All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com, urezki@gmail.com,
	neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	youssefesmat@google.com, surenb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/13] rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier()
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 22:47:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221014204750.GA1119620@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221014154606.GJ4221@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:46:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:19:28AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > I agree with the discussion, though if all CBs are in the bypass list,
> > the patch will also save 2 jiffies.
> > 
> > So just commit messages that need rework then? This one can be taken instead:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/21ECDA9F-81B1-4D22-8B03-020FB5DADA4F@joelfernandes.org/T/#m14d21fbce23539a521693a4184b28ddc55d7d2c5
> 
> This one looks plausible to me.

With the following modified diff (passed 25 hours of TREE01):

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 96d678c9cfb6..7f1f6f792240 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3914,6 +3914,8 @@ static void rcu_barrier_entrain(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	unsigned long gseq = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
 	unsigned long lseq = READ_ONCE(rdp->barrier_seq_snap);
+	bool wake_nocb = false;
+	bool was_alldone = false;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&rcu_state.barrier_lock);
 	if (rcu_seq_state(lseq) || !rcu_seq_state(gseq) || rcu_seq_ctr(lseq) != rcu_seq_ctr(gseq))
@@ -3922,7 +3924,14 @@ static void rcu_barrier_entrain(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	rdp->barrier_head.func = rcu_barrier_callback;
 	debug_rcu_head_queue(&rdp->barrier_head);
 	rcu_nocb_lock(rdp);
+	/*
+	 * Flush bypass and wakeup rcuog if we add callbacks to an empty regular
+	 * queue. This way we don't wait for bypass timer that can reach seconds
+	 * if it's fully lazy.
+	 */
+	was_alldone = rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp) && !rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(rdp, NULL, jiffies));
+	wake_nocb = was_alldone && rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
 	if (rcu_segcblist_entrain(&rdp->cblist, &rdp->barrier_head)) {
 		atomic_inc(&rcu_state.barrier_cpu_count);
 	} else {
@@ -3930,6 +3939,8 @@ static void rcu_barrier_entrain(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		rcu_barrier_trace(TPS("IRQNQ"), -1, rcu_state.barrier_sequence);
 	}
 	rcu_nocb_unlock(rdp);
+	if (wake_nocb)
+		wake_nocb_gp(rdp, false);
 	smp_store_release(&rdp->barrier_seq_snap, gseq);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index d4a97e40ea9c..925dd98f8b23 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp);
 static struct swait_queue_head *rcu_nocb_gp_get(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 static void rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup(struct swait_queue_head *sq);
 static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp);
+static bool wake_nocb_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool force);
 static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 				  unsigned long j);
 static bool rcu_nocb_try_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index f77a6d7e1356..094fd454b6c3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1558,6 +1558,11 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 {
 }
 
+static bool wake_nocb_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool force)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool rcu_nocb_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 				  unsigned long j)
 {

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-14 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-11 18:01 [PATCH v8 00/13] rcu: call_rcu() power improvements Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-14 14:21   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 14:40     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-14 15:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 15:19         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-14 15:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 20:47             ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-10-16 15:16               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-16 15:56                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 23:10   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-12 19:54     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-14 15:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] rcu: Refactor code a bit in rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] rcu: shrinker for lazy rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] percpu-refcount: Use call_rcu_flush() for atomic switch Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] rcu/sync: Use call_rcu_flush() instead of call_rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] rcu/rcuscale: Use call_rcu_flush() for async reader test Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] rcu/rcutorture: Use call_rcu_flush() where needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] scsi/scsi_error: Use call_rcu_flush() instead of call_rcu() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] workqueue: Make queue_rcu_work() use call_rcu_flush() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_flush() instead of call_rcu() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] rcu/debug: Add wake-up debugging for lazy callbacks Joel Fernandes (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221014204750.GA1119620@lothringen \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.