From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: abelvesa@kernel.org, abel.vesa@linaro.org,
mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clk: imx: support protected-clocks
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:02:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816150201.GS2387@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816130327.2987710-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:03:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> For the clocks listed in protected-clocks, enable them to avoid
> Linux disable them. This will benifit root Linux and inmate cell run
> on top of Jailhouse hypervisor, and benifit the other case(
> A53 Linux run together with M7 RTOS).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V2:
> Per Sascha, use common protected-clocks property.
See my mail to v1. I did not request that you should use the
protected-clocks property:
> There were cases when a property first started with a "soc," prefix and
> later when people realized that it could be useful for other
> drivers/SoCs as well, the prefix was removed. With that in mind I
> would expect that a "fsl,protected-clocks" property behaves the same
> as a "protected-clocks" property without the prefix.
>
> If it doesn't please pick a different name. I didn't want to suggest
> to just drop the "fsl," prefix and to use the generic property name
> when the properties have a different meaning.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: abelvesa@kernel.org, abel.vesa@linaro.org,
mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clk: imx: support protected-clocks
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:02:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816150201.GS2387@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816130327.2987710-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:03:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> For the clocks listed in protected-clocks, enable them to avoid
> Linux disable them. This will benifit root Linux and inmate cell run
> on top of Jailhouse hypervisor, and benifit the other case(
> A53 Linux run together with M7 RTOS).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V2:
> Per Sascha, use common protected-clocks property.
See my mail to v1. I did not request that you should use the
protected-clocks property:
> There were cases when a property first started with a "soc," prefix and
> later when people realized that it could be useful for other
> drivers/SoCs as well, the prefix was removed. With that in mind I
> would expect that a "fsl,protected-clocks" property behaves the same
> as a "protected-clocks" property without the prefix.
>
> If it doesn't please pick a different name. I didn't want to suggest
> to just drop the "fsl," prefix and to use the generic property name
> when the properties have a different meaning.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 13:03 [PATCH V2] clk: imx: support protected-clocks Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-08-16 13:03 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2022-08-16 15:02 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2022-08-16 15:02 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-08-23 1:05 ` Peng Fan
2022-08-23 1:05 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220816150201.GS2387@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=abelvesa@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.