All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: simon.horman@corigine.com, kurt@linutronix.de, paulb@nvidia.com,
	edumazet@google.com, boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com,
	elic@nvidia.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, zhangkaiheb@126.com, pablo@netfilter.org,
	baowen.zheng@corigine.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
	komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, gustavoars@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] flow_dissector: Add PPPoE dissectors
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:01:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624150126.2386014-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624134134.13605-2-marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>

From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:41:31 +0200

> From: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> 
> Allow to dissect PPPoE specific fields which are:
> - session ID (16 bits)
> - ppp protocol (16 bits)
> 
> The goal is to make the following TC command possible:
> 
>   # tc filter add dev ens6f0 ingress prio 1 protocol ppp_ses \
>       flower \
>         pppoe_sid 12 \
>         ppp_proto ip \
>       action drop
> 
> Note that only PPPoE Session is supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/net/flow_dissector.h | 11 ++++++++
>  net/core/flow_dissector.c    | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/flow_dissector.h b/include/net/flow_dissector.h
> index a4c6057c7097..8ff40c7c3f1c 100644
> --- a/include/net/flow_dissector.h
> +++ b/include/net/flow_dissector.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,16 @@ struct flow_dissector_key_num_of_vlans {
>  	u8 num_of_vlans;
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe:
> + * @session_id: pppoe session id
> + * @ppp_proto: ppp protocol
> + */
> +struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe {
> +	u16 session_id;
> +	__be16 ppp_proto;
> +};
> +
>  enum flow_dissector_key_id {
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL, /* struct flow_dissector_key_control */
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_BASIC, /* struct flow_dissector_key_basic */
> @@ -291,6 +301,7 @@ enum flow_dissector_key_id {
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CT, /* struct flow_dissector_key_ct */
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_HASH, /* struct flow_dissector_key_hash */
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_NUM_OF_VLANS, /* struct flow_dissector_key_num_of_vlans */
> +	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE,  /* struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe */
>  
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_MAX,
>  };
> diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> index 6aee04f75e3e..41933905f90b 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> @@ -895,6 +895,35 @@ bool bpf_flow_dissect(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_flow_dissector *ctx,
>  	return result == BPF_OK;
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_ppp_proto_supported(__be16 proto)
> +{
> +	switch (proto) {
> +	case htons(PPP_AT):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPX):
> +	case htons(PPP_VJC_COMP):
> +	case htons(PPP_VJC_UNCOMP):
> +	case htons(PPP_MP):
> +	case htons(PPP_COMPFRAG):
> +	case htons(PPP_COMP):
> +	case htons(PPP_MPLS_UC):
> +	case htons(PPP_MPLS_MC):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_ATCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPXCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPV6CP):
> +	case htons(PPP_CCPFRAG):
> +	case htons(PPP_MPLSCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_LCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_PAP):
> +	case htons(PPP_LQR):
> +	case htons(PPP_CHAP):
> +	case htons(PPP_CBCP):
> +		return true;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * __skb_flow_dissect - extract the flow_keys struct and return it
>   * @net: associated network namespace, derived from @skb if NULL
> @@ -1221,19 +1250,29 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>  		}
>  
>  		nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
> -		switch (hdr->proto) {
> -		case htons(PPP_IP):
> +		if (hdr->proto == htons(PPP_IP)) {
>  			proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>  			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
> -			break;
> -		case htons(PPP_IPV6):
> +		} else if (hdr->proto == htons(PPP_IPV6)) {
>  			proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>  			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
> -			break;
> -		default:

Oh, sorry for missing this previously. This switch -> if-else
conversion looks redundant.
You can add `if (is_ppp_proto_supported()) GOOD; else BAD` to the
`default` label without modifying the rest of code (to skip the
actual dissecting block you can add a condition there that @fdret
must not equal BAD).

> +		} else if (is_ppp_proto_supported(hdr->proto)) {
> +			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_GOOD;
> +		} else {
>  			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD;
>  			break;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> +				       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE)) {
> +			struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe *key_pppoe;
> +
> +			key_pppoe = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
> +							      FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE,
> +							      target_container);
> +			key_pppoe->session_id = ntohs(hdr->hdr.sid);
> +			key_pppoe->ppp_proto = hdr->proto;
> +		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  	case htons(ETH_P_TIPC): {
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Thanks,
Olek
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, gustavoars@kernel.org,
	baowen.zheng@corigine.com, boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com,
	elic@nvidia.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us, kurt@linutronix.de,
	pablo@netfilter.org, pabeni@redhat.com, paulb@nvidia.com,
	simon.horman@corigine.com, komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com,
	zhangkaiheb@126.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com, wojciech.drewek@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] flow_dissector: Add PPPoE dissectors
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:01:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624150126.2386014-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624134134.13605-2-marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>

