All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] pmem: fix a name collision
@ 2022-06-30 17:51 Jane Chu
  2022-06-30 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jane Chu @ 2022-06-30 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dan.j.williams, linux-kernel, hch, nvdimm

Kernel test robot detected name collision when compiled on 'um'
architecture.  Rename "to_phys()"  to "_to_phys()".

>> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c:48:20: error: conflicting types for 'to_phys'; have 'phys_addr_t(struct pmem_device *, phys_addr_t)' {aka 'long long unsigned int(struct pmem_device *, long long unsigned int)'}
      48 | static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
         |                    ^~~~~~~
   In file included from arch/um/include/asm/page.h:98,
                    from arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:15,
                    from include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
                    from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
                    from ./arch/um/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,

   arch/um/include/shared/mem.h:12:29: note: previous definition of 'to_phys' with type 'long unsigned int(void *)'
      12 | static inline unsigned long to_phys(void *virt)
         |                             ^~~~~~~

vim +48 drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
    47
  > 48	static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
    49	{
    50		return pmem->phys_addr + offset;
    51	}
    52

Fixes: 9409c9b6709e (pmem: refactor pmem_clear_poison())
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
index 629d10fcf53b..26c81ed7c0fe 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static struct nd_region *to_region(struct pmem_device *pmem)
 	return to_nd_region(to_dev(pmem)->parent);
 }
 
-static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
+static phys_addr_t _to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
 {
 	return pmem->phys_addr + offset;
 }
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static phys_addr_t to_offset(struct pmem_device *pmem, sector_t sector)
 static void pmem_mkpage_present(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset,
 		unsigned int len)
 {
-	phys_addr_t phys = to_phys(pmem, offset);
+	phys_addr_t phys = _to_phys(pmem, offset);
 	unsigned long pfn_start, pfn_end, pfn;
 
 	/* only pmem in the linear map supports HWPoison */
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void pmem_clear_bb(struct pmem_device *pmem, sector_t sector, long blks)
 static long __pmem_clear_poison(struct pmem_device *pmem,
 		phys_addr_t offset, unsigned int len)
 {
-	phys_addr_t phys = to_phys(pmem, offset);
+	phys_addr_t phys = _to_phys(pmem, offset);
 	long cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(to_dev(pmem), phys, len);
 
 	if (cleared > 0) {
-- 
2.18.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pmem: fix a name collision
  2022-06-30 17:51 [PATCH] pmem: fix a name collision Jane Chu
@ 2022-06-30 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2022-06-30 18:14   ` Jane Chu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2022-06-30 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jane Chu; +Cc: dan.j.williams, linux-kernel, hch, nvdimm

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:51:55AM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
> -static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
> +static phys_addr_t _to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)

I'd rather call this pmem_to_phys as that is a much nicer name.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pmem: fix a name collision
  2022-06-30 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2022-06-30 18:14   ` Jane Chu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jane Chu @ 2022-06-30 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nvdimm@lists.linux.dev

On 6/30/2022 11:04 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:51:55AM -0600, Jane Chu wrote:
>> -static phys_addr_t to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
>> +static phys_addr_t _to_phys(struct pmem_device *pmem, phys_addr_t offset)
> 
> I'd rather call this pmem_to_phys as that is a much nicer name.

Okay, thanks!

-jane

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-30 18:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-30 17:51 [PATCH] pmem: fix a name collision Jane Chu
2022-06-30 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-30 18:14   ` Jane Chu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.