Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] acpi/tests/bits: add python test that exercizes QEMU bios tables using biosbits

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:30:42PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 12:08 AM Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, Ani Sinha wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 16 Jul 2022, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:06:00PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:20 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:47:27AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > > > >     > > Instead of all this mess, can't we just spawn e.g. "git clone --depth
> > > > >     1"?
> > > > >     > > And if the directory exists I would fetch and checkout.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > There are two reasons I can think of why I do not like this idea:
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > (a) a git clone of a whole directory would download all versions of the
> > > > >     > binary whereas we want only a specific version.
> > > > >
> > > > >     You mention shallow clone yourself, and I used --depth 1 above.
> > > > >
> > > > >     > Downloading a single file
> > > > >     > by shallow cloning or creating a git archive is overkill IMHO when a wget
> > > > >     > style retrieval works just fine.
> > > > >
> > > > >     However, it does not provide for versioning, tagging etc so you have
> > > > >     to implement your own schema.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm I’m not sure if we need all that. Bits has its own versioning mechanism and
> > > > > I think all we need to do is maintain the same versioning logic and maintain
> > > > > binaries of different  versions. Do we really need the power of git/version
> > > > > control here? Dunno.
> > > >
> > > > Well we need some schema. Given we are not using official bits releases
> > > > I don't think we can reuse theirs.
> > >
> > > OK fine. Lets figuire out how to push bits somewhere in git.qemu.org and
> > > the binaries in some other repo first. Everything else hinges on that. We
> > > can fix the rest of the bits later incrementally.
> >
> > DanPB, any thoughts on putting bits on git.qemu.org or where and how to
> > keep the binaries?
> 
> Can we please conclude on this?
> Peter, can you please fork the repo? I have tried many times to reach
> you on IRC but failed.

Probably because of travel around KVM forum.

I think given our CI is under pressure again due to gitlab free tier
limits, tying binaries to CI isn't a great idea at this stage.
Can Ani just upload binaies to qemu.org for now?

-- 
MST