All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
	ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	sdf@google.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, fw@strlen.de,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, razor@blackwall.org,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] docs: add more netlink docs (incl. spec docs)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:34:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929133413.GA6761@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220929011122.1139374-2-kuba@kernel.org>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 06:11:17PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> +Answer requests
> +---------------
> +
> +Older families do not reply to all of the commands, especially NEW / ADD
> +commands. User only gets information whether the operation succeeded or
> +not via the ACK. Try to find useful data to return. Once the command is
> +added whether it replies with a full message or only an ACK is uAPI and
> +cannot be changed. It's better to err on the side of replying.
> +
> +Specifically NEW and ADD commands should reply with information identifying
> +the created object such as the allocated object's ID.
> +
> +Having to rely on ``NLM_F_ECHO`` is a hack, not a valid design.
> +
> +NLM_F_ECHO
> +----------
> +
> +Make sure to pass the request info to genl_notify() to allow ``NLM_F_ECHO``
> +to take effect.

Do you mean that netlink commands should properly handle NLM_F_ECHO,
although they should also design their API so that users don't need it?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-29  1:11 [PATCH net-next 0/6] Netlink protocol specs Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  1:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] docs: add more netlink docs (incl. spec docs) Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  8:15   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-09-29  9:43   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-09-29 13:34   ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2022-09-29 14:32     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29 15:11       ` Guillaume Nault
2022-09-29 15:47         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29 15:52           ` Guillaume Nault
2022-09-29  1:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] netlink: add schemas for YAML specs Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  1:11 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: add basic C code generators for Netlink Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  1:11 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] netlink: add a proto specification for FOU Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  9:02   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-09-29  9:06     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-09-29 14:41     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  1:11 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: fou: regenerate the uAPI from the spec Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-29  1:11 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: fou: use policy and operation tables generated " Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220929133413.GA6761@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.