From: Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@digitalocean.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Venkataramanan, Anirudh" <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 12:18:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220925171852.GD59018@sequoia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901160704.25701-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
On 2022-09-01 18:07:04, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> The use of kmap() is being deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page().
>
> There are two main problems with kmap(): (1) It comes with an overhead as
> the mapping space is restricted and protected by a global lock for
> synchronization and (2) it also requires global TLB invalidation when the
> kmap’s pool wraps and it might block when the mapping space is fully
> utilized until a slot becomes available.
>
> With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread, CPU local, can take
> page faults, and can be called from any context (including interrupts).
> It is faster than kmap() in kernels with HIGHMEM enabled. Furthermore,
> the tasks can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to run again, the
> kernel virtual addresses are restored and still valid.
>
> Since its use in fs/ecryptfs is safe everywhere, it should be preferred.
>
> Therefore, replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() in fs/ecryptfs.
>
> Cc: "Venkataramanan, Anirudh" <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> I'm resending this patch because some recipients were missing in the
> previous submission. In the meantime I'm also adding some more information
> in the commit message. There are no changes in the code.
Thanks for the additional information, Fabio. I've tested and applied
it.
Tyler
>
> fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> index e3f5d7f3c8a0..03263ebcccc6 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> @@ -465,10 +465,10 @@ int ecryptfs_encrypt_page(struct page *page)
> }
>
> lower_offset = lower_offset_for_page(crypt_stat, page);
> - enc_extent_virt = kmap(enc_extent_page);
> + enc_extent_virt = kmap_local_page(enc_extent_page);
> rc = ecryptfs_write_lower(ecryptfs_inode, enc_extent_virt, lower_offset,
> PAGE_SIZE);
> - kunmap(enc_extent_page);
> + kunmap_local(enc_extent_virt);
> if (rc < 0) {
> ecryptfs_printk(KERN_ERR,
> "Error attempting to write lower page; rc = [%d]\n",
> @@ -514,10 +514,10 @@ int ecryptfs_decrypt_page(struct page *page)
> BUG_ON(!(crypt_stat->flags & ECRYPTFS_ENCRYPTED));
>
> lower_offset = lower_offset_for_page(crypt_stat, page);
> - page_virt = kmap(page);
> + page_virt = kmap_local_page(page);
> rc = ecryptfs_read_lower(page_virt, lower_offset, PAGE_SIZE,
> ecryptfs_inode);
> - kunmap(page);
> + kunmap_local(page_virt);
> if (rc < 0) {
> ecryptfs_printk(KERN_ERR,
> "Error attempting to read lower page; rc = [%d]\n",
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c b/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c
> index 60bdcaddcbe5..5edf027c8359 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c
> @@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ int ecryptfs_write_lower_page_segment(struct inode *ecryptfs_inode,
>
> offset = ((((loff_t)page_for_lower->index) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> + offset_in_page);
> - virt = kmap(page_for_lower);
> + virt = kmap_local_page(page_for_lower);
> rc = ecryptfs_write_lower(ecryptfs_inode, virt, offset, size);
> if (rc > 0)
> rc = 0;
> - kunmap(page_for_lower);
> + kunmap_local(virt);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -253,11 +253,11 @@ int ecryptfs_read_lower_page_segment(struct page *page_for_ecryptfs,
> int rc;
>
> offset = ((((loff_t)page_index) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset_in_page);
> - virt = kmap(page_for_ecryptfs);
> + virt = kmap_local_page(page_for_ecryptfs);
> rc = ecryptfs_read_lower(virt, offset, size, ecryptfs_inode);
> if (rc > 0)
> rc = 0;
> - kunmap(page_for_ecryptfs);
> + kunmap_local(virt);
> flush_dcache_page(page_for_ecryptfs);
> return rc;
> }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@digitalocean.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Venkataramanan, Anirudh" <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page()
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 12:18:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220925171852.GD59018@sequoia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901160704.25701-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
On 2022-09-01 18:07:04, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> The use of kmap() is being deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page().
