All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@samsung.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/pseries: use of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc()
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:14:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220603201407.GA688883-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220601081801.348571-5-clement.leger@bootlin.com>

On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:18:01AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Use of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc() to create and free
> device-tree nodes and properties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c        | 51 +++----------------
>  .../platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c        | 21 +-------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c     | 45 +++++-----------
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> index 498d6efcb5ae..5a04566e98a4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> @@ -38,61 +38,25 @@ struct cc_workarea {
>  	__be32	prop_offset;
>  };
>  
> -void dlpar_free_cc_property(struct property *prop)
> -{
> -	kfree(prop->name);
> -	kfree(prop->value);
> -	kfree(prop);
> -}
> -
>  static struct property *dlpar_parse_cc_property(struct cc_workarea *ccwa)
>  {
> -	struct property *prop;
> -	char *name;
> -	char *value;
> -
> -	prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!prop)
> -		return NULL;
> +	int length;
> +	char *name, *value;
>  
>  	name = (char *)ccwa + be32_to_cpu(ccwa->name_offset);
> -	prop->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!prop->name) {
> -		dlpar_free_cc_property(prop);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	prop->length = be32_to_cpu(ccwa->prop_length);
> +	length = be32_to_cpu(ccwa->prop_length);
>  	value = (char *)ccwa + be32_to_cpu(ccwa->prop_offset);
> -	prop->value = kmemdup(value, prop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!prop->value) {
> -		dlpar_free_cc_property(prop);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
>  
> -	return prop;
> +	return of_property_alloc(name, value, length, GFP_KERNEL);
>  }
>  
>  static struct device_node *dlpar_parse_cc_node(struct cc_workarea *ccwa)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *dn;
>  	const char *name;
>  
> -	dn = kzalloc(sizeof(*dn), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dn)
> -		return NULL;
> -
>  	name = (const char *)ccwa + be32_to_cpu(ccwa->name_offset);
> -	dn->full_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dn->full_name) {
> -		kfree(dn);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
>  
> -	of_node_set_flag(dn, OF_DYNAMIC);
> -	of_node_init(dn);
> -
> -	return dn;
> +	return of_node_alloc(name, GFP_KERNEL);

Do you have any need for different flags? I can't really see a need for 
atomic or dma allocs or ???, so drop it I think.

>  }
>  
>  static void dlpar_free_one_cc_node(struct device_node *dn)
> @@ -102,11 +66,10 @@ static void dlpar_free_one_cc_node(struct device_node *dn)
>  	while (dn->properties) {
>  		prop = dn->properties;
>  		dn->properties = prop->next;
> -		dlpar_free_cc_property(prop);
> +		of_property_free(prop);

We should be able to just put the node and all the properties already 
attached will be freed.

Looking at the history of this code, it originally did the kref_init 
much later in dlpar_attach_node(). So there was a window of allocating 
the node and adding properties where you'd need to manually free 
everything. Now that the node is referenced from the start, a put should 
free everything.

