Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Revert "virtio_net: set the default max ring size by find_vqs()"

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	c@redhat.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Revert "virtio_net: set the default max ring size by find_vqs()"
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:39:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220815173256-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220815212839.aop6wwx4fkngihbf@awork3.anarazel.de>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:28:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2022-08-15 17:04:10 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > So virtio has a queue_size register. When read, it will give you
> > originally the maximum queue size. Normally we just read it and
> > use it as queue size.
> > 
> > However, when queue memory allocation fails, and unconditionally with a
> > network device with the problematic patch, driver is asking the
> > hypervisor to make the ring smaller by writing a smaller value into this
> > register.
> > 
> > I suspect that what happens is hypervisor still uses the original value
> > somewhere.
> 
> It looks more like the host is never told about the changed size for legacy
> devices...
> 
> Indeed, adding a vp_legacy_set_queue_size() & call to it to setup_vq(), makes
> 5.19 + restricting queue sizes to 1024 boot again.

Interesting, the register is RO in the legacy interface.
And to be frank I can't find where is vp_legacy_set_queue_size
even implemented. It's midnight here too ...

>  I'd bet that it also would
> fix 6.0rc1, but I'm running out of time to test that.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Andres Freund

Yes I figured this out too. And I was able to reproduce on qemu now.

Andres thanks a lot for the help!

I'm posting a new patchset reverting all the handing of resize
restrictions, I think we should rethink it for the next release.

Thanks everyone for the help!

-- 
MST

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization