Re: [PATCH v8 02/13] rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 03:54:25PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:10 PM Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 06:01:31PM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > @@ -269,10 +294,14 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
> > >       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_lock, flags);
> > >
> > >       /*
> > > -      * Bypass wakeup overrides previous deferments. In case
> > > -      * of callback storm, no need to wake up too early.
> > > +      * Bypass wakeup overrides previous deferments. In case of
> > > +      * callback storm, no need to wake up too early.
> > >        */
> > > -     if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS) {
> > > +     if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY &&
> > > +         READ_ONCE(rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup) == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT) {
> >
> > No need for READ_ONCE() here.
> >
> > > +             mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + jiffies_till_flush);
> > > +             WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> > > +     } else if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS) {
> > >               mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + 2);
> > >               WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> > >       } else {
> > > @@ -611,6 +682,8 @@ static void nocb_gp_wait(struct rcu_data *my_rdp)
> > >       unsigned long flags;
> > >       bool gotcbs = false;
> > >       unsigned long j = jiffies;
> > > +     bool lazy = false;
> > > +     long lazy_ncbs;
> >
> > Looks like lazy_ncbs can be declared withing the loop, as well as bypass_cbs.
> >
> > Anyway, apart from such boring cosmectics:
> >
> > Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks, I folded the cosmetic suggestions with the Ack and pushed it to:
> https://github.com/joelagnel/linux-kernel.git (branch rcu-next-oct.12.22)

Just following back up with Frederic to see if all of your guys' words
had the same meanings.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul