From: David Vernet <void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
To: akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Cc: tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
roman.gushchin-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org,
void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] cgroup: Account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:56:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220423155619.3669555-4-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220423155619.3669555-1-void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
The test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() testcase in the cgroup memcg tests
validates that processes in a group that perform allocations exceeding
memory.oom.group are killed. It also validates that the
memory.events.oom_kill events are properly propagated in this case. Commit
06e11c907ea4 ("kselftests: memcg: update the oom group leaf events test")
fixed test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() to account for the fact that the
memory.events.oom_kill events in a child cgroup is propagated up to its
parent. This behavior can actually be configured by the memory_localevents
mount option, so this patch updates the testcase to properly account for
the possible presence of this mount option.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org>
---
.../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 21 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
index d37e8dfb1248..e899b3f28c22 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "../kselftest.h"
#include "cgroup_util.h"
+static bool has_localevents;
static bool has_recursiveprot;
/*
@@ -1091,6 +1092,7 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events(const char *root)
{
int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
char *parent, *child;
+ long parent_oom_events;
parent = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0");
child = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0/memcg_test_1");
@@ -1128,10 +1130,16 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events(const char *root)
if (cg_read_key_long(child, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
goto cleanup;
- if (cg_read_key_long(parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
- goto cleanup;
-
- ret = KSFT_PASS;
+ parent_oom_events = cg_read_key_long(
+ parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ");
+ /*
+ * If memory_localevents is not enabled (the default), the parent should
+ * count OOM events in its children groups. Otherwise, it should not
+ * have observed any events.
+ */
+ if ((has_localevents && parent_oom_events == 0) ||
+ parent_oom_events > 0)
+ ret = KSFT_PASS;
cleanup:
if (child)
@@ -1298,6 +1306,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
has_recursiveprot = proc_status;
+ proc_status = proc_mount_contains("memory_localevents");
+ if (proc_status < 0)
+ ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
+ has_localevents = proc_status;
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
switch (tests[i].fn(root)) {
case KSFT_PASS:
--
2.30.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
shakeelb@google.com, kernel-team@fb.com, void@manifault.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] cgroup: Account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 08:56:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220423155619.3669555-4-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220423155619.3669555-1-void@manifault.com>
The test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() testcase in the cgroup memcg tests
validates that processes in a group that perform allocations exceeding
memory.oom.group are killed. It also validates that the
memory.events.oom_kill events are properly propagated in this case. Commit
06e11c907ea4 ("kselftests: memcg: update the oom group leaf events test")
fixed test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() to account for the fact that the
memory.events.oom_kill events in a child cgroup is propagated up to its
parent. This behavior can actually be configured by the memory_localevents
mount option, so this patch updates the testcase to properly account for
the possible presence of this mount option.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 21 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
index d37e8dfb1248..e899b3f28c22 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "../kselftest.h"
#include "cgroup_util.h"
+static bool has_localevents;
static bool has_recursiveprot;
/*
@@ -1091,6 +1092,7 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events(const char *root)
{
int ret = KSFT_FAIL;
char *parent, *child;
+ long parent_oom_events;
parent = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0");
child = cg_name(root, "memcg_test_0/memcg_test_1");
@@ -1128,10 +1130,16 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events(const char *root)
if (cg_read_key_long(child, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
goto cleanup;
- if (cg_read_key_long(parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
- goto cleanup;
-
- ret = KSFT_PASS;
+ parent_oom_events = cg_read_key_long(
+ parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ");
+ /*
+ * If memory_localevents is not enabled (the default), the parent should
+ * count OOM events in its children groups. Otherwise, it should not
+ * have observed any events.
