All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: hezhongkun
	<hezhongkun.hzk-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org,
	hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org
Cc: kbuild-all-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Zhongkun He
	<hezhongkun.hzk-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type.
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:00:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202209021748.qgRnQldF-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902063303.1057-1-hezhongkun.hzk-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>

Hi hezhongkun,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.0-rc3 next-20220901]
[cannot apply to tj-cgroup/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/hezhongkun/cgroup-cpuset-Add-a-new-isolated-mems-policy-type/20220902-143512
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 53aa930dc4bae6aa269951bd37103083145d6691
config: mips-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220902/202209021748.qgRnQldF-lkp-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7b7fbf5ae59ebc703a8d545fabd305563c0f42f6
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review hezhongkun/cgroup-cpuset-Add-a-new-isolated-mems-policy-type/20220902-143512
        git checkout 7b7fbf5ae59ebc703a8d545fabd305563c0f42f6
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=mips SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/sched.h:22,
                    from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
                    from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
                    from include/linux/device.h:15,
                    from include/linux/node.h:18,
                    from include/linux/cpu.h:17,
                    from kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:25:
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'update_nodemasks_hier':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1867:54: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'w'
    1867 |                                         cp->mempolicy->w.user_nodemask);
         |                                                      ^~
   include/linux/nodemask.h:163:56: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_and'
     163 |                         __nodes_and(&(dst), &(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES)
         |                                                        ^~~~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_change_task_cs_mpol':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2477:12: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'il_prev'
    2477 |         tsk->il_prev = 0;
         |            ^~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_mpol_write':
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2525:63: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'w'
    2525 |                 nodes_and(cs_allowed, cs->effective_mems, mpol->w.user_nodemask);
         |                                                               ^~
   include/linux/nodemask.h:163:56: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_and'
     163 |                         __nodes_and(&(dst), &(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES)
         |                                                        ^~~~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_mpol_show':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2558:26: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'mode'
    2558 |         if (!mpol || mpol->mode == MPOL_DEFAULT)
         |                          ^~
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2561:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpol_to_str' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2561 |         mpol_to_str(buffer, sizeof(buffer), mpol);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_css_alloc':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2981:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpol_dup'; did you mean 'mpol_put'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2981 |         new = mpol_dup(pcs->mempolicy);
         |               ^~~~~~~~
         |               mpol_put
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2981:13: warning: assignment to 'struct mempolicy *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
    2981 |         new = mpol_dup(pcs->mempolicy);
         |             ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +1867 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c

  1821	
  1822	/*
  1823	 * update_nodemasks_hier - Update effective nodemasks and tasks in the subtree
  1824	 * @cs: the cpuset to consider
  1825	 * @new_mems: a temp variable for calculating new effective_mems
  1826	 *
  1827	 * When configured nodemask is changed, the effective nodemasks of this cpuset
  1828	 * and all its descendants need to be updated.
  1829	 *
  1830	 * On legacy hierarchy, effective_mems will be the same with mems_allowed.
  1831	 *
  1832	 * Called with cpuset_rwsem held
  1833	 */
  1834	static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
  1835	{
  1836		struct cpuset *cp;
  1837		struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
  1838		nodemask_t cs_allowed;
  1839	
  1840		rcu_read_lock();
  1841		cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
  1842			struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
  1843	
  1844			nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
  1845	
  1846			/*
  1847			 * If it becomes empty, inherit the effective mask of the
  1848			 * parent, which is guaranteed to have some MEMs.
  1849			 */
  1850			if (is_in_v2_mode() && nodes_empty(*new_mems))
  1851				*new_mems = parent->effective_mems;
  1852	
  1853			/* Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask remains the same. */
  1854			if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems)) {
  1855				pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
  1856				continue;
  1857			}
  1858	
  1859			if (!css_tryget_online(&cp->css))
  1860				continue;
  1861			rcu_read_unlock();
  1862	
  1863			spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
  1864	
  1865			if (cp->mempolicy)
  1866				nodes_and(cs_allowed, *new_mems,
> 1867						cp->mempolicy->w.user_nodemask);
  1868			mpol_rebind_policy(cp->mempolicy, &cs_allowed);
  1869			cp->effective_mems = *new_mems;
  1870			spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
  1871	
  1872			WARN_ON(!is_in_v2_mode() &&
  1873				!nodes_equal(cp->mems_allowed, cp->effective_mems));
  1874	
  1875			update_tasks_nodemask(cp);
  1876	
  1877			rcu_read_lock();
  1878			css_put(&cp->css);
  1879		}
  1880		rcu_read_unlock();
  1881	}
  1882	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: hezhongkun <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type.
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 18:00:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202209021748.qgRnQldF-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902063303.1057-1-hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>

