All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: abel.vesa@nxp.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] clk: imx93: Correct the edma1's parent clock
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220616001604.D4C3CC3411A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqpRjwTVZU12H4Gb@ryzen>

Quoting Abel Vesa (2022-06-15 14:39:27)
> On 22-06-09 21:28:58, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
> >
> > For EDMA1 in AONMIX, its parent clock should be from cm33_root,
> > so Correct it.
> >
> > Fixes: 24defbe194b65("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
> > Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> The reviews done internally do no count in upstream.
> I think that's the rule. So drop the R-b tags from all patches.
> Keep only the S-o-b tags.

Is it any different code from what is sent upstream here? If not any
different then I don't think anything is stopping the review tags from
being kept.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: abel.vesa@nxp.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] clk: imx93: Correct the edma1's parent clock
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220616001604.D4C3CC3411A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqpRjwTVZU12H4Gb@ryzen>

Quoting Abel Vesa (2022-06-15 14:39:27)
> On 22-06-09 21:28:58, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
> >
> > For EDMA1 in AONMIX, its parent clock should be from cm33_root,
> > so Correct it.
> >
> > Fixes: 24defbe194b65("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk")
> > Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> The reviews done internally do no count in upstream.
> I think that's the rule. So drop the R-b tags from all patches.
> Keep only the S-o-b tags.

Is it any different code from what is sent upstream here? If not any
different then I don't think anything is stopping the review tags from
being kept.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09 13:28 [PATCH 0/7] clk: imx93: pll/imx93 fixes and update Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:28 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] clk: imx93: use adc_root as the parent clock of adc1 Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:28   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-15 21:31   ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-15 21:31     ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-09 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] clk: imx93: correct nic_media parent Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:28   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-15 21:33   ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-15 21:33     ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-09 13:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] clk: imx93: Correct the edma1's parent clock Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:28   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-15 21:39   ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-15 21:39     ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-16  0:16     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2022-06-16  0:16       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-06-16  3:58       ` Peng Fan
2022-06-16  3:58         ` Peng Fan
2022-06-16 14:18         ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-16 14:18           ` Abel Vesa
2022-06-09 13:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] clk: imx: clk-fracn-gppll: fix mfd value Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:28   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] clk: imx: clk-fracn-gppll: Return rate in rate table properly in ->recalc_rate() Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:29   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] clk: imx: clk-fracn-gppll: correct rdiv Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:29   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] clk: imx: clk-fracn-gppll: Add more freq config for video pll Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-09 13:29   ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-06-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] clk: imx93: pll/imx93 fixes and update Abel Vesa
2022-06-16 16:01   ` Abel Vesa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220616001604.D4C3CC3411A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.