>  	}
>  
> -	kfree(dn->full_name);
> -	kfree(dn);
> +	of_node_put(dn);
>  }
>  
>  void dlpar_free_cc_nodes(struct device_node *dn)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index 2e3a317722a8..2ddf2a0ba048 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -69,33 +69,16 @@ unsigned long pseries_memory_block_size(void)
>  	return memblock_size;
>  }
>  
> -static void dlpar_free_property(struct property *prop)
> -{
> -	kfree(prop->name);
> -	kfree(prop->value);
> -	kfree(prop);
> -}
> -
>  static struct property *dlpar_clone_property(struct property *prop,
>  					     u32 prop_size)
>  {
> -	struct property *new_prop;
> -
> -	new_prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct property *new_prop = of_property_alloc(prop->name, NULL,
> +						      prop_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!new_prop)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	new_prop->name = kstrdup(prop->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	new_prop->value = kzalloc(prop_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!new_prop->name || !new_prop->value) {
> -		dlpar_free_property(new_prop);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	memcpy(new_prop->value, prop->value, prop->length);
> -	new_prop->length = prop_size;
>  
> -	of_property_set_flag(new_prop, OF_DYNAMIC);
>  	return new_prop;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
> index cad7a0c93117..f1a364995e82 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
> @@ -24,17 +24,9 @@ static int pSeries_reconfig_add_node(const char *path, struct property *proplist
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	int err = -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	np = of_node_alloc(kbasename(path), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!np)
> -		goto out_err;
> -
> -	np->full_name = kstrdup(kbasename(path), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!np->full_name)
> -		goto out_err;
> -
> -	np->properties = proplist;
> -	of_node_set_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC);
> -	of_node_init(np);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	np->parent = pseries_of_derive_parent(path);
>  	if (IS_ERR(np->parent)) {
> @@ -55,8 +47,7 @@ static int pSeries_reconfig_add_node(const char *path, struct property *proplist
>  out_err:
>  	if (np) {
>  		of_node_put(np->parent);
> -		kfree(np->full_name);
> -		kfree(np);
> +		of_node_put(np);
>  	}
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -91,9 +82,7 @@ static void release_prop_list(const struct property *prop)
>  	struct property *next;
>  	for (; prop; prop = next) {
>  		next = prop->next;
> -		kfree(prop->name);
> -		kfree(prop->value);
> -		kfree(prop);
> +		of_property_free(prop);

Looks like you need this because code does: alloc properties, alloc 
node, add properties, attach node. It would need to be refactored to 
alloc the node first, but that's a bit more complex needing someone to 
test on pSeries.

>  	}
>  
>  }
> @@ -167,27 +156,17 @@ static char * parse_next_property(char *buf, char *end, char **name, int *length
>  static struct property *new_property(const char *name, const int length,
>  				     const unsigned char *value, struct property *last)
>  {
> -	struct property *new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct property *prop;
>  
> -	if (!new)
> +	prop = of_property_alloc(name, NULL, length + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!prop)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (!(new->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL)))
> -		goto cleanup;
> -	if (!(new->value = kmalloc(length + 1, GFP_KERNEL)))
> -		goto cleanup;
> -
> -	memcpy(new->value, value, length);
> -	*(((char *)new->value) + length) = 0;
> -	new->length = length;
> -	new->next = last;
> -	return new;
> -
> -cleanup:
> -	kfree(new->name);
> -	kfree(new->value);
> -	kfree(new);
> -	return NULL;
> +	memcpy(prop->value, value, length);
> +	*(((char *)prop->value) + length) = 0;

Looks to me like this could be avoided with this change:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
index cad7a0c93117..614753fc5f27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static char * parse_next_property(char *buf, char *end, char **name, int *length
        /* now we're on the value */
        *value = tmp;
        tmp += *length;
-       if (tmp > end) {
+       if (tmp >= end) {
                printk(KERN_ERR "property parse failed in %s at line %d\n",
                       __func__, __LINE__);
                return NULL;
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static char * parse_next_property(char *buf, char *end, char **name, int *length
                       __func__, __LINE__);
                return NULL;
        }
+       *tmp = '\0';
        tmp++;
 
        /* and now we should be on the next name, or the end */


Based on the comments, 'buf' should be nul terminated, so I would think 
that tmp == end would be an error. But I really don't know.

Really need some pSeries people to comment on all this.

Another option is if value is NULL, then of_property_alloc() should 
ensure the buffer is zeroed. Then you just need the memcpy.

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@samsung.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/pseries: use of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc()
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:14:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220603201407.GA688883-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220601081801.348571-5-clement.leger@bootlin.com>