+ */
+ if ((has_localevents && parent_oom_events == 0) ||
+ parent_oom_events > 0)
+ ret = KSFT_PASS;
cleanup:
if (child)
@@ -1298,6 +1306,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
has_recursiveprot = proc_status;
+ proc_status = proc_mount_contains("memory_localevents");
+ if (proc_status < 0)
+ ksft_exit_skip("Failed to query cgroup mount option\n");
+ has_localevents = proc_status;
+
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
switch (tests[i].fn(root)) {
case KSFT_PASS:
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-23 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-23 15:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix bugs in memcontroller cgroup tests David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cgroups: Refactor children cgroups in memcg tests David Vernet
[not found] ` <20220423155619.3669555-2-void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
2022-04-26 1:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-26 1:56 ` Roman Gushchin
[not found] ` <20220423155619.3669555-1-void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
2022-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cgroup: Account for memory_recursiveprot in test_memcg_low() David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` David Vernet
[not found] ` <20220423155619.3669555-3-void-gq6j2QGBifHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>
2022-04-27 14:09 ` Michal Koutný
2022-04-27 14:09 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220427140928.GD9823-9OudH3eul5jcvrawFnH+a6VXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2022-04-29 1:03 ` David Vernet
2022-04-29 1:03 ` David Vernet
[not found] ` <20220429010333.5rt2jwpiumnbuapf-2sxDN0k4oOr/D8ZFBB3Vemm1Eemhq0z/AL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2022-04-29 9:26 ` Michal Koutný
2022-04-29 9:26 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220429092620.GA23621-9OudH3eul5jcvrawFnH+a6VXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-06 16:40 ` David Vernet
2022-05-06 16:40 ` David Vernet
[not found] ` <20220506164015.fsdsuv226nhllos5-2sxDN0k4oOr/D8ZFBB3Vemm1Eemhq0z/AL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-09 15:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-09 15:09 ` Johannes Weiner
[not found] ` <Ynkum8DeJIAtGi9y-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-10 0:44 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-10 0:44 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20220509174424.e43e695ffe0f7333c187fba8-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-10 17:43 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-10 17:43 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220510174341.GC24172-9OudH3eul5jcvrawFnH+a6VXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-11 17:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-11 17:53 ` Johannes Weiner
[not found] ` <Ynv4AdjeVjptnjrH-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-12 17:27 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-12 17:27 ` Michal Koutný
2022-04-23 15:56 ` David Vernet [this message]
2022-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cgroup: Account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events() David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cgroup: Removing racy check in test_memcg_sock() David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cgroup: Fix racy check in alloc_pagecache_max_30M() helper function David Vernet
2022-04-23 15:56 ` David Vernet
2022-05-12 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix bugs in memcontroller cgroup tests Michal Koutný
2022-05-12 17:04 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220512170410.GA16096-9OudH3eul5jcvrawFnH+a6VXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-12 17:30 ` David Vernet
2022-05-12 17:30 ` David Vernet
[not found] ` <20220512173018.3pqlfwfigbbkoh4u-2sxDN0k4oOr/D8ZFBB3Vemm1Eemhq0z/AL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-12 17:44 ` David Vernet
2022-05-12 17:44 ` David Vernet
[not found] ` <20220512174452.tr34tuh4k5jm6qjs-2sxDN0k4oOr/D8ZFBB3Vemm1Eemhq0z/AL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-13 17:18 ` [PATCH 0/4] memcontrol selftests fixups Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 17:18 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220513171811.730-1-mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-13 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests: memcg: Fix compilation Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 17:18 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220513171811.730-2-mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-13 17:40 ` David Vernet
2022-05-13 17:40 ` David Vernet
2022-05-13 18:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 18:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 19:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 19:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 17:18 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220513171811.730-3-mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-13 17:42 ` David Vernet
2022-05-13 17:42 ` David Vernet
2022-05-13 18:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-18 15:54 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-18 15:54 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 17:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests: memcg: Adjust expected reclaim values of protected cgroups Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 17:18 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220513171811.730-4-mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-13 18:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 18:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 17:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests: memcg: Remove protection from top level memcg Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 17:18 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220513171811.730-5-mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-13 18:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-13 18:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-18 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-18 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20220517172443.3e524a8319c693ab24c5f22e-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2022-05-18 0:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-18 0:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-18 15:44 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-18 15:44 ` Michal Koutný
2022-05-13 19:14 ` David Vernet
2022-05-13 19:14 ` David Vernet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220423155619.3669555-4-void@manifault.com \
--to=void-gq6j2qgbifhby3ivrkzq2a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin-fxUVXftIFDnyG1zEObXtfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.