From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 17:59:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220516175909.7b69c344@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220516090702.1939253-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 16 May 2022 11:07:02 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Upon migration, we expect storage keys being set by the guest to be preserved,
> so add a test for it.
>
> We keep 128 pages and set predictable storage keys. Then, we migrate and check
> they can be read back and the respective access restrictions are in place when
> the access key in the PSW doesn't match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> s390x/migration-skey.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/unittests.cfg | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 s390x/migration-skey.c
>
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index a8e04aa6fe4d..f8ea594b641d 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/epsw.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration.elf
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-attest.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-skey.elf
>
> pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
>
> diff --git a/s390x/migration-skey.c b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ee4622eb94ba
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/migration-skey.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Storage Key migration tests
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/mem.h>
> +#include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <hardware.h>
> +
> +#define NUM_PAGES 128
> +static uint8_t pagebuf[NUM_PAGES][PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE)));
> +
> +static void test_migration(void)
> +{
> + int i, key_to_set;
> + uint8_t *page;
> + union skey expected_key, actual_key;
please reverse Christmas tree ^
with that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> + /*
> + * Storage keys are 7 bit, lowest bit is always returned as zero
> + * by iske
> + */
> + key_to_set = i * 2;
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf[i], key_to_set, 1);
> + }
> +
> + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> + (void)getchar();
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_PAGES; i++) {
> + report_prefix_pushf("page %d", i);
> +
> + page = &pagebuf[i][0];
> + actual_key.val = get_storage_key(page);
> + expected_key.val = i * 2;
> +
> + /* ignore reference bit */
> + actual_key.str.rf = 0;
> + expected_key.str.rf = 0;
> +
> + report(actual_key.val == expected_key.val, "expected_key=0x%x actual_key=0x%x", expected_key.val, actual_key.val);
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + report_prefix_push("migration-skey");
> + if (test_facility(169)) {
> + report_skip("storage key removal facility is active");
> +
> + /*
> + * If we just exit and don't ask migrate_cmd to migrate us, it
> + * will just hang forever. Hence, also ask for migration when we
> + * skip this test altogether.
> + */
> + puts("Please migrate me, then press return\n");
> + (void)getchar();
> +
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + test_migration();
> +
> +done:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> index b456b2881448..1e851d8e3dd8 100644
> --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> @@ -176,3 +176,7 @@ extra_params = -cpu qemu,gs=off,vx=off
> file = migration.elf
> groups = migration
> smp = 2
> +
> +[migration-skey]
> +file = migration-skey.elf
> +groups = migration
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-16 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-16 9:07 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/1] s390x: add migration test for storage keys Nico Boehr
2022-05-16 9:07 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/1] " Nico Boehr
2022-05-16 15:59 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2022-05-16 16:47 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 8:17 ` Nico Boehr
2022-05-17 11:44 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-17 11:53 ` Nico Boehr
2022-05-17 12:29 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220516175909.7b69c344@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.