All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 20:52:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526015240.GA2884362-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524055042.1527968-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:20:42AM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
> in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and the
> ima-kexec-buffer was allocated beyond that range by the previous kernel.
> The panic is usually of the form below:
> 
> $ sudo kexec --initrd initrd vmlinux --append='mem=16G'
> 
> <snip>
>  BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc000c01fff7f0000
>  Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000837974
>  Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> <snip>
>  NIP [c000000000837974] ima_restore_measurement_list+0x94/0x6c0
>  LR [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
>  Call Trace:
>  [c00000000371fa80] [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
>  [c00000000371fb00] [c0000000020512c4] ima_init+0x80/0x108
>  [c00000000371fb70] [c0000000020514dc] init_ima+0x4c/0x120
>  [c00000000371fbf0] [c000000000012240] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x2c0
>  [c00000000371fcc0] [c000000002004ad0] kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x3ec
>  [c00000000371fda0] [c0000000000128a4] kernel_init+0x34/0x1b0
>  [c00000000371fe10] [c00000000000ce64] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64
>  Instruction dump:
>  f92100b8 f92100c0 90e10090 910100a0 4182050c 282a0017 3bc00000 40810330
>  7c0802a6 fb610198 7c9b2378 f80101d0 <a1240000> 2c090001 40820614 e9240010
>  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fix this issue by checking returned PFN range of previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer with pfn_valid to ensure correct memory bounds.
> 
> Fixes: 467d27824920 ("powerpc: ima: get the kexec buffer passed by the previous kernel")
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> Cc: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> ---
> Changelog
> ==========
> 
> v2:
> * Instead of using memblock to determine the valid bounds use pfn_valid() to do
> so since memblock may not be available late after the kernel init. [ Mpe ]
> * Changed the patch prefix from 'powerpc' to 'of' [ Mpe ]
> * Updated the 'Fixes' tag to point to correct commit that introduced this
> function. [ Rob ]
> * Fixed some whitespace/tab issues in the patch description [ Rob ]
> * Added another check for checking ig 'tmp_size' for ima-kexec-buffer is > 0
> ---
>  drivers/of/kexec.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/kexec.c b/drivers/of/kexec.c
> index 8d374cc552be..879e984fe901 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/kexec.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/kexec.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
>  {
>  	int ret, len;
>  	unsigned long tmp_addr;
> +	unsigned int start_pfn, end_pfn;
>  	size_t tmp_size;
>  	const void *prop;
>  
> @@ -140,6 +141,22 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	/* Do some sanity on the returned size for the ima-kexec buffer */
> +	if (!tmp_size)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the PFNs for the buffer and ensure
> +	 * they are with in addressable memory.
> +	 */
> +	start_pfn = PHYS_PFN(tmp_addr);
> +	end_pfn = PHYS_PFN(tmp_addr + tmp_size - 1);
> +	if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn) || !pfn_valid(end_pfn)) {

pfn_valid() isn't necessarily RAM, only that you have a struct page 
AIUI. Maybe page_is_ram() instead?

Thanks to Robin for this.

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 20:52:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526015240.GA2884362-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524055042.1527968-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:20:42AM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
> in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and the
> ima-kexec-buffer was allocated beyond that range by the previous kernel.
> The panic is usually of the form below:
> 
> $ sudo kexec --initrd initrd vmlinux --append='mem=16G'
> 
> <snip>
>  BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc000c01fff7f0000
>  Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000837974
>  Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> <snip>
>  NIP [c000000000837974] ima_restore_measurement_list+0x94/0x6c0
>  LR [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
>  Call Trace:
>  [c00000000371fa80] [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
>  [c00000000371fb00] [c0000000020512c4] ima_init+0x80/0x108
>  [c00000000371fb70] [c0000000020514dc] init_ima+0x4c/0x120
>  [c00000000371fbf0] [c000000000012240] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x2c0
>  [c00000000371fcc0] [c000000002004ad0] kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x3ec
>  [c00000000371fda0] [c0000000000128a4] kernel_init+0x34/0x1b0
>  [c00000000371fe10] [c00000000000ce64] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64
>  Instruction dump:
>  f92100b8 f92100c0 90e10090 910100a0 4182050c 282a0017 3bc00000 40810330
>  7c0802a6 fb610198 7c9b2378 f80101d0 <a1240000> 2c090001 40820614 e9240010
>  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fix this issue by checking returned PFN range of previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer with pfn_valid to ensure correct memory bounds.
> 
> Fixes: 467d27824920 ("powerpc: ima: get the kexec buffer passed by the previous kernel")
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> Cc: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@linux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> ---
> Changelog
> ==========
> 
> v2:
> * Instead of using memblock to determine the valid bounds use pfn_valid() to do
> so since memblock may not be available late after the kernel init. [ Mpe ]
> * Changed the patch prefix from 'powerpc' to 'of' [ Mpe ]
> * Updated the 'Fixes' tag to point to correct commit that introduced this
> function. [ Rob ]
> * Fixed some whitespace/tab issues in the patch description [ Rob ]
> * Added another check for checking ig 'tmp_size' for ima-kexec-buffer is > 0
> ---
>  drivers/of/kexec.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/kexec.c b/drivers/of/kexec.c
> index 8d374cc552be..879e984fe901 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/kexec.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/kexec.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
>  {
>  	int ret, len;
>  	unsigned long tmp_addr;
> +	unsigned int start_pfn, end_pfn;
>  	size_t tmp_size;
>  	const void *prop;
>  
> @@ -140,6 +141,22 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	/* Do some sanity on the returned size for the ima-kexec buffer */
> +	if (!tmp_size)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the PFNs for the buffer and ensure
> +	 * they are with in addressable memory.
> +	 */
> +	start_pfn = PHYS_PFN(tmp_addr);
> +	end_pfn = PHYS_PFN(tmp_addr + tmp_size - 1);
> +	if (!pfn_valid(start_pfn) || !pfn_valid(end_pfn)) {

pfn_valid() isn't necessarily RAM, only that you have a struct page 
AIUI. Maybe page_is_ram() instead?

Thanks to Robin for this.

Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24  5:50 [PATCH v2] of: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-24  5:50 ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-25  5:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-05-25  5:51   ` Ritesh Harjani
2022-05-25  7:46   ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-25  7:46     ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-26  1:52 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-05-26  1:52   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-31  5:27   ` Vaibhav Jain
2022-05-31  5:27     ` Vaibhav Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220526015240.GA2884362-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=prsriva@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.