uffd_test_read_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_write64, uffd_test_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_st_preidx, uffd_test_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_dc_zva, uffd_test_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_exec, uffd_test_read_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD fault due to S1PTW. Note how they are all write faults. */
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_read64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_at, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_ld_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_write64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_dc_zva, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_st_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_exec, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD fault due to S1PTW with AF. Note how they all write faults. */
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_read64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __AF_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ /*
+ * Can't test the AF case for address translation insts (D5.4.11) as
+ * it's IMPDEF whether that marks the AF.
+ */
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_ld_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_write64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_st_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_dc_zva, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_exec, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD faults due to an access and its S1PTW. */
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_read64,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_ld_preidx,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_write64,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_dc_zva,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_st_preidx,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_exec,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD faults due to an access and its S1PTW with AF. */
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_read64,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __AF_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_ld_preidx,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_write64,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_dc_zva,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_st_preidx,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_exec,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
{ 0 },
};
--
2.35.1.894.gb6a874cedc-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, oupton@google.com, reijiw@google.com,
rananta@google.com, bgardon@google.com, axelrasmussen@google.com,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add userfaultfd tests into page_fault_test
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:54:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220323225405.267155-9-ricarkol@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220323225405.267155-1-ricarkol@google.com>
Add some userfaultfd tests into page_fault_test. Punch holes into the
data and/or page-table memslots, perform some accesses, and check that
the faults are taken (or not taken) when expected.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c | 232 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 229 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
index 00477a4f10cb..99449eaddb2b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/page_fault_test.c
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ uint64_t pte_gpa;
enum { PT, TEST, NR_MEMSLOTS};
struct memslot_desc {
+ size_t paging_size;
+ char *data_copy;
void *hva;
uint64_t gpa;
uint64_t size;
@@ -78,6 +80,9 @@ struct memslot_desc {
static struct event_cnt {
int aborts;
int fail_vcpu_runs;
+ int uffd_faults;
+ /* uffd_faults is incremented from multiple threads. */
+ pthread_mutex_t uffd_faults_mutex;
} events;
struct test_desc {
@@ -87,6 +92,8 @@ struct test_desc {
bool (*guest_prepare[PREPARE_FN_NR])(void);
void (*guest_test)(void);
void (*guest_test_check[CHECK_FN_NR])(void);
+ int (*uffd_pt_handler)(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg);
+ int (*uffd_test_handler)(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg);
void (*dabt_handler)(struct ex_regs *regs);
void (*iabt_handler)(struct ex_regs *regs);
uint32_t pt_memslot_flags;
@@ -305,6 +312,56 @@ static void no_iabt_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
GUEST_ASSERT_1(false, regs->pc);
}
+static int uffd_generic_handler(int uffd_mode, int uffd,
+ struct uffd_msg *msg, struct memslot_desc *memslot,
+ bool expect_write)
+{
+ uint64_t addr = msg->arg.pagefault.address;
+ uint64_t flags = msg->arg.pagefault.flags;
+ struct uffdio_copy copy;
+ int ret;
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(uffd_mode == UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING,
+ "The only expected UFFD mode is MISSING");
