From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: tejas.upadhyay@intel.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 2/4] drm/i915: Add missing mask when reading GEN12_DSMBASE
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:04:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202209160835.MMBeObmU-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915-stolen-v1-2-117c5f295bb2@intel.com>
Hi Lucas,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on bb4f6b2281b11b009210f62eecd291f7b75c1e85]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lucas-De-Marchi/drm-i915-Improvements-to-stolen-memory-setup/20220916-044155
base: bb4f6b2281b11b009210f62eecd291f7b75c1e85
config: i386-randconfig-a011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220916/202209160835.MMBeObmU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/b0c14c92efecabadc483675b606c1ce109cfa415
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Lucas-De-Marchi/drm-i915-Improvements-to-stolen-memory-setup/20220916-044155
git checkout b0c14c92efecabadc483675b606c1ce109cfa415
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c:817:58: warning: shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative]
dsm_base = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, GEN12_DSMBASE) & GEN12_BDSM_MASK;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7956:28: note: expanded from macro 'GEN12_BDSM_MASK'
#define GEN12_BDSM_MASK GENMASK(63, 20)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bits.h:38:31: note: expanded from macro 'GENMASK'
(GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bits.h:36:11: note: expanded from macro '__GENMASK'
(~UL(0) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
vim +817 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
798
799 struct intel_memory_region *
800 i915_gem_stolen_lmem_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 type,
801 u16 instance)
802 {
803 struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
804 struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
805 resource_size_t dsm_size, dsm_base, lmem_size;
806 struct intel_memory_region *mem;
807 resource_size_t io_start, io_size;
808 resource_size_t min_page_size;
809
810 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(instance))
811 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
812
813 if (!i915_pci_resource_valid(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR))
814 return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
815
816 /* Use DSM base address instead for stolen memory */
> 817 dsm_base = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, GEN12_DSMBASE) & GEN12_BDSM_MASK;
818 if (IS_DG1(uncore->i915)) {
819 lmem_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR);
820 if (WARN_ON(lmem_size < dsm_base))
821 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
822 } else {
823 resource_size_t lmem_range;
824
825 lmem_range = intel_gt_mcr_read_any(&i915->gt0, XEHP_TILE0_ADDR_RANGE) & 0xFFFF;
826 lmem_size = lmem_range >> XEHP_TILE_LMEM_RANGE_SHIFT;
827 lmem_size *= SZ_1G;
828 }
829
830 dsm_size = lmem_size - dsm_base;
831 if (pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR) < lmem_size) {
832 io_start = 0;
833 io_size = 0;
834 } else {
835 io_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR) + dsm_base;
836 io_size = dsm_size;
837 }
838
839 min_page_size = HAS_64K_PAGES(i915) ? I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K :
840 I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K;
841
842 mem = intel_memory_region_create(i915, dsm_base, dsm_size,
843 min_page_size,
844 io_start, io_size,
845 type, instance,
846 &i915_region_stolen_lmem_ops);
847 if (IS_ERR(mem))
848 return mem;
849
850 /*
851 * TODO: consider creating common helper to just print all the
852 * interesting stuff from intel_memory_region, which we can use for all
853 * our probed regions.
