All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Harden _regs accesses to guard against buggy input
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 16:07:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r14gqte2.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220525222604.2810054-3-seanjc@google.com>

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:

> WARN and truncate the incoming GPR number/index when reading/writing GPRs
> in the emulator to guard against KVM bugs, e.g. to avoid out-of-bounds
> accesses to ctxt->_regs[] if KVM generates a bogus index.  Truncate the
> index instead of returning e.g. zero, as reg_write() returns a pointer
> to the register, i.e. returning zero would result in a NULL pointer
> dereference.  KVM could also force the index to any arbitrary GPR, but
> that's no better or worse, just different.
>
> Open code the restriction to 16 registers; RIP is handled via _eip and
> should never be accessed through reg_read() or reg_write().  See the
> comments above the declarations of reg_read() and reg_write(), and the
> behavior of writeback_registers().  The horrific open coded mess will be
> cleaned up in a future commit.
>
> There are no such bugs known to exist in the emulator, but determining
> that KVM is bug-free is not at all simple and requires a deep dive into
> the emulator.  The code is so convoluted that GCC-12 with the recently
> enable -Warray-bounds spits out a (suspected) false-positive:
>
>   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:254:27: warning: array subscript 32 is above array
>                                  bounds of 'long unsigned int[17]' [-Warray-bounds]
>     254 |         return ctxt->_regs[nr];
>         |                ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
>   In file included from arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:23:
>   arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h: In function 'reg_rmw':
>   arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h:366:23: note: while referencing '_regs'
>     366 |         unsigned long _regs[NR_VCPU_REGS];
>         |                       ^~~~~
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YofQlBrlx18J7h9Y@google.com
> Cc: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 7226a127ccb4..c58366ae4da2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ enum x86_transfer_type {
>  
>  static ulong reg_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
>  {
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= 16))
> +		nr &= 16 - 1;

As the result of this is unlikely to match the expectation (and I'm
unsure what's the expectation here in the first place :-), why not use 
KVM_BUG_ON() here instead?

> +
>  	if (!(ctxt->regs_valid & (1 << nr))) {
>  		ctxt->regs_valid |= 1 << nr;
>  		ctxt->_regs[nr] = ctxt->ops->read_gpr(ctxt, nr);
> @@ -256,6 +259,9 @@ static ulong reg_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
>  
>  static ulong *reg_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
>  {
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= 16))
> +		nr &= 16 - 1;
> +
>  	ctxt->regs_valid |= 1 << nr;
>  	ctxt->regs_dirty |= 1 << nr;
>  	return &ctxt->_regs[nr];

-- 
Vitaly


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-25 22:26 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Emulator _regs fixes and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: Grab regs_dirty in local 'unsigned long' Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 14:04   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-05-26 15:33   ` Kees Cook
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Harden _regs accesses to guard against buggy input Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 14:07   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-05-26 15:49     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 15:58       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-05-26 15:39   ` Kees Cook
2022-05-26 16:01     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Omit VCPU_REGS_RIP from emulator's _regs array Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26  2:55   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-26 15:47     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 15:47       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-25 22:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: Use 16-bit fields to track dirty/valid emulator GPRs Sean Christopherson
2022-05-26 15:41   ` Kees Cook
2022-05-26  1:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: Emulator _regs fixes and cleanups Robert Dinse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r14gqte2.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nanook@eskimo.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.