On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:18:01AM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> Use of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc() to create and free
> device-tree nodes and properties.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c        | 51 +++----------------
>  .../platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c        | 21 +-------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c     | 45 +++++-----------
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> index 498d6efcb5ae..5a04566e98a4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
> @@ -38,61 +38,25 @@ struct cc_workarea {
>  	__be32	prop_offset;
>  };
>  
> -void dlpar_free_cc_property(struct property *prop)
> -{
> -	kfree(prop->name);
> -	kfree(prop->value);
> -	kfree(prop);
> -}
> -
>  static struct property *dlpar_parse_cc_property(struct cc_workarea *ccwa)
>  {
> -	struct property *prop;
> -	char *name;
> -	char *value;
> -
> -	prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!prop)
> -		return NULL;
> +	int length;
> +	char *name, *value;
>  
>  	name = (char *)ccwa + be32_to_cpu(ccwa->name_offset);
> -	prop->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!prop->name) {
> -		dlpar_free_cc_property(prop);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	prop->length = be32_to_cpu(ccwa->prop_length);
> +	length = be32_to_cpu(ccwa->prop_length);
>  	value = (char *)ccwa + be32_to_cpu(ccwa->prop_offset);
> -	prop->value = kmemdup(value, prop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!prop->value) {
> -		dlpar_free_cc_property(prop);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
>  
> -	return prop;
> +	return of_property_alloc(name, value, length, GFP_KERNEL);
>  }
>  
>  static struct device_node *dlpar_parse_cc_node(struct cc_workarea *ccwa)
>  {
> -	struct device_node *dn;
>  	const char *name;
>  
> -	dn = kzalloc(sizeof(*dn), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dn)
> -		return NULL;
> -
>  	name = (const char *)ccwa + be32_to_cpu(ccwa->name_offset);
> -	dn->full_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dn->full_name) {
> -		kfree(dn);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
>  
> -	of_node_set_flag(dn, OF_DYNAMIC);
> -	of_node_init(dn);
> -
> -	return dn;
> +	return of_node_alloc(name, GFP_KERNEL);

Do you have any need for different flags? I can't really see a need for 
atomic or dma allocs or ???, so drop it I think.

>  }
>  
>  static void dlpar_free_one_cc_node(struct device_node *dn)
> @@ -102,11 +66,10 @@ static void dlpar_free_one_cc_node(struct device_node *dn)
>  	while (dn->properties) {
>  		prop = dn->properties;
>  		dn->properties = prop->next;
> -		dlpar_free_cc_property(prop);
> +		of_property_free(prop);

We should be able to just put the node and all the properties already 
attached will be freed.

Looking at the history of this code, it originally did the kref_init 
much later in dlpar_attach_node(). So there was a window of allocating 
the node and adding properties where you'd need to manually free 
everything. Now that the node is referenced from the start, a put should 
free everything.

>  	}
>  
> -	kfree(dn->full_name);
> -	kfree(dn);
> +	of_node_put(dn);
>  }
>  
>  void dlpar_free_cc_nodes(struct device_node *dn)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index 2e3a317722a8..2ddf2a0ba048 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -69,33 +69,16 @@ unsigned long pseries_memory_block_size(void)
>  	return memblock_size;
>  }
>  
> -static void dlpar_free_property(struct property *prop)
> -{
> -	kfree(prop->name);
> -	kfree(prop->value);
> -	kfree(prop);
> -}
> -
>  static struct property *dlpar_clone_property(struct property *prop,
>  					     u32 prop_size)
>  {
> -	struct property *new_prop;
> -
> -	new_prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct property *new_prop = of_property_alloc(prop->name, NULL,
> +						      prop_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!new_prop)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	new_prop->name = kstrdup(prop->name, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	new_prop->value = kzalloc(prop_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!new_prop->name || !new_prop->value) {
> -		dlpar_free_property(new_prop);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	memcpy(new_prop->value, prop->value, prop->length);
> -	new_prop->length = prop_size;
>  
> -	of_property_set_flag(new_prop, OF_DYNAMIC);
>  	return new_prop;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
> index cad7a0c93117..f1a364995e82 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
> @@ -24,17 +24,9 @@ static int pSeries_reconfig_add_node(const char *path, struct property *proplist
>  	struct device_node *np;
>  	int err = -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	np = kzalloc(sizeof(*np), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	np = of_node_alloc(kbasename(path), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!np)
> -		goto out_err;
> -
> -	np->full_name = kstrdup(kbasename(path), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!np->full_name)
> -		goto out_err;
> -
> -	np->properties = proplist;
> -	of_node_set_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC);
> -	of_node_init(np);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	np->parent = pseries_of_derive_parent(path);
>  	if (IS_ERR(np->parent)) {
> @@ -55,8 +47,7 @@ static int pSeries_reconfig_add_node(const char *path, struct property *proplist
>  out_err:
>  	if (np) {
>  		of_node_put(np->parent);
> -		kfree(np->full_name);
> -		kfree(np);
> +		of_node_put(np);
>  	}
>  	return err;
>  }
> @@ -91,9 +82,7 @@ static void release_prop_list(const struct property *prop)
>  	struct property *next;
>  	for (; prop; prop = next) {
>  		next = prop->next;
> -		kfree(prop->name);
> -		kfree(prop->value);
> -		kfree(prop);
> +		of_property_free(prop);

