All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 07/10] x86/mm: Handle tagged memory accesses from kernel threads
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 09:23:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511072310.GU76023@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511022751.65540-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 05:27:48AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> When a kernel thread performs memory access on behalf of a process (like
> in async I/O, io_uring, etc.) it has to respect tagging setup of the
> process as user addresses can include tags.
> 
> Normally, LAM setup is per-thread and recorded in thread features, but
> for this use case kernel also tracks LAM setup per-mm. mm->context.lam
> would record LAM that allows the most tag bits among the threads of
> the mm.

Then why does it *ever* make sense to track it per thread? It's not like
it makes heaps of sense to allow one thread in a process to use LAM but
not the others.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11  2:27 [RFCv2 00/10] Linear Address Masking enabling Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [PATCH] x86: Implement Linear Address Masking support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-12 13:01   ` David Laight
2022-05-12 14:07     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-12 15:06       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 15:33         ` David Laight
2022-05-12 14:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-12 17:00     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 01/10] x86/mm: Fix CR3_ADDR_MASK Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 02/10] x86: CPUID and CR3/CR4 flags for Linear Address Masking Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 03/10] x86: Introduce userspace API to handle per-thread features Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-12 12:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 12:04     ` [PATCH] x86/prctl: Remove pointless task argument Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 12:30       ` [tip: x86/cleanups] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 14:09   ` [RFCv2 03/10] x86: Introduce userspace API to handle per-thread features Alexander Potapenko
2022-05-13 17:34     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-05-13 23:09       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-13 23:50         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-05-14  8:37           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-14 23:06             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-05-15  9:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-15 18:24                 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-05-15 19:38                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-15 22:01                     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 04/10] x86/mm: Introduce X86_THREAD_LAM_U48 and X86_THREAD_LAM_U57 Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  7:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-12 12:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 14:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 05/10] x86/mm: Provide untagged_addr() helper Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  7:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-11  7:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-12 13:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 14:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-12 15:16       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 23:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 10:14           ` David Laight
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 06/10] x86/uaccess: Remove tags from the address before checking Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-12 13:02   ` David Laight
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 07/10] x86/mm: Handle tagged memory accesses from kernel threads Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  7:23   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-05-12 13:30   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 08/10] x86/mm: Make LAM_U48 and mappings above 47-bits mutually exclusive Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-12 13:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 23:22     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-14  8:37       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-18  8:43   ` Bharata B Rao
2022-05-18 17:08     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 09/10] x86/mm: Add userspace API to enable Linear Address Masking Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  7:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-12 14:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-11 14:15   ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-12 14:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-11  2:27 ` [RFCv2 10/10] x86: Expose thread features status in /proc/$PID/arch_status Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-11  6:49 ` [RFCv2 00/10] Linear Address Masking enabling Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-12 15:42   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 16:56     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-12 19:31       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 23:21         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 17:22   ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-12 19:39     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-12 21:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 14:43         ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 22:59         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-12 21:51       ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-12 22:10         ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-12 23:35           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13  0:08             ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-13  0:46               ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-13  1:27                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13  3:05                   ` Dave Hansen
2022-05-13  8:28                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 22:48                     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-13  9:14                   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-13  9:26                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13  0:46               ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-13 11:07         ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-05-13 11:28           ` David Laight
2022-05-13 12:26             ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-05-13 14:26               ` David Laight
2022-05-13 15:28                 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-05-13 23:01           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-05-14 10:00             ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220511072310.GU76023@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.