From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Link spt to sp during allocation
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:55:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401175554.1931568-9-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401175554.1931568-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Link the shadow page table to the sp (via set_page_private()) during
allocation rather than initialization. This is a more logical place to
do it because allocation time is also where we do the reverse link
(setting sp->spt).
This creates one extra call to set_page_private(), but having multiple
calls to set_page_private() is unavoidable anyway. We either do
set_page_private() during allocation, which requires 1 per allocation
function, or we do it during initialization, which requires 1 per
initialization function.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index b3b6426725d4..17354e55735f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
+ set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
return sp;
}
@@ -281,8 +282,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void tdp_mmu_init_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
gfn_t gfn, union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
{
- set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
-
sp->role = role;
sp->gfn = gfn;
sp->ptep = sptep;
@@ -1435,6 +1434,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
return NULL;
}
+ set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
+
return sp;
}
--
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS \(KVM/mips\)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS \(KVM/mips\)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>, David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V \(KVM/riscv\)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 \(KVM/arm64\)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Link spt to sp during allocation
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:55:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401175554.1931568-9-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401175554.1931568-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Link the shadow page table to the sp (via set_page_private()) during
allocation rather than initialization. This is a more logical place to
do it because allocation time is also where we do the reverse link
(setting sp->spt).
This creates one extra call to set_page_private(), but having multiple
calls to set_page_private() is unavoidable anyway. We either do
set_page_private() during allocation, which requires 1 per allocation
function, or we do it during initialization, which requires 1 per
initialization function.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index b3b6426725d4..17354e55735f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
+ set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
return sp;
}
@@ -281,8 +282,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void tdp_mmu_init_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
gfn_t gfn, union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
{
- set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
-
sp->role = role;
sp->gfn = gfn;
sp->ptep = sptep;
@@ -1435,6 +1434,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
return NULL;
}
+ set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
+
return sp;
}
--
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Link spt to sp during allocation
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:55:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401175554.1931568-9-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401175554.1931568-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Link the shadow page table to the sp (via set_page_private()) during
allocation rather than initialization. This is a more logical place to
do it because allocation time is also where we do the reverse link
(setting sp->spt).
This creates one extra call to set_page_private(), but having multiple
calls to set_page_private() is unavoidable anyway. We either do
set_page_private() during allocation, which requires 1 per allocation
function, or we do it during initialization, which requires 1 per
initialization function.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index b3b6426725d4..17354e55735f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
sp = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
+ set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
return sp;
}
@@ -281,8 +282,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_alloc_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void tdp_mmu_init_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, tdp_ptep_t sptep,
gfn_t gfn, union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
{
- set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
-
sp->role = role;
sp->gfn = gfn;
sp->ptep = sptep;
@@ -1435,6 +1434,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__tdp_mmu_alloc_sp_for_split(gfp_t gfp)
return NULL;
}
+ set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
+
return sp;
}
--
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 17:55 [PATCH v3 00/23] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-08 22:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-08 22:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-08 22:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memslot to kvm_mmu_new_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Separate shadow MMU sp allocation from initialization David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Link spt to sp during allocation David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Move huge page split sp allocation code to mmu.c David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to free kvm_mmu_page structs David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to allocate shadow pages from vCPU caches David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to init_shadow_page() and descendants David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-02 6:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02 6:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02 6:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02 7:01 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02 7:01 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02 7:01 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-09 0:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09 0:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09 0:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-14 16:47 ` David Matlack
2022-04-14 16:47 ` David Matlack
2022-04-14 16:47 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in " David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-20 10:55 ` Anup Patel
2022-04-20 10:55 ` Anup Patel
2022-04-20 10:55 ` Anup Patel
2022-04-21 16:19 ` Ben Gardon
2022-04-21 16:19 ` Ben Gardon
2022-04-21 16:19 ` Ben Gardon
2022-04-21 16:33 ` David Matlack
2022-04-21 16:33 ` David Matlack
2022-04-21 16:33 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] KVM: Allow GFP flags to be passed when topping up MMU caches David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Support Eager Page Splitting in the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-09 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-09 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-14 16:50 ` David Matlack
2022-04-14 16:50 ` David Matlack
2022-04-14 16:50 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] KVM: selftests: Map x86_64 guest virtual memory with huge pages David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 17:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 17:54 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 17:54 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 17:54 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 23:41 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 23:41 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 23:41 ` David Matlack
2022-04-12 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 16:49 ` David Matlack
2022-04-12 16:49 ` David Matlack
2022-04-12 16:49 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 1:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 1:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 1:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 17:57 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 17:57 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 17:57 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 18:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 18:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 18:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 21:22 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 21:22 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 21:22 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401175554.1931568-9-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.