From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 02:02:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204190104.VspbI376-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-14-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-selinux/next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.18-rc3 next-20220414]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-audit/next jmorris-security/next-testing]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220419-000109
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git next
config: i386-tinyconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220419/202204190104.VspbI376-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-19) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/2fa01492487f9135e9ea9e59924289cc23a66576
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220419-000109
git checkout 2fa01492487f9135e9ea9e59924289cc23a66576
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/sched/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:61,
from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:88,
from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1,
from kernel/sched/core.c:13:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/sched/core.c: At top level:
kernel/sched/core.c:5235:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'task_sched_runtime' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
5235 | unsigned long long task_sched_runtime(struct task_struct *p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/core.c:9420:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_init_smp' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
9420 | void __init sched_init_smp(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/core.c:9448:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
9448 | void __init sched_init(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:61,
from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:88,
from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1,
from kernel/sched/sched.h:60,
from kernel/sched/fair.c:53:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/sched/fair.c: At top level:
kernel/sched/fair.c:5530:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'init_cfs_bandwidth' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
5530 | void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11757:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11757 | void free_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11759:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'alloc_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11759 | int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11764:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'online_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11764 | void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11766:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'unregister_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11766 | void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:61,
from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:88,
from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1,
from kernel/sched/sched.h:60,
from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:33:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:43:
kernel/sched/rt.c: At top level:
kernel/sched/rt.c:259:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'unregister_rt_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
259 | void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/rt.c:261:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_rt_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
261 | void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/rt.c:263:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'alloc_rt_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
263 | int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/rt.c:666:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_rt_bandwidth_account' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
666 | bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:39:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +/secid +1147 include/linux/security.h
ee18d64c1f6320 David Howells 2009-09-02 1143
2fa01492487f91 Casey Schaufler 2022-04-18 1144 static inline void security_cred_getsecid(const struct cred *c,
2fa01492487f91 Casey Schaufler 2022-04-18 1145 struct lsmblob *blob)
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 1146 {
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 @1147 *secid = 0;
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 1148 }
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 1149
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 02:02:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204190104.VspbI376-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-14-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-selinux/next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.18-rc3 next-20220414]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-audit/next jmorris-security/next-testing]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220419-000109
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git next
config: i386-tinyconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220419/202204190104.VspbI376-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-19) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/2fa01492487f9135e9ea9e59924289cc23a66576
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/integrity-disassociate-ima_filter_rule-from-security_audit_rule/20220419-000109
git checkout 2fa01492487f9135e9ea9e59924289cc23a66576
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/sched/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:61,
from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:88,
from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1,
from kernel/sched/core.c:13:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/sched/core.c: At top level:
kernel/sched/core.c:5235:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'task_sched_runtime' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
5235 | unsigned long long task_sched_runtime(struct task_struct *p)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/core.c:9420:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_init_smp' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
9420 | void __init sched_init_smp(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/core.c:9448:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
9448 | void __init sched_init(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:61,
from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:88,
from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1,
from kernel/sched/sched.h:60,
from kernel/sched/fair.c:53:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/sched/fair.c: At top level:
kernel/sched/fair.c:5530:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'init_cfs_bandwidth' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
5530 | void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) {}
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11757:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11757 | void free_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11759:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'alloc_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11759 | int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11764:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'online_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11764 | void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/fair.c:11766:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'unregister_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
11766 | void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:61,
from include/linux/trace_events.h:10,
from include/trace/syscall.h:7,
from include/linux/syscalls.h:88,
from include/linux/syscalls_api.h:1,
from kernel/sched/sched.h:60,
from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:33:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:43:
kernel/sched/rt.c: At top level:
kernel/sched/rt.c:259:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'unregister_rt_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
259 | void unregister_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/rt.c:261:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_rt_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
261 | void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/rt.c:263:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'alloc_rt_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
263 | int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/sched/rt.c:666:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_rt_bandwidth_account' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
666 | bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:39:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_cred_getsecid':
>> include/linux/security.h:1147:10: error: 'secid' undeclared (first use in this function)
1147 | *secid = 0;
| ^~~~~
include/linux/security.h:1147:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +/secid +1147 include/linux/security.h
ee18d64c1f6320 David Howells 2009-09-02 1143
2fa01492487f91 Casey Schaufler 2022-04-18 1144 static inline void security_cred_getsecid(const struct cred *c,
2fa01492487f91 Casey Schaufler 2022-04-18 1145 struct lsmblob *blob)
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 1146 {
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 @1147 *secid = 0;
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 1148 }
4d5b5539742d25 Todd Kjos 2021-10-12 1149
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-18 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220418145945.38797-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:51 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:51 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-26 23:15 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 23:15 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-19 16:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-20 19:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-20 21:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 3:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:49 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:49 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 0:38 ` John Johansen
2022-04-27 0:38 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 18:02 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-18 18:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 17:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 17:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:31 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:31 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:58 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:58 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:18 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:18 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 15:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 15:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 16:02 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 16:02 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 20:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 20:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:26 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:26 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-25 23:33 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:33 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:27 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:27 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 1:06 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 1:06 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:01 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:01 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:28 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:28 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 1:08 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 1:08 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:07 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:07 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:29 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:29 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 3:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 3:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:24 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:24 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 8:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-22 8:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202204190104.VspbI376-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.