From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>, Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>,
"Hemminger, Stephen" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Virtio-Dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
kubakici@wp.pl, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, loseweigh@gmail.com,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
gavi@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 05:22:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220809051849-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsVG_62yJ5nGmp5ufF_xiEJk2TezQz-QFftF8ezKYLB8A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:44:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > @@ -3571,8 +3581,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device
> > *vdev)
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) ||
> > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) ||
> > - virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
> > + virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) {
> > vi->big_packets = true;
> > + vi->gso_is_supported = true;
> >
> > Please do the same for virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(), and
> > correspondingly virtnet_restore_guest_offloads() as well. Not sure why
> > virtnet_clear_guest_offloads() or the caller doesn't unset big_packet on
> > successful return, seems like a bug to me.
>
> It is fine as long as
>
> 1) we don't implement ethtool API for changing guest offloads
> 2) big mode XDP is not enabled
>
> So that code works only for XDP but we forbid big packets in the case
> of XDP right now.
>
> Thanks
To put it another way, changing big_packets after probe requires a bunch
of work as current code assumes this flag never changes.
Adding a TODO to handle dynamic offload config is fine but
I don't think it should block this.
--
MST
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com,
Virtio-Dev <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
kubakici@wp.pl, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, gavi@nvidia.com,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Hemminger, Stephen" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
loseweigh@gmail.com, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
Gavin Li <gavinl@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 05:22:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220809051849-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsVG_62yJ5nGmp5ufF_xiEJk2TezQz-QFftF8ezKYLB8A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:44:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > @@ -3571,8 +3581,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device
> > *vdev)
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) ||
> > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) ||
> > - virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
> > + virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) {
> > vi->big_packets = true;
> > + vi->gso_is_supported = true;
> >
> > Please do the same for virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(), and
> > correspondingly virtnet_restore_guest_offloads() as well. Not sure why
> > virtnet_clear_guest_offloads() or the caller doesn't unset big_packet on
> > successful return, seems like a bug to me.
>
> It is fine as long as
>
> 1) we don't implement ethtool API for changing guest offloads
> 2) big mode XDP is not enabled
>
> So that code works only for XDP but we forbid big packets in the case
> of XDP right now.
>
> Thanks
To put it another way, changing big_packets after probe requires a bunch
of work as current code assumes this flag never changes.
Adding a TODO to handle dynamic offload config is fine but
I don't think it should block this.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 4:45 [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets Gavin Li
2022-08-04 5:00 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-04 5:00 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-04 7:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-04 7:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-04 7:23 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-04 7:23 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-04 7:24 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-04 7:24 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-08 6:54 ` Gavin Li
2022-08-08 6:24 ` Gavin Li
2022-08-05 22:11 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-05 22:11 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-05 23:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-05 23:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-08 7:34 ` Gavin Li
2022-08-08 7:31 ` Gavin Li
2022-08-08 23:56 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-08 23:56 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 7:06 ` Gavin Li
2022-08-09 7:44 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 7:44 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 9:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-08-09 9:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 9:28 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 9:28 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 9:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 18:38 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 18:38 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 18:42 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-09 18:42 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-09 19:08 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 19:08 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 19:18 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-09 19:18 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-09 20:32 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 20:32 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 21:13 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-09 21:13 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-09 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 21:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 21:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 21:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 21:49 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-09 21:49 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-09 22:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 22:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 22:49 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-09 22:49 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-09 22:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 22:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 23:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 23:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 23:24 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 23:24 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-10 6:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 6:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 6:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 6:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 6:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-10 6:59 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-10 9:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 9:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 16:00 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-10 16:00 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-10 16:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 16:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 16:22 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-10 16:22 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-10 16:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 16:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 17:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 17:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 17:06 ` Parav Pandit
2022-08-10 17:06 ` Parav Pandit via Virtualization
2022-08-10 17:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 17:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-11 0:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-11 0:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 22:32 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 22:32 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 22:54 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 22:54 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 23:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 23:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 1:24 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-10 1:24 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 21:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 21:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 21:39 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 21:39 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 22:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-09 22:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-10 1:15 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-10 1:15 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-09 18:06 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-09 18:06 ` Si-Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220809051849-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gavi@nvidia.com \
--cc=gavinl@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
--cc=loseweigh@gmail.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.