+ ASSERT_EQ(!!(flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE), expect_write);
+ ASSERT_EQ(addr, (uint64_t)memslot->hva);
+
+ pr_debug("uffd fault: addr=%p write=%d\n",
+ (void *)addr, !!(flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE));
+
+ copy.src = (uint64_t)memslot->data_copy;
+ copy.dst = addr;
+ copy.len = memslot->paging_size;
+ copy.mode = 0;
+
+ ret = ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_COPY, ©);
+ if (ret == -1) {
+ pr_info("Failed UFFDIO_COPY in 0x%lx with errno: %d\n",
+ addr, errno);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&events.uffd_faults_mutex);
+ events.uffd_faults += 1;
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&events.uffd_faults_mutex);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int uffd_pt_write_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
+{
+ return uffd_generic_handler(mode, uffd, msg, &memslot[PT], true);
+}
+
+static int uffd_test_write_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
+{
+ return uffd_generic_handler(mode, uffd, msg, &memslot[TEST], true);
+}
+
+static int uffd_test_read_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
+{
+ return uffd_generic_handler(mode, uffd, msg, &memslot[TEST], false);
+}
+
static void punch_hole_in_memslot(struct kvm_vm *vm,
struct memslot_desc *memslot)
{
@@ -314,11 +371,11 @@ static void punch_hole_in_memslot(struct kvm_vm *vm,
fd = vm_mem_region_get_src_fd(vm, memslot->idx);
if (fd != -1) {
ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE,
- 0, memslot->size);
+ 0, memslot->paging_size);
TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "fallocate failed, errno: %d\n", errno);
} else {
hva = addr_gpa2hva(vm, memslot->gpa);
- ret = madvise(hva, memslot->size, MADV_DONTNEED);
+ ret = madvise(hva, memslot->paging_size, MADV_DONTNEED);
TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "madvise failed, errno: %d\n", errno);
}
}
@@ -457,9 +514,60 @@ static void setup_memslots(struct kvm_vm *vm, enum vm_guest_mode mode,
virt_pg_map(vm, pte_gva, pte_gpa);
}
+static void setup_uffd(enum vm_guest_mode mode, struct test_params *p,
+ struct uffd_desc **uffd)
+{
+ struct test_desc *test = p->test_desc;
+ uint64_t large_page_size = get_backing_src_pagesz(p->src_type);
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * When creating the map, we might not only have created a pte page,
+ * but also an intermediate level (pte_gpa != gpa[PT]). So, we
+ * might need to demand page both.
+ */
+ memslot[PT].paging_size = align_up(pte_gpa - memslot[PT].gpa,
+ large_page_size) + large_page_size;
+ memslot[TEST].paging_size = large_page_size;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_MEMSLOTS; i++) {
+ memslot[i].data_copy = malloc(memslot[i].paging_size);
+ TEST_ASSERT(memslot[i].data_copy, "Failed malloc.");
+ memcpy(memslot[i].data_copy, memslot[i].hva,
+ memslot[i].paging_size);
+ }
+
+ uffd[PT] = NULL;
+ if (test->uffd_pt_handler)
+ uffd[PT] = uffd_setup_demand_paging(
+ UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING, 0,
+ memslot[PT].hva, memslot[PT].paging_size,
+ test->uffd_pt_handler);
+
+ uffd[TEST] = NULL;
+ if (test->uffd_test_handler)
+ uffd[TEST] = uffd_setup_demand_paging(
+ UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING, 0,
+ memslot[TEST].hva, memslot[TEST].paging_size,
+ test->uffd_test_handler);
+}
+
static void check_event_counts(struct test_desc *test)
{
ASSERT_EQ(test->expected_events.aborts, events.aborts);
+ ASSERT_EQ(test->expected_events.uffd_faults, events.uffd_faults);
+}
+
+static void free_uffd(struct test_desc *test, struct uffd_desc **uffd)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (test->uffd_pt_handler)
+ uffd_stop_demand_paging(uffd[PT]);
+ if (test->uffd_test_handler)
+ uffd_stop_demand_paging(uffd[TEST]);
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_MEMSLOTS; i++)
+ free(memslot[i].data_copy);
}
static void print_test_banner(enum vm_guest_mode mode, struct test_params *p)
@@ -517,6 +625,7 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
struct test_params *p = (struct test_params *)arg;
struct test_desc *test = p->test_desc;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct uffd_desc *uffd[NR_MEMSLOTS];
bool skip_test = false;
print_test_banner(mode, p);
@@ -528,7 +637,14 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
reset_event_counts();
setup_memslots(vm, mode, p);
+ /*
+ * Set some code at memslot[TEST].hva for the guest to execute (only
+ * applicable to the EXEC tests). This has to be done before
+ * setup_uffd() as that function copies the memslot data for the uffd
+ * handler.
+ */
load_exec_code_for_test();
+ setup_uffd(mode, p, uffd);
setup_abort_handlers(vm, test);
setup_guest_args(vm, test);
@@ -542,7 +658,12 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
sync_stats_from_guest(vm);
ucall_uninit(vm);
kvm_vm_free(vm);
+ free_uffd(test, uffd);
+ /*
+ * Make sure this is called after the uffd threads have exited (and
+ * updated their respective event counters).
