From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: fix argument 2 of rproc_mem_entry_init
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:06:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220823200644.GC1781852@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1660567398-24495-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:43:18PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> There are sparse warning:
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:602:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *va @@ got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr @@
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:602:49: sparse: expected void *va
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:602:49: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:638:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *va @@ got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr @@
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:638:49: sparse: expected void *va
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:638:49: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr
>
> Fixes: ec0e5549f358 ("remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add remoteproc driver for DSP on i.MX")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index ca0817f8e41e..899aa8dd12f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
> }
>
> /* Register memory region */
> - mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)att->sa,
> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, (void __force *)cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)att->sa,
> att->size, da, NULL, NULL, "dsp_mem");
>
> if (mem)
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
> }
>
> /* Register memory region */
> - mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, (void __force *)cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> rmem->size, da, NULL, NULL, it.node->name);
Applied.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> if (mem)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: fix argument 2 of rproc_mem_entry_init
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:06:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220823200644.GC1781852@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1660567398-24495-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:43:18PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> There are sparse warning:
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:602:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *va @@ got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr @@
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:602:49: sparse: expected void *va
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:602:49: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:638:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@ expected void *va @@ got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr @@
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:638:49: sparse: expected void *va
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c:638:49: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem *[assigned] cpu_addr
>
> Fixes: ec0e5549f358 ("remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add remoteproc driver for DSP on i.MX")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index ca0817f8e41e..899aa8dd12f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
> }
>
> /* Register memory region */
> - mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)att->sa,
> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, (void __force *)cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)att->sa,
> att->size, da, NULL, NULL, "dsp_mem");
>
> if (mem)
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_add_carveout(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
> }
>
> /* Register memory region */
> - mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, (void __force *)cpu_addr, (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> rmem->size, da, NULL, NULL, it.node->name);
Applied.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> if (mem)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-23 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 12:43 [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: fix argument 2 of rproc_mem_entry_init Shengjiu Wang
2022-08-15 12:43 ` Shengjiu Wang
2022-08-15 14:53 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-08-15 14:53 ` Mukesh Ojha
2022-08-23 20:06 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-08-23 20:06 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220823200644.GC1781852@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.