Looks like you need this because code does: alloc properties, alloc 
node, add properties, attach node. It would need to be refactored to 
alloc the node first, but that's a bit more complex needing someone to 
test on pSeries.

>  	}
>  
>  }
> @@ -167,27 +156,17 @@ static char * parse_next_property(char *buf, char *end, char **name, int *length
>  static struct property *new_property(const char *name, const int length,
>  				     const unsigned char *value, struct property *last)
>  {
> -	struct property *new = kzalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct property *prop;
>  
> -	if (!new)
> +	prop = of_property_alloc(name, NULL, length + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!prop)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (!(new->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL)))
> -		goto cleanup;
> -	if (!(new->value = kmalloc(length + 1, GFP_KERNEL)))
> -		goto cleanup;
> -
> -	memcpy(new->value, value, length);
> -	*(((char *)new->value) + length) = 0;
> -	new->length = length;
> -	new->next = last;
> -	return new;
> -
> -cleanup:
> -	kfree(new->name);
> -	kfree(new->value);
> -	kfree(new);
> -	return NULL;
> +	memcpy(prop->value, value, length);
> +	*(((char *)prop->value) + length) = 0;

Looks to me like this could be avoided with this change:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
index cad7a0c93117..614753fc5f27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static char * parse_next_property(char *buf, char *end, char **name, int *length
        /* now we're on the value */
        *value = tmp;
        tmp += *length;
-       if (tmp > end) {
+       if (tmp >= end) {
                printk(KERN_ERR "property parse failed in %s at line %d\n",
                       __func__, __LINE__);
                return NULL;
@@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static char * parse_next_property(char *buf, char *end, char **name, int *length
                       __func__, __LINE__);
                return NULL;
        }
+       *tmp = '\0';
        tmp++;
 
        /* and now we should be on the next name, or the end */


Based on the comments, 'buf' should be nul terminated, so I would think 
that tmp == end would be an error. But I really don't know.

Really need some pSeries people to comment on all this.

Another option is if value is NULL, then of_property_alloc() should 
ensure the buffer is zeroed. Then you just need the memcpy.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-03 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-01  8:17 [PATCH v2 0/4] of: add of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc() Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:17 ` Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] of: constify of_property_check_flags() prop argument Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:17   ` Clément Léger
2022-06-03 20:24   ` Rob Herring
2022-06-03 20:24     ` Rob Herring
2022-06-01  8:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] of: dynamic: add of_property_alloc() and of_property_free() Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:17   ` Clément Léger
2022-06-01 22:32   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-06-01 22:32     ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-06-02  6:58     ` Clément Léger
2022-06-02  6:58       ` Clément Léger
2022-06-02 18:10       ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-06-02 18:10         ` Tyrel Datwyler
2022-06-01  8:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] of: dynamic: add of_node_alloc() Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:18   ` Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/pseries: use of_property_alloc/free() and of_node_alloc() Clément Léger
2022-06-01  8:18   ` Clément Léger
2022-06-03 20:14   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-06-03 20:14     ` Rob Herring
2022-06-06  8:45     ` Clément Léger
2022-06-06  8:45       ` Clément Léger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220603201407.GA688883-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@xilinx.com \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ohoono.kwon@samsung.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.