* [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs @ 2022-05-01 18:47 Khem Raj 2022-05-03 13:06 ` Jon Mason 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2022-05-01 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: meta-arm; +Cc: Khem Raj The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> --- meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb index 4051c34..a4dd38c 100644 --- a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_install:append() { } COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(arm|aarch64).*-linux" +COMPATIBLE_HOST:ti-soc = "null" # Kernel modules currently RDEPEND on the kernel, which is troublesome when you want to put a # kernel module into a initramfs without pulling the kernel into the initramfs, which would be -- 2.36.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs 2022-05-01 18:47 [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs Khem Raj @ 2022-05-03 13:06 ` Jon Mason 2022-05-03 14:48 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jon Mason @ 2022-05-03 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: meta-arm On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 11:47:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 > This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > --- > meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > index 4051c34..a4dd38c 100644 > --- a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_install:append() { > } > > COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(arm|aarch64).*-linux" > +COMPATIBLE_HOST:ti-soc = "null" Shouldn't this live in meta-ti? > > # Kernel modules currently RDEPEND on the kernel, which is troublesome when you want to put a > # kernel module into a initramfs without pulling the kernel into the initramfs, which would be > -- > 2.36.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs 2022-05-03 13:06 ` Jon Mason @ 2022-05-03 14:48 ` Khem Raj 2022-05-03 15:21 ` [meta-arm] " Denys Dmytriyenko 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2022-05-03 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jon Mason; +Cc: meta-arm On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 6:06 AM Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 11:47:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 > > This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > > --- > > meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > index 4051c34..a4dd38c 100644 > > --- a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_install:append() { > > } > > > > COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(arm|aarch64).*-linux" > > +COMPATIBLE_HOST:ti-soc = "null" > > Shouldn't this live in meta-ti? yeah perhaps better there. > > > > > # Kernel modules currently RDEPEND on the kernel, which is troublesome when you want to put a > > # kernel module into a initramfs without pulling the kernel into the initramfs, which would be > > -- > > 2.36.0 > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-arm] [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs 2022-05-03 14:48 ` Khem Raj @ 2022-05-03 15:21 ` Denys Dmytriyenko 2022-05-03 15:54 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2022-05-03 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Jon Mason, meta-arm On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:48:20AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 6:06 AM Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 11:47:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 > > > This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > > index 4051c34..a4dd38c 100644 > > > --- a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_install:append() { > > > } > > > > > > COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(arm|aarch64).*-linux" > > > +COMPATIBLE_HOST:ti-soc = "null" > > > > Shouldn't this live in meta-ti? > > yeah perhaps better there. If the kernel requires patching to use this module from meta-arm, shouldn't meta-arm set a bit stricter COMPATIBLE_HOST? How are other BSPs supposed to work along with meta-arm? > > > # Kernel modules currently RDEPEND on the kernel, which is troublesome when you want to put a > > > # kernel module into a initramfs without pulling the kernel into the initramfs, which would be > > > -- > > > 2.36.0 > > > > > > -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-arm] [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs 2022-05-03 15:21 ` [meta-arm] " Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2022-05-03 15:54 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2022-05-03 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Denys Dmytriyenko; +Cc: Jon Mason, meta-arm On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 8:21 AM Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 07:48:20AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 6:06 AM Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 11:47:31AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > The module can not be compiled without patching kernel 5.10 > > > > This helps meta-ti to live in multi-BSP envs > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > > > index 4051c34..a4dd38c 100644 > > > > --- a/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > > > +++ b/meta-arm/recipes-kernel/ffa-debugfs/ffa-debugfs-mod_2.1.0.bb > > > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_install:append() { > > > > } > > > > > > > > COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(arm|aarch64).*-linux" > > > > +COMPATIBLE_HOST:ti-soc = "null" > > > > > > Shouldn't this live in meta-ti? > > > > yeah perhaps better there. > > If the kernel requires patching to use this module from meta-arm, shouldn't > meta-arm set a bit stricter COMPATIBLE_HOST? How are other BSPs supposed to > work along with meta-arm? I think meta-arm is a base dependency of meta-ti not other way around, so in this case I think its better to fix in meta-ti, since meta-ti is not using the kernel that meta-arm tests so this layer has no control over things downstream layers do. > > > > > > # Kernel modules currently RDEPEND on the kernel, which is troublesome when you want to put a > > > > # kernel module into a initramfs without pulling the kernel into the initramfs, which would be > > > > -- > > > > 2.36.0 > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> > PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 > Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-03 15:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-05-01 18:47 [PATCH] ffa-debugfs-mod: Do not build for TI SOCs Khem Raj 2022-05-03 13:06 ` Jon Mason 2022-05-03 14:48 ` Khem Raj 2022-05-03 15:21 ` [meta-arm] " Denys Dmytriyenko 2022-05-03 15:54 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.