From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:41:31 +0200

> From: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> 
> Allow to dissect PPPoE specific fields which are:
> - session ID (16 bits)
> - ppp protocol (16 bits)
> 
> The goal is to make the following TC command possible:
> 
>   # tc filter add dev ens6f0 ingress prio 1 protocol ppp_ses \
>       flower \
>         pppoe_sid 12 \
>         ppp_proto ip \
>       action drop
> 
> Note that only PPPoE Session is supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/net/flow_dissector.h | 11 ++++++++
>  net/core/flow_dissector.c    | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/flow_dissector.h b/include/net/flow_dissector.h
> index a4c6057c7097..8ff40c7c3f1c 100644
> --- a/include/net/flow_dissector.h
> +++ b/include/net/flow_dissector.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,16 @@ struct flow_dissector_key_num_of_vlans {
>  	u8 num_of_vlans;
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe:
> + * @session_id: pppoe session id
> + * @ppp_proto: ppp protocol
> + */
> +struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe {
> +	u16 session_id;
> +	__be16 ppp_proto;
> +};
> +
>  enum flow_dissector_key_id {
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CONTROL, /* struct flow_dissector_key_control */
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_BASIC, /* struct flow_dissector_key_basic */
> @@ -291,6 +301,7 @@ enum flow_dissector_key_id {
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_CT, /* struct flow_dissector_key_ct */
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_HASH, /* struct flow_dissector_key_hash */
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_NUM_OF_VLANS, /* struct flow_dissector_key_num_of_vlans */
> +	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE,  /* struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe */
>  
>  	FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_MAX,
>  };
> diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> index 6aee04f75e3e..41933905f90b 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> @@ -895,6 +895,35 @@ bool bpf_flow_dissect(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_flow_dissector *ctx,
>  	return result == BPF_OK;
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_ppp_proto_supported(__be16 proto)
> +{
> +	switch (proto) {
> +	case htons(PPP_AT):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPX):
> +	case htons(PPP_VJC_COMP):
> +	case htons(PPP_VJC_UNCOMP):
> +	case htons(PPP_MP):
> +	case htons(PPP_COMPFRAG):
> +	case htons(PPP_COMP):
> +	case htons(PPP_MPLS_UC):
> +	case htons(PPP_MPLS_MC):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_ATCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPXCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_IPV6CP):
> +	case htons(PPP_CCPFRAG):
> +	case htons(PPP_MPLSCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_LCP):
> +	case htons(PPP_PAP):
> +	case htons(PPP_LQR):
> +	case htons(PPP_CHAP):
> +	case htons(PPP_CBCP):
> +		return true;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * __skb_flow_dissect - extract the flow_keys struct and return it
>   * @net: associated network namespace, derived from @skb if NULL
> @@ -1221,19 +1250,29 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>  		}
>  
>  		nhoff += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
> -		switch (hdr->proto) {
> -		case htons(PPP_IP):
> +		if (hdr->proto == htons(PPP_IP)) {
>  			proto = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>  			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
> -			break;
> -		case htons(PPP_IPV6):
> +		} else if (hdr->proto == htons(PPP_IPV6)) {
>  			proto = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
>  			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_PROTO_AGAIN;
> -			break;
> -		default:

Oh, sorry for missing this previously. This switch -> if-else
conversion looks redundant.
You can add `if (is_ppp_proto_supported()) GOOD; else BAD` to the
`default` label without modifying the rest of code (to skip the
actual dissecting block you can add a condition there that @fdret
must not equal BAD).

> +		} else if (is_ppp_proto_supported(hdr->proto)) {
> +			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_GOOD;
> +		} else {
>  			fdret = FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD;
>  			break;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
> +				       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE)) {
> +			struct flow_dissector_key_pppoe *key_pppoe;
> +
> +			key_pppoe = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
> +							      FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PPPOE,
> +							      target_container);
> +			key_pppoe->session_id = ntohs(hdr->hdr.sid);
> +			key_pppoe->ppp_proto = hdr->proto;
> +		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  	case htons(ETH_P_TIPC): {
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Thanks,
Olek

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-24 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-24 13:41 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] ice: PPPoE offload support Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41 ` Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] flow_dissector: Add PPPoE dissectors Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41   ` Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 15:01   ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2022-06-24 15:01     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-27 11:33     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Drewek, Wojciech
2022-06-27 11:33       ` Drewek, Wojciech
2022-06-26  7:20   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Baowen Zheng
2022-06-26  7:20     ` Baowen Zheng
2022-06-27 11:36     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Drewek, Wojciech
2022-06-27 11:36       ` Drewek, Wojciech
2022-06-24 13:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net-next 2/4] net/sched: flower: Add PPPoE filter Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41   ` Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] flow_offload: Introduce flow_match_pppoe Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41   ` Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net-next 4/4] ice: Add support for PPPoE hardware offload Marcin Szycik
2022-06-24 13:41   ` Marcin Szycik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220624150126.2386014-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --to=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=baowen.zheng@corigine.com \
    --cc=boris.sukholitko@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=marcin.szycik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangkaiheb@126.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.