From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
ravi.bangoria@amd.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/9] perf/x86/intel: Remove x86_pmu::update_topdown_event
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:10:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829101321.771635301@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20220829100959.917169441@infradead.org
Now that it is all internal to the intel driver, remove
x86_pmu::update_topdown_event.
Assumes that is_topdown_count(event) can only be true when the
hardware has topdown stuff and the function is set.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2672,6 +2672,7 @@ static u64 adl_update_topdown_event(stru
return icl_update_topdown_event(event);
}
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event, x86_perf_event_update);
static void intel_pmu_read_topdown_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
@@ -2683,7 +2684,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_read_topdown_event
return;
perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu);
- x86_pmu.update_topdown_event(event);
+ static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(event);
perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
}
@@ -2691,7 +2692,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct
{
if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
intel_pmu_auto_reload_read(event);
- else if (is_topdown_count(event) && x86_pmu.update_topdown_event)
+ else if (is_topdown_count(event))
intel_pmu_read_topdown_event(event);
else
x86_perf_event_update(event);
@@ -2820,9 +2821,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_period(struct p
static u64 intel_pmu_update(struct perf_event *event)
{
- if (unlikely(is_topdown_count(event)) &&
- x86_pmu.update_topdown_event)
- return x86_pmu.update_topdown_event(event);
+ if (unlikely(is_topdown_count(event)))
+ return static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(event);
return x86_perf_event_update(event);
}
@@ -2950,8 +2950,7 @@ static int handle_pmi_common(struct pt_r
*/
if (__test_and_clear_bit(GLOBAL_STATUS_PERF_METRICS_OVF_BIT, (unsigned long *)&status)) {
handled++;
- if (x86_pmu.update_topdown_event)
- x86_pmu.update_topdown_event(NULL);
+ static_call(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event)(NULL);
}
/*
@@ -6191,7 +6190,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist = true;
intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_skl(pmem);
x86_pmu.num_topdown_events = 4;
- x86_pmu.update_topdown_event = icl_update_topdown_event;
+ static_call_update(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event,
+ &icl_update_topdown_event);
static_call_update(intel_pmu_set_topdown_event_period,
&icl_set_topdown_event_period);
pr_cont("Icelake events, ");
@@ -6229,7 +6229,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist = true;
intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_skl(pmem);
x86_pmu.num_topdown_events = 8;
- x86_pmu.update_topdown_event = icl_update_topdown_event;
+ static_call_update(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event,
+ &icl_update_topdown_event);
static_call_update(intel_pmu_set_topdown_event_period,
&icl_set_topdown_event_period);
pr_cont("Sapphire Rapids events, ");
@@ -6266,7 +6267,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
intel_pmu_pebs_data_source_adl();
x86_pmu.pebs_latency_data = adl_latency_data_small;
x86_pmu.num_topdown_events = 8;
- x86_pmu.update_topdown_event = adl_update_topdown_event;
+ static_call_update(intel_pmu_update_topdown_event,
+ &adl_update_topdown_event);
static_call_update(intel_pmu_set_topdown_event_period,
&adl_set_topdown_event_period);
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -889,7 +889,6 @@ struct x86_pmu {
* Intel perf metrics
*/
int num_topdown_events;
- u64 (*update_topdown_event)(struct perf_event *event);
/*
* perf task context (i.e. struct perf_event_context::task_ctx_data)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 10:09 [PATCH v2 0/9] perf/x86: Some cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] perf/x86: Add two more x86_pmu methods Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] perf/x86/intel: Move the topdown stuff into the intel driver Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-31 13:41 ` Liang, Kan
2022-09-01 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] perf/x86: Change x86_pmu::limit_period signature Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] perf/x86: Add a x86_pmu::limit_period static_call Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] perf/x86/intel: Remove x86_pmu::set_topdown_event_period Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel: Remove x86_pmu::update_topdown_event tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] perf/x86/p4: Remove perfctr_second_write quirk Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 8:52 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] perf/x86/intel: Shadow MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-31 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2022-09-01 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-01 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-01 11:37 ` Liang, Kan
2022-08-29 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] perf/x86/intel: Optimize short PEBS counters Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 15:55 ` Liang, Kan
2022-08-29 21:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220829101321.771635301@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.