From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 03:25:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727032334-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR12MB54001D7DFB29EF048CCD04CCAB979@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 06:51:56AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote:
> I found out that the reason why I could not enforce the mtu stems from the fact that I did not configure max mtu for the net device (e.g. through libvirt <mtu size="9000"/>).
> Libvirt does not allow this configuration for vdpa devices and probably for a reason. The vdpa backend driver has the freedom to do it using its copy of virtio_net_config.
>
> The code in qemu that is responsible to allow to consider the device MTU restriction is here:
>
> static void virtio_net_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(dev);
> NetClientState *nc;
> int i;
>
> if (n->net_conf.mtu) {
> n->host_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU);
> }
>
> The above code can be interpreted as follows:
> if the command line arguments of qemu indicates that mtu should be limited, then we would read this mtu limitation from the device (that actual value is ignored).
>
> I worked around this limitation by unconditionally setting VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU in the host features. As said, it only indicates that we should read the actual limitation for the device.
>
> If this makes sense I can send a patch to fix this.
Well it will then either have to be for vdpa only, or have
compat machinery to avoid breaking migration.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 03:25:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727032334-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR12MB54001D7DFB29EF048CCD04CCAB979@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 06:51:56AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote:
> I found out that the reason why I could not enforce the mtu stems from the fact that I did not configure max mtu for the net device (e.g. through libvirt <mtu size="9000"/>).
> Libvirt does not allow this configuration for vdpa devices and probably for a reason. The vdpa backend driver has the freedom to do it using its copy of virtio_net_config.
>
> The code in qemu that is responsible to allow to consider the device MTU restriction is here:
>
> static void virtio_net_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(dev);
> NetClientState *nc;
> int i;
>
> if (n->net_conf.mtu) {
> n->host_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU);
> }
>
> The above code can be interpreted as follows:
> if the command line arguments of qemu indicates that mtu should be limited, then we would read this mtu limitation from the device (that actual value is ignored).
>
> I worked around this limitation by unconditionally setting VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU in the host features. As said, it only indicates that we should read the actual limitation for the device.
>
> If this makes sense I can send a patch to fix this.
Well it will then either have to be for vdpa only, or have
compat machinery to avoid breaking migration.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-27 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <DM8PR12MB5400869D5921E28CE2DC7263AB8F9@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2022-07-19 13:40 ` VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <DM8PR12MB5400F967A710B1151AD5132CAB8F9@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <DM8PR12MB5400AB08EE51E6BF05EEBDE2AB8F9@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWc0M4O8Rr2jR4L_myPd_VmxkYjHTnwdxQFAf3N_hZw_3g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DM8PR12MB540033DA1293BA23E29148EAAB8E9@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWfOS9nCBNeborhTdOXAnmZX9XwRF=2E0aphuHbqr352CA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <DM8PR12MB54005AB1DE4617493645D2CBAB8E9@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
2022-07-20 10:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <CAJaqyWczrvaaookrQE5=6mTABS-VmJKF6iY+aO3ZD8OB4FumRA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-07-27 6:51 ` Eli Cohen
2022-07-27 7:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-07-27 7:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 9:04 ` Eli Cohen
2022-07-27 9:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 9:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 10:16 ` Eli Cohen
2022-07-27 15:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 15:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 5:51 ` Eli Cohen
2022-07-28 6:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 6:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 2:09 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 2:09 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 5:39 ` Eli Cohen
2022-07-28 5:51 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 5:51 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 6:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 6:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 6:57 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 6:57 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-01 10:02 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220727032334-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.