[to-be-updated] revert-frontswap-simplify-frontswap_register_ops.patch removed from -mm tree

[to-be-updated] revert-frontswap-simplify-frontswap_register_ops.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: Revert "frontswap: simplify frontswap_register_ops"
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     revert-frontswap-simplify-frontswap_register_ops.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Subject: Revert "frontswap: simplify frontswap_register_ops"
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:22:59 +0800

This reverts commit f328c1d16e4c764992895ac9c9425cea861b2ca0.

Since we plan to delay zswap initializaton, we need to invoke ops->init
for swap devices which are already online when registering backend.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829132302.3367054-4-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/frontswap.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/frontswap.c~revert-frontswap-simplify-frontswap_register_ops
+++ a/mm/frontswap.c
@@ -99,6 +99,25 @@ static inline void inc_frontswap_invalid
  */
 void frontswap_register_ops(struct frontswap_ops *ops)
 {
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(a, MAX_SWAPFILES);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(b, MAX_SWAPFILES);
+	struct swap_info_struct *si;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	bitmap_zero(a, MAX_SWAPFILES);
+	bitmap_zero(b, MAX_SWAPFILES);
+
+	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+	plist_for_each_entry(si, &swap_active_head, list) {
+		if (!WARN_ON(!si->frontswap_map))
+			__set_bit(si->type, a);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+
+	/* the new ops needs to know the currently active swap devices */
+	for_each_set_bit(i, a, MAX_SWAPFILES)
+		ops->init(i);
+
 	/*
 	 * Setting frontswap_ops must happen after the ops->init() calls
 	 * above; cmpxchg implies smp_mb() which will ensure the init is
@@ -109,6 +128,28 @@ void frontswap_register_ops(struct front
 	} while (cmpxchg(&frontswap_ops, ops->next, ops) != ops->next);
 
 	static_branch_inc(&frontswap_enabled_key);
+
+	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
+	plist_for_each_entry(si, &swap_active_head, list) {
+		if (si->frontswap_map)
+			__set_bit(si->type, b);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * On the very unlikely chance that a swap device was added or
+	 * removed between setting the "a" list bits and the ops init
+	 * calls, we re-check and do init or invalidate for any changed
+	 * bits.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(!bitmap_equal(a, b, MAX_SWAPFILES))) {
+		for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++) {
+			if (!test_bit(i, a) && test_bit(i, b))
+				ops->init(i);
+			else if (test_bit(i, a) && !test_bit(i, b))
+				ops->invalidate_area(i);
+		}
+	}
 }
 
 /*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from liushixin2@huawei.com are

mm-zswap-replace-zswap_init_started-failed-with-zswap_init_state.patch
mm-zswap-delay-the-initializaton-of-zswap-until-the-first-enablement.patch
mm-zswap-skip-confusing-print-info.patch
mm-thp-simplify-has_transparent_hugepage-by-using-is_builtin.patch
mm-thp-remove-redundant-config_transparent_hugepage.patch
mm-kmemleak-make-create_object-return-void.patch
mm-huge_memory-prevent-thp_zero_page_alloc-increased-twice.patch
mm-memcontrol-use-kstrtobool-for-swapaccount-param-parsing.patch