854 */
855
856 drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Stolen Local memory IO start: %pa\n",
857 &mem->io_start);
858 drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Stolen Local DSM base: %pa\n", &dsm_base);
859
860 intel_memory_region_set_name(mem, "stolen-local");
861
862 mem->private = true;
863
864 return mem;
865 }
866
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
tejas.upadhyay@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 2/4] drm/i915: Add missing mask when reading GEN12_DSMBASE
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:04:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202209160835.MMBeObmU-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915-stolen-v1-2-117c5f295bb2@intel.com>
Hi Lucas,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on bb4f6b2281b11b009210f62eecd291f7b75c1e85]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lucas-De-Marchi/drm-i915-Improvements-to-stolen-memory-setup/20220916-044155
base: bb4f6b2281b11b009210f62eecd291f7b75c1e85
config: i386-randconfig-a011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220916/202209160835.MMBeObmU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/b0c14c92efecabadc483675b606c1ce109cfa415
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Lucas-De-Marchi/drm-i915-Improvements-to-stolen-memory-setup/20220916-044155
git checkout b0c14c92efecabadc483675b606c1ce109cfa415
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c:817:58: warning: shift count is negative [-Wshift-count-negative]
dsm_base = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, GEN12_DSMBASE) & GEN12_BDSM_MASK;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7956:28: note: expanded from macro 'GEN12_BDSM_MASK'
#define GEN12_BDSM_MASK GENMASK(63, 20)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bits.h:38:31: note: expanded from macro 'GENMASK'
(GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bits.h:36:11: note: expanded from macro '__GENMASK'
(~UL(0) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - (h))))
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
vim +817 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
798
799 struct intel_memory_region *
800 i915_gem_stolen_lmem_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u16 type,
801 u16 instance)
802 {
803 struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
804 struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(i915->drm.dev);
805 resource_size_t dsm_size, dsm_base, lmem_size;
806 struct intel_memory_region *mem;
807 resource_size_t io_start, io_size;
808 resource_size_t min_page_size;
809
810 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(instance))
811 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
812
813 if (!i915_pci_resource_valid(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR))
814 return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
815
816 /* Use DSM base address instead for stolen memory */
> 817 dsm_base = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, GEN12_DSMBASE) & GEN12_BDSM_MASK;
818 if (IS_DG1(uncore->i915)) {
819 lmem_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR);
820 if (WARN_ON(lmem_size < dsm_base))
821 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
822 } else {
823 resource_size_t lmem_range;
824
825 lmem_range = intel_gt_mcr_read_any(&i915->gt0, XEHP_TILE0_ADDR_RANGE) & 0xFFFF;
826 lmem_size = lmem_range >> XEHP_TILE_LMEM_RANGE_SHIFT;
827 lmem_size *= SZ_1G;
828 }
829
830 dsm_size = lmem_size - dsm_base;
831 if (pci_resource_len(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR) < lmem_size) {
832 io_start = 0;
833 io_size = 0;
834 } else {
835 io_start = pci_resource_start(pdev, GEN12_LMEM_BAR) + dsm_base;
836 io_size = dsm_size;
837 }
838
839 min_page_size = HAS_64K_PAGES(i915) ? I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K :
840 I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_4K;
841
842 mem = intel_memory_region_create(i915, dsm_base, dsm_size,
843 min_page_size,
844 io_start, io_size,
845 type, instance,
846 &i915_region_stolen_lmem_ops);
847 if (IS_ERR(mem))
848 return mem;
849
850 /*
851 * TODO: consider creating common helper to just print all the
852 * interesting stuff from intel_memory_region, which we can use for all
853 * our probed regions.
854 */
855
856 drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Stolen Local memory IO start: %pa\n",
857 &mem->io_start);
858 drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Stolen Local DSM base: %pa\n", &dsm_base);
859
860 intel_memory_region_set_name(mem, "stolen-local");
861
862 mem->private = true;
863
864 return mem;
865 }
866
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-16 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 20:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 0/4] drm/i915: Improvements to stolen memory setup Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 1/4] drm/i915: Move dsm assignment to be after adjustment Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-16 11:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-16 11:57 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-15 20:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 2/4] drm/i915: Add missing mask when reading GEN12_DSMBASE Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Caz Yokoyama
2022-09-16 0:33 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-16 1:04 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-09-16 1:04 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-16 11:58 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-16 11:58 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-15 20:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 3/4] drm/i915: Split i915_gem_init_stolen() Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 22:07 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-16 12:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 3/4] " Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-16 12:20 ` Iddamsetty, Aravind
2022-09-16 16:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-16 16:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 4/4] drm/i915/dgfx: Make failure to setup stolen non-fatal Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 20:39 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Improvements to stolen memory setup Patchwork
2022-09-15 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-09-15 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-09-15 21:54 ` Lucas De Marchi
2022-09-15 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Improvements to stolen memory setup (rev2) Patchwork
2022-09-15 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-09-15 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-09-16 6:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202209160835.MMBeObmU-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.