From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:05:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704150514.48816-1-elver@google.com>
Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various
interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch
interesting corner cases via bug-injection).
The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to
hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all
architectures.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v3:
* Don't use raw_smp_processor_id().
v2:
* New patch.
---
kernel/events/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 +
3 files changed, 334 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
diff --git a/kernel/events/Makefile b/kernel/events/Makefile
index 8591c180b52b..91a62f566743 100644
--- a/kernel/events/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/events/Makefile
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST) += hw_breakpoint_test.o
obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..433c5c45e2a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting logic.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
+
+#define TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, slots) \
+ do { \
+ if ((slots) > get_test_bp_slots()) { \
+ kunit_skip((test), "Requires breakpoint slots: %d > %d", slots, \
+ get_test_bp_slots()); \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(expr) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOSPC, PTR_ERR(expr))
+
+#define MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS 512
+
+static char break_vars[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
+static struct perf_event *test_bps[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
+static struct task_struct *__other_task;
+
+static struct perf_event *register_test_bp(int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int idx)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {};
+
+ if (WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS))
+ return NULL;
+
+ hw_breakpoint_init(&attr);
+ attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)&break_vars[idx];
+ attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
+ attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW;
+ return perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, cpu, tsk, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static void unregister_test_bp(struct perf_event **bp)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(*bp)))
+ return;
+ if (WARN_ON(!*bp))
+ return;
+ unregister_hw_breakpoint(*bp);
+ *bp = NULL;
+}
+
+static int get_test_bp_slots(void)
+{
+ static int slots;
+
+ if (!slots)
+ slots = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA);
+
+ return slots;
+}
+
+static void fill_one_bp_slot(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ struct perf_event *bp = register_test_bp(cpu, tsk, *id);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bp);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(bp));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, test_bps[*id]);
+ test_bps[(*id)++] = bp;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fills up the given @cpu/@tsk with breakpoints, only leaving @skip slots free.
+ *
+ * Returns true if this can be called again, continuing at @id.
+ */
+static bool fill_bp_slots(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int skip)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < get_test_bp_slots() - skip; ++i)
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, id, cpu, tsk);
+
+ return *id + get_test_bp_slots() <= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS;
+}
+
+static int dummy_kthread(void *arg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct task_struct *get_other_task(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+ if (__other_task)
+ return __other_task;
+
+ tsk = kthread_create(dummy_kthread, NULL, "hw_breakpoint_dummy_task");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(tsk));
+ __other_task = tsk;
+ return __other_task;
+}
+
+static int get_test_cpu(int num)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ WARN_ON(num < 0);
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (num-- <= 0)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return cpu;
+}
+
+/* ===== Test cases ===== */
+
+static void test_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL, 0);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_many_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+ int cpu;
+
+ /* Test that CPUs are independent. */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ bool do_continue = fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, cpu, NULL, 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(cpu, NULL, idx));
+ if (!do_continue)
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ /* Test that tasks are independent. */
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Remove one from first task and adding back CPU-target should not work. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /*
+ * Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work; this case is
+ * special vs. above because the task's constraints are CPU-dependent.
+ */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_mixed(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
+
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 1);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+
+ /* Transition from CPU-dependent pinned count to CPU-independent. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[1]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Can still create breakpoints on some other CPU. */
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Cannot create breakpoints on some other CPU either. */
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int tsk_on_cpu_idx, cpu_idx;
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 2);
+ /* Transitioning from only all CPU breakpoints to mixed. */
+ tsk_on_cpu_idx = idx;
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+
+ /* We should still be able to use up another CPU's slots. */
+ cpu_idx = idx;
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+
+ /* Transitioning back to task target on all CPUs. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[tsk_on_cpu_idx]);
+ /* Still have a CPU target breakpoint in get_test_cpu(1). */
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ /* Remove it and try again. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[cpu_idx]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case hw_breakpoint_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_cpu),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_many_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_all_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_one_cpu),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_mixed),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu),
+ {},
+};
+
+static int test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* Most test cases want 2 distinct CPUs. */
+ return num_online_cpus() < 2 ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+
+static void test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; ++i) {
+ if (test_bps[i])
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[i]);
+ }
+
+ if (__other_task) {
+ kthread_stop(__other_task);
+ __other_task = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
+static struct kunit_suite hw_breakpoint_test_suite = {
+ .name = "hw_breakpoint",
+ .test_cases = hw_breakpoint_test_cases,
+ .init = test_init,
+ .exit = test_exit,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&hw_breakpoint_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Marco Elver <elver@google.com>");
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 2e24db4bff19..4c87a6edf046 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST
CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
+config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST
+ bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ depends on KUNIT=y
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ help
+ Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+
config TEST_UDELAY
tristate "udelay test driver"
help
--
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:05:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704150514.48816-1-elver@google.com>
Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various
interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch
interesting corner cases via bug-injection).
The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to
hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all
architectures.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v3:
* Don't use raw_smp_processor_id().
v2:
* New patch.