+ */
if (!skip_test)
check_event_counts(test);
}
@@ -625,6 +746,43 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
__VA_ARGS__ \
}
+#define TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __uffd_handler, ...) \
+{ \
+ .name = SNAME(ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD ## _ ## __a), \
+ .guest_test = __a, \
+ .mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_TEST, \
+ .uffd_test_handler = __uffd_handler, \
+ .expected_events = { .uffd_faults = 1, }, \
+ __VA_ARGS__ \
+}
+
+#define TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __uffd_handler, ...) \
+{ \
+ .name = SNAME(S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD ## _ ## __a), \
+ .guest_test = __a, \
+ .mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_PT, \
+ .uffd_pt_handler = __uffd_handler, \
+ .expected_events = { .uffd_faults = 1, }, \
+ __VA_ARGS__ \
+}
+
+#define TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(__a, __uffd_handler) \
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __uffd_handler, __AF_TEST_ARGS)
+
+#define TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __th, __ph, ...) \
+{ \
+ .name = SNAME(ACCESS_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD ## _ ## __a), \
+ .guest_test = __a, \
+ .mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_PT | CMD_HOLE_TEST, \
+ .uffd_pt_handler = __ph, \
+ .uffd_test_handler = __th, \
+ .expected_events = { .uffd_faults = 2, }, \
+ __VA_ARGS__ \
+}
+
+#define TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(__a, __th, __ph) \
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(__a, __th, __ph, __AF_TEST_ARGS)
+
static struct test_desc tests[] = {
/* Check that HW is setting the AF (sanity checks). */
TEST_HW_ACCESS_FLAG(guest_test_read64),
@@ -640,10 +798,78 @@ static struct test_desc tests[] = {
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_cas, __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_ld_preidx),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_write64),
- TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_at),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_dc_zva),
TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_NO_FAULTS(guest_test_st_preidx),
+ /* UFFD basic (sanity checks) */
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_read64, uffd_test_read_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas, uffd_test_read_handler,
+ __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_ld_preidx, uffd_test_read_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_write64, uffd_test_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_st_preidx, uffd_test_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_dc_zva, uffd_test_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_exec, uffd_test_read_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD fault due to S1PTW. Note how they are all write faults. */
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_read64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_at, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_ld_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_write64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_dc_zva, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_st_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_exec, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD fault due to S1PTW with AF. Note how they all write faults. */
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_read64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __AF_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ /*
+ * Can't test the AF case for address translation insts (D5.4.11) as
+ * it's IMPDEF whether that marks the AF.
+ */
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_ld_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_write64, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_st_preidx, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_dc_zva, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_exec, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD faults due to an access and its S1PTW. */
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_read64,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __PREPARE_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_ld_preidx,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_write64,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_dc_zva,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_st_preidx,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_exec,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
+ /* UFFD faults due to an access and its S1PTW with AF. */
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_read64,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD(guest_test_cas,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler,
+ __AF_LSE_TEST_ARGS),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_ld_preidx,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_write64,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_dc_zva,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_st_preidx,
+ uffd_test_write_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+ TEST_ACCESS_AND_S1PTW_ON_HOLE_UFFD_AF(guest_test_exec,
+ uffd_test_read_handler, uffd_pt_write_handler),
+
{ 0 },
};
--
2.35.1.894.gb6a874cedc-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-23 22:53 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: selftests: Add aarch64/page_fault_test Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: selftests: Add a userfaultfd library Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-24 17:01 ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-24 17:01 ` Ben Gardon
2022-05-19 3:19 ` Oliver Upton
2022-05-19 3:19 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-23 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add vm_get_pte_gpa library function Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: selftests: Add vm_alloc_page_table_in_memslot " Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Export _virt_pg_map with a pt_memslot arg Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: selftests: Add missing close and munmap in __vm_mem_region_delete Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-24 17:04 ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-24 17:04 ` Ben Gardon
2022-03-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: selftests: Add vm_mem_region_get_src_fd library function Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add aarch64/page_fault_test Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-25 21:39 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-25 21:39 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2022-03-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add userfaultfd tests into page_fault_test Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add dirty logging " Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add readonly memslot " Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add mix of " Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220323225405.267155-9-ricarkol@google.com \
--to=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.