From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH] generic: test fsync of directory with renamed symlink
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 12:32:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220509113243.GA2279159@falcondesktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509111355.nzbg3e2gp3vykvxa@zlang-mailbox>
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 07:13:55PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:03:17AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 11:57:49AM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > >
> > > Test that if we fsync a directory, create a symlink inside it, rename
> > > the symlink, fsync again the directory and then power fail, after the
> > > filesystem is mounted again, the symlink exists with the new name and
> > > it has the correct content.
> > >
> > > This currently fails on btrfs, because the symlink ends up empty (which
> > > is illegal on Linux), but it is fixed by kernel commit:
> > >
> > > d0e64a981fd841 ("btrfs: always log symlinks in full mode")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Resending as this was missed on the last update.
> > > No changes, only rebased on the current 'for-next' branch.
> >
> > Zorro,
> >
> > This missed against the last fstests update.
> > Did this patch fell through the cracks, or do you expect me to do something about it?
> >
> > Should I rebase and resend again?
>
> Oh, this patch is in my "still reviewing" list, I remembered I didn't see any
> RVB/ACK for it, did I miss some emails? If so I missed something please feel
> free to tell me :)
There weren't any reviews, which is not uncommon.
In the past, the maintainers (Eryu, Dave) usually reviewed the patches themselves.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > >
> > > tests/generic/690 | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > tests/generic/690.out | 2 +
> > > 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100755 tests/generic/690
> > > create mode 100644 tests/generic/690.out
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/690 b/tests/generic/690
> > > new file mode 100755
> > > index 00000000..0bf47dd7
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/690
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +# Copyright (c) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> > > +#
> > > +# FS QA Test 690
> > > +#
> > > +# Test that if we fsync a directory, create a symlink inside it, rename the
> > > +# symlink, fsync again the directory and then power fail, after the filesystem
> > > +# is mounted again, the symlink exists with the new name and it has the correct
> > > +# content.
> > > +#
> > > +# On btrfs this used to result in the symlink being empty (i_size 0), and it was
> > > +# fixed by kernel commit:
> > > +#
> > > +# d0e64a981fd841 ("btrfs: always log symlinks in full mode")
> > > +#
> > > +. ./common/preamble
> > > +_begin_fstest auto quick log
> > > +
> > > +_cleanup()
> > > +{
> > > + _cleanup_flakey
> > > + cd /
> > > + rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +. ./common/rc
> > > +. ./common/filter
> > > +. ./common/dmflakey
> > > +
> > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > +
> > > +_supported_fs generic
> > > +_require_scratch
> > > +_require_symlinks
> > > +_require_dm_target flakey
> > > +
> > > +rm -f $seqres.full
> > > +
> > > +# f2fs doesn't support fs-op level transaction functionality, so it has no way
> > > +# to persist all metadata updates in one transaction. We have to use its mount
> > > +# option "fastboot" so that it triggers a metadata checkpoint to persist all
> > > +# metadata updates that happen before a fsync call. Without this, after the
> > > +# last fsync in the test, the symlink named "baz" will not exist.
> > > +if [ $FSTYP = "f2fs" ]; then
> > > + export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o fastboot $MOUNT_OPTIONS"
> > > +fi
> > > +
> > > +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> > > +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> > > +_init_flakey
> > > +_mount_flakey
> > > +
> > > +# Create our test directory.
> > > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir
> > > +
> > > +# Commit the current transaction and persist the directory.
> > > +sync
> > > +
> > > +# Create a file in the test directory, so that the next fsync on the directory
> > > +# actually does something (it logs the directory).
> > > +echo -n > $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo
> > > +
> > > +# Fsync the directory.
> > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir
> > > +
> > > +# Now create a symlink inside the test directory.
> > > +ln -s $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/bar
> > > +
> > > +# Rename the symlink.
> > > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/bar $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/baz
> > > +
> > > +# Fsync again the directory.
> > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir
> > > +
> > > +# Simulate a power failure and then mount again the filesystem to replay the
> > > +# journal/log.
> > > +_flakey_drop_and_remount
> > > +
> > > +# The symlink should exist, with the name "baz" and its content must be
> > > +# "$SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo".
> > > +[ -L $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/baz ] || echo "symlink 'baz' is missing"
> > > +echo "symlink content: $(readlink $SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/baz | _filter_scratch)"
> > > +
> > > +_unmount_flakey
> > > +
> > > +# success, all done
> > > +status=0
> > > +exit
> > > diff --git a/tests/generic/690.out b/tests/generic/690.out
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000..84be1247
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/generic/690.out
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > > +QA output created by 690
> > > +symlink content: SCRATCH_MNT/testdir/foo
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-09 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-03 10:57 [Resend PATCH] generic: test fsync of directory with renamed symlink fdmanana
2022-05-09 10:03 ` Filipe Manana
2022-05-09 11:13 ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-09 11:32 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-05-09 13:08 ` Zorro Lang
2022-05-09 12:15 ` David Disseldorp
2022-05-09 12:45 ` Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220509113243.GA2279159@falcondesktop \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.