From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com,
ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [btrfs] 638ab1768a: aim7.jobs-per-min 6.2% improvement
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 16:40:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707144015.GD15169@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsGZXV7qW6bedSlc@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:27:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a 6.2% improvement of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 638ab1768a6abb9b1280783e93a3de9a95f23af8 ("btrfs: remove redundant check in up check_setget_bounds")
> https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git dev/send-v2-my-wip
Though it's on some development branch, the patch has been added to
misc-next as well and the perf improvement is on par with the estimate
5% for metadata heavy workloads. Thanks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [btrfs] 638ab1768a: aim7.jobs-per-min 6.2% improvement
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:40:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220707144015.GD15169@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsGZXV7qW6bedSlc@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 533 bytes --]
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 09:27:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a 6.2% improvement of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 638ab1768a6abb9b1280783e93a3de9a95f23af8 ("btrfs: remove redundant check in up check_setget_bounds")
> https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git dev/send-v2-my-wip
Though it's on some development branch, the patch has been added to
misc-next as well and the perf improvement is on par with the estimate
5% for metadata heavy workloads. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-03 13:27 [btrfs] 638ab1768a: aim7.jobs-per-min 6.2% improvement kernel test robot
2022-07-03 13:27 ` kernel test robot
2022-07-07 14:40 ` David Sterba [this message]
2022-07-07 14:40 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220707144015.GD15169@suse.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.