---
kernel/events/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 +
3 files changed, 334 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
diff --git a/kernel/events/Makefile b/kernel/events/Makefile
index 8591c180b52b..91a62f566743 100644
--- a/kernel/events/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/events/Makefile
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST) += hw_breakpoint_test.o
obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..433c5c45e2a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting logic.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
+
+#define TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, slots) \
+ do { \
+ if ((slots) > get_test_bp_slots()) { \
+ kunit_skip((test), "Requires breakpoint slots: %d > %d", slots, \
+ get_test_bp_slots()); \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(expr) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOSPC, PTR_ERR(expr))
+
+#define MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS 512
+
+static char break_vars[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
+static struct perf_event *test_bps[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
+static struct task_struct *__other_task;
+
+static struct perf_event *register_test_bp(int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int idx)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {};
+
+ if (WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS))
+ return NULL;
+
+ hw_breakpoint_init(&attr);
+ attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)&break_vars[idx];
+ attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
+ attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW;
+ return perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, cpu, tsk, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static void unregister_test_bp(struct perf_event **bp)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(*bp)))
+ return;
+ if (WARN_ON(!*bp))
+ return;
+ unregister_hw_breakpoint(*bp);
+ *bp = NULL;
+}
+
+static int get_test_bp_slots(void)
+{
+ static int slots;
+
+ if (!slots)
+ slots = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA);
+
+ return slots;
+}
+
+static void fill_one_bp_slot(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ struct perf_event *bp = register_test_bp(cpu, tsk, *id);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bp);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(bp));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, test_bps[*id]);
+ test_bps[(*id)++] = bp;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fills up the given @cpu/@tsk with breakpoints, only leaving @skip slots free.
+ *
+ * Returns true if this can be called again, continuing at @id.
+ */
+static bool fill_bp_slots(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int skip)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < get_test_bp_slots() - skip; ++i)
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, id, cpu, tsk);
+
+ return *id + get_test_bp_slots() <= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS;
+}
+
+static int dummy_kthread(void *arg)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct task_struct *get_other_task(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+ if (__other_task)
+ return __other_task;
+
+ tsk = kthread_create(dummy_kthread, NULL, "hw_breakpoint_dummy_task");
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(tsk));
+ __other_task = tsk;
+ return __other_task;
+}
+
+static int get_test_cpu(int num)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ WARN_ON(num < 0);
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (num-- <= 0)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return cpu;
+}
+
+/* ===== Test cases ===== */
+
+static void test_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL, 0);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_many_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+ int cpu;
+
+ /* Test that CPUs are independent. */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ bool do_continue = fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, cpu, NULL, 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(cpu, NULL, idx));
+ if (!do_continue)
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ /* Test that tasks are independent. */
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Remove one from first task and adding back CPU-target should not work. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /*
+ * Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work; this case is
+ * special vs. above because the task's constraints are CPU-dependent.
+ */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_mixed(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
+
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 1);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+
+ /* Transition from CPU-dependent pinned count to CPU-independent. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[1]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Can still create breakpoints on some other CPU. */
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ /* Cannot create breakpoints on some other CPU either. */
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int tsk_on_cpu_idx, cpu_idx;
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
+
+ fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 2);
+ /* Transitioning from only all CPU breakpoints to mixed. */
+ tsk_on_cpu_idx = idx;
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+
+ /* We should still be able to use up another CPU's slots. */
+ cpu_idx = idx;
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL);
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+
+ /* Transitioning back to task target on all CPUs. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[tsk_on_cpu_idx]);
+ /* Still have a CPU target breakpoint in get_test_cpu(1). */
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ /* Remove it and try again. */
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[cpu_idx]);
+ fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
+
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+ TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case hw_breakpoint_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_cpu),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_many_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_all_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_one_cpu),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_mixed),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu),
+ {},
+};
+
+static int test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* Most test cases want 2 distinct CPUs. */
+ return num_online_cpus() < 2 ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+
+static void test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; ++i) {
+ if (test_bps[i])
+ unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[i]);
+ }
+
+ if (__other_task) {
+ kthread_stop(__other_task);
+ __other_task = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
+static struct kunit_suite hw_breakpoint_test_suite = {
+ .name = "hw_breakpoint",
+ .test_cases = hw_breakpoint_test_cases,
+ .init = test_init,
+ .exit = test_exit,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&hw_breakpoint_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Marco Elver <elver@google.com>");
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 2e24db4bff19..4c87a6edf046 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST
CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
+config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST
+ bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+ depends on KUNIT=y
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ help
+ Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+
config TEST_UDELAY
tristate "udelay test driver"
help
--
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 15:05 [PATCH v3 00/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-04 15:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-20 15:22 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:22 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21 16:22 ` Mark Rutland
2022-07-21 16:22 ` Mark Rutland
2022-07-22 9:10 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 9:10 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 9:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 9:20 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 10:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 10:31 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 11:03 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 11:03 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 13:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 13:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-25 11:00 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-25 11:00 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Provide hw_breakpoint_is_used() and use in test Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-04 15:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-20 15:22 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:22 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Clean up headers Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:23 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:23 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize list of per-task breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:29 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:29 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:39 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:39 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Mark data __ro_after_init Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:30 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:30 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize constant number of breakpoint slots Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:31 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:31 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Make hw_breakpoint_weight() inlinable Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:32 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:32 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Remove useless code related to flexible breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:34 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:34 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: Avoid relying on caller synchronization Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add percpu_is_write_locked() and percpu_is_read_locked() Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:36 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:36 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-17 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 6:00 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-29 6:00 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Reduce contention with large number of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:38 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:38 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-17 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:14 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-17 13:14 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-29 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 9:38 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-29 9:38 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Introduce bp_slots_histogram Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:40 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:40 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:42 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:42 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize toggle_bp_slot() " Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:44 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:44 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-12 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-12 13:39 ` Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:47 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:47 ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-16 14:12 ` Marco Elver
2022-08-16 14:12 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.