Hi hezhongkun,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.0-rc3 next-20220901]
[cannot apply to tj-cgroup/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/hezhongkun/cgroup-cpuset-Add-a-new-isolated-mems-policy-type/20220902-143512
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 53aa930dc4bae6aa269951bd37103083145d6691
config: mips-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220902/202209021748.qgRnQldF-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7b7fbf5ae59ebc703a8d545fabd305563c0f42f6
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review hezhongkun/cgroup-cpuset-Add-a-new-isolated-mems-policy-type/20220902-143512
        git checkout 7b7fbf5ae59ebc703a8d545fabd305563c0f42f6
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=mips SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/sched.h:22,
                    from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
                    from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
                    from include/linux/device.h:15,
                    from include/linux/node.h:18,
                    from include/linux/cpu.h:17,
                    from kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:25:
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'update_nodemasks_hier':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1867:54: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'w'
    1867 |                                         cp->mempolicy->w.user_nodemask);
         |                                                      ^~
   include/linux/nodemask.h:163:56: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_and'
     163 |                         __nodes_and(&(dst), &(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES)
         |                                                        ^~~~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_change_task_cs_mpol':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2477:12: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'il_prev'
    2477 |         tsk->il_prev = 0;
         |            ^~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_mpol_write':
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2525:63: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'w'
    2525 |                 nodes_and(cs_allowed, cs->effective_mems, mpol->w.user_nodemask);
         |                                                               ^~
   include/linux/nodemask.h:163:56: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_and'
     163 |                         __nodes_and(&(dst), &(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES)
         |                                                        ^~~~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_mpol_show':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2558:26: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'mode'
    2558 |         if (!mpol || mpol->mode == MPOL_DEFAULT)
         |                          ^~
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2561:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpol_to_str' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2561 |         mpol_to_str(buffer, sizeof(buffer), mpol);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_css_alloc':
>> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2981:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpol_dup'; did you mean 'mpol_put'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2981 |         new = mpol_dup(pcs->mempolicy);
         |               ^~~~~~~~
         |               mpol_put
   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2981:13: warning: assignment to 'struct mempolicy *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
    2981 |         new = mpol_dup(pcs->mempolicy);
         |             ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +1867 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c

  1821	
  1822	/*
  1823	 * update_nodemasks_hier - Update effective nodemasks and tasks in the subtree
  1824	 * @cs: the cpuset to consider
  1825	 * @new_mems: a temp variable for calculating new effective_mems
  1826	 *
  1827	 * When configured nodemask is changed, the effective nodemasks of this cpuset
  1828	 * and all its descendants need to be updated.
  1829	 *
  1830	 * On legacy hierarchy, effective_mems will be the same with mems_allowed.
  1831	 *
  1832	 * Called with cpuset_rwsem held
  1833	 */
  1834	static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
  1835	{
  1836		struct cpuset *cp;
  1837		struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
  1838		nodemask_t cs_allowed;
  1839	
  1840		rcu_read_lock();
  1841		cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
  1842			struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
  1843	
  1844			nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
  1845	
  1846			/*
  1847			 * If it becomes empty, inherit the effective mask of the
  1848			 * parent, which is guaranteed to have some MEMs.
  1849			 */
  1850			if (is_in_v2_mode() && nodes_empty(*new_mems))
  1851				*new_mems = parent->effective_mems;
  1852	
  1853			/* Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask remains the same. */
  1854			if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems)) {
  1855				pos_css = css_rightmost_descendant(pos_css);
  1856				continue;
  1857			}
  1858	
  1859			if (!css_tryget_online(&cp->css))
  1860				continue;
  1861			rcu_read_unlock();
  1862	
  1863			spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
  1864	
  1865			if (cp->mempolicy)
  1866				nodes_and(cs_allowed, *new_mems,
> 1867						cp->mempolicy->w.user_nodemask);
  1868			mpol_rebind_policy(cp->mempolicy, &cs_allowed);
  1869			cp->effective_mems = *new_mems;
  1870			spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
  1871	
  1872			WARN_ON(!is_in_v2_mode() &&
  1873				!nodes_equal(cp->mems_allowed, cp->effective_mems));
  1874	
  1875			update_tasks_nodemask(cp);
  1876	
  1877			rcu_read_lock();
  1878			css_put(&cp->css);
  1879		}
  1880		rcu_read_unlock();
  1881	}
  1882	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-02  6:33 [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated mems.policy type hezhongkun
2022-09-02  6:33 ` hezhongkun
2022-09-02  9:14 ` kernel test robot
     [not found] ` <20220902063303.1057-1-hezhongkun.hzk-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-02 10:00   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-09-02 10:00     ` kernel test robot
2022-09-04 19:42   ` Tejun Heo
2022-09-04 19:42     ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]     ` <YxT/liaotbiOod51-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-05 10:30       ` [Phishing Risk] [External] " Zhongkun He
2022-09-05 10:30         ` Zhongkun He
     [not found]         ` <c05bdeac-b354-0ac7-3233-27f8e5cbb38a-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-06 17:19           ` Tejun Heo
2022-09-06 17:19             ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]             ` <YxeBGeOaQxvlPLzo-NiLfg/pYEd1N0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-07 12:06               ` [Phishing Risk] " Zhongkun He
2022-09-07 12:06                 ` Zhongkun He
     [not found]                 ` <d323bd95-476b-0901-855e-14c8796d1b23-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-07 15:26                   ` Tejun Heo
2022-09-07 15:26                     ` Tejun Heo
2022-09-09  3:00                     ` [Phishing Risk] " Zhongkun He
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-04  4:02 hezhongkun
2022-09-04  4:02 ` hezhongkun
2022-09-04  6:04 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-04  6:20 ` kernel test robot
     [not found] ` <20220904040241.1708-1-hezhongkun.hzk-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2022-09-04  6:41   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-04  6:41     ` kernel test robot
2022-09-05  6:45   ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-05  6:45     ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-04 23:08 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202209021748.qgRnQldF-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hezhongkun.hzk-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.