From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Harden _regs accesses to guard against buggy input
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 08:39:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202205260835.9BC23703@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220525222604.2810054-3-seanjc@google.com>
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:26:02PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> WARN and truncate the incoming GPR number/index when reading/writing GPRs
> in the emulator to guard against KVM bugs, e.g. to avoid out-of-bounds
> accesses to ctxt->_regs[] if KVM generates a bogus index. Truncate the
> index instead of returning e.g. zero, as reg_write() returns a pointer
> to the register, i.e. returning zero would result in a NULL pointer
> dereference. KVM could also force the index to any arbitrary GPR, but
> that's no better or worse, just different.
>
> Open code the restriction to 16 registers; RIP is handled via _eip and
> should never be accessed through reg_read() or reg_write(). See the
> comments above the declarations of reg_read() and reg_write(), and the
> behavior of writeback_registers(). The horrific open coded mess will be
> cleaned up in a future commit.
>
> There are no such bugs known to exist in the emulator, but determining
> that KVM is bug-free is not at all simple and requires a deep dive into
> the emulator. The code is so convoluted that GCC-12 with the recently
> enable -Warray-bounds spits out a (suspected) false-positive:
>
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:254:27: warning: array subscript 32 is above array
> bounds of 'long unsigned int[17]' [-Warray-bounds]
I can confirm this is one of the instances of the now-isolated GCC 12
bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Regardless, I think the cleanup is still useful from a robustness
perspective. Better to be as defensive as possible in KVM. :)
> 254 | return ctxt->_regs[nr];
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> In file included from arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:23:
> arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h: In function 'reg_rmw':
> arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h:366:23: note: while referencing '_regs'
> 366 | unsigned long _regs[NR_VCPU_REGS];
> | ^~~~~
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YofQlBrlx18J7h9Y@google.com
> Cc: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 7226a127ccb4..c58366ae4da2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ enum x86_transfer_type {
>
> static ulong reg_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
> {
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= 16))
> + nr &= 16 - 1;
Instead of doing a modulo here, what about forcing it into an "unused"
slot?
i.e. define _regs as an array of [16 + 1], and:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= 16)
nr = 16;
Then there is both no out-of-bounds access, but also no weird "actual"
register indexed?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-25 22:26 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Emulator _regs fixes and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Grab regs_dirty in local 'unsigned long' Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 14:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-05-26 15:33 ` Kees Cook
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Harden _regs accesses to guard against buggy input Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 14:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-05-26 15:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 15:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-05-26 15:39 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-05-26 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Omit VCPU_REGS_RIP from emulator's _regs array Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 2:55 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-26 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Use 16-bit fields to track dirty/valid emulator GPRs Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 15:41 ` Kees Cook
2022-05-26 1:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Emulator _regs fixes and cleanups Robert Dinse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202205260835.9BC23703@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nanook@eskimo.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.