>
> There are two main problems with kmap(): (1) It comes with an overhead as
> the mapping space is restricted and protected by a global lock for
> synchronization and (2) it also requires global TLB invalidation when the
> kmap’s pool wraps and it might block when the mapping space is fully
> utilized until a slot becomes available.
>
> With kmap_local_page() the mappings are per thread, CPU local, can take
> page faults, and can be called from any context (including interrupts).
> It is faster than kmap() in kernels with HIGHMEM enabled. Furthermore,
> the tasks can be preempted and, when they are scheduled to run again, the
> kernel virtual addresses are restored and still valid.
>
> Since its use in fs/ecryptfs is safe everywhere, it should be preferred.
>
> Therefore, replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() in fs/ecryptfs.
>
> Cc: "Venkataramanan, Anirudh" <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> I'm resending this patch because some recipients were missing in the
> previous submission. In the meantime I'm also adding some more information
> in the commit message. There are no changes in the code.
Thanks for the additional information, Fabio. I've tested and applied
it.
Tyler
>
> fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> index e3f5d7f3c8a0..03263ebcccc6 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
> @@ -465,10 +465,10 @@ int ecryptfs_encrypt_page(struct page *page)
> }
>
> lower_offset = lower_offset_for_page(crypt_stat, page);
> - enc_extent_virt = kmap(enc_extent_page);
> + enc_extent_virt = kmap_local_page(enc_extent_page);
> rc = ecryptfs_write_lower(ecryptfs_inode, enc_extent_virt, lower_offset,
> PAGE_SIZE);
> - kunmap(enc_extent_page);
> + kunmap_local(enc_extent_virt);
> if (rc < 0) {
> ecryptfs_printk(KERN_ERR,
> "Error attempting to write lower page; rc = [%d]\n",
> @@ -514,10 +514,10 @@ int ecryptfs_decrypt_page(struct page *page)
> BUG_ON(!(crypt_stat->flags & ECRYPTFS_ENCRYPTED));
>
> lower_offset = lower_offset_for_page(crypt_stat, page);
> - page_virt = kmap(page);
> + page_virt = kmap_local_page(page);
> rc = ecryptfs_read_lower(page_virt, lower_offset, PAGE_SIZE,
> ecryptfs_inode);
> - kunmap(page);
> + kunmap_local(page_virt);
> if (rc < 0) {
> ecryptfs_printk(KERN_ERR,
> "Error attempting to read lower page; rc = [%d]\n",
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c b/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c
> index 60bdcaddcbe5..5edf027c8359 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c
> @@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ int ecryptfs_write_lower_page_segment(struct inode *ecryptfs_inode,
>
> offset = ((((loff_t)page_for_lower->index) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> + offset_in_page);
> - virt = kmap(page_for_lower);
> + virt = kmap_local_page(page_for_lower);
> rc = ecryptfs_write_lower(ecryptfs_inode, virt, offset, size);
> if (rc > 0)
> rc = 0;
> - kunmap(page_for_lower);
> + kunmap_local(virt);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -253,11 +253,11 @@ int ecryptfs_read_lower_page_segment(struct page *page_for_ecryptfs,
> int rc;
>
> offset = ((((loff_t)page_index) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset_in_page);
> - virt = kmap(page_for_ecryptfs);
> + virt = kmap_local_page(page_for_ecryptfs);
> rc = ecryptfs_read_lower(virt, offset, size, ecryptfs_inode);
> if (rc > 0)
> rc = 0;
> - kunmap(page_for_ecryptfs);
> + kunmap_local(virt);
> flush_dcache_page(page_for_ecryptfs);
> return rc;
> }
> --
> 2.37.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-25 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 16:07 [RESEND PATCH] ecryptfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-09-01 16:07 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-09-25 17:18 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2022-09-25 17:18 ` Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220925171852.GD59018@sequoia \
--to=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sforshee@digitalocean.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.