All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch_topology: support for describing cache topology from DT
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:27:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204221720.cO70SkrD-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1650552960-60165-2-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>

Hi Qing,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on driver-core/driver-core-testing linus/master arm-perf/for-next/perf v5.18-rc3 next-20220421]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qing-Wang/Add-complex-scheduler-level-for-arm64/20220421-225748
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: riscv-randconfig-c006-20220421 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220422/202204221720.cO70SkrD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5bd87350a5ae429baf8f373cb226a57b62f87280)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/854ee80a8c32ea98203c96ba25cae2e87eeb43b1
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Qing-Wang/Add-complex-scheduler-level-for-arm64/20220421-225748
        git checkout 854ee80a8c32ea98203c96ba25cae2e87eeb43b1
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash arch/riscv/ drivers/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/base/arch_topology.c:617:1: error: unknown type name 'staic'; did you mean 'static'?
   staic struct device_node *cache_topology[NR_CPUS][MAX_CACHE_LEVEL];
   ^~~~~
   static
   1 error generated.


vim +617 drivers/base/arch_topology.c

   612	
   613	/*
   614	 * cpu cache topology table
   615	 */
   616	#define MAX_CACHE_LEVEL 7
 > 617	staic struct device_node *cache_topology[NR_CPUS][MAX_CACHE_LEVEL];
   618	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch_topology: support for describing cache topology from DT
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:27:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204221720.cO70SkrD-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1650552960-60165-2-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>

Hi Qing,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on driver-core/driver-core-testing linus/master arm-perf/for-next/perf v5.18-rc3 next-20220421]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qing-Wang/Add-complex-scheduler-level-for-arm64/20220421-225748
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: riscv-randconfig-c006-20220421 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220422/202204221720.cO70SkrD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5bd87350a5ae429baf8f373cb226a57b62f87280)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/854ee80a8c32ea98203c96ba25cae2e87eeb43b1
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Qing-Wang/Add-complex-scheduler-level-for-arm64/20220421-225748
        git checkout 854ee80a8c32ea98203c96ba25cae2e87eeb43b1
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash arch/riscv/ drivers/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/base/arch_topology.c:617:1: error: unknown type name 'staic'; did you mean 'static'?
   staic struct device_node *cache_topology[NR_CPUS][MAX_CACHE_LEVEL];
   ^~~~~
   static
   1 error generated.


vim +617 drivers/base/arch_topology.c

   612	
   613	/*
   614	 * cpu cache topology table
   615	 */
   616	#define MAX_CACHE_LEVEL 7
 > 617	staic struct device_node *cache_topology[NR_CPUS][MAX_CACHE_LEVEL];
   618	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-21 14:55 [PATCH 0/2] Add complex scheduler level for arm64 Qing Wang
2022-04-21 14:55 ` Qing Wang
2022-04-21 14:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] arch_topology: support for describing cache topology from DT Qing Wang
2022-04-21 14:55   ` Qing Wang
2022-04-21 15:47   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-04-21 15:47     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-04-22  2:30   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-22  2:30     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-22  9:22   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-22  9:22     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-04-22  9:48     ` 王擎
2022-04-22  9:48       ` 王擎
2022-04-22  9:27   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-22  9:27     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-21 14:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Add complex scheduler level for arm64 Qing Wang
2022-04-21 14:55   ` Qing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202204221720.cO70SkrD-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.