From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add iommu and power-domain support
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:42:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221017184233.GA2260080-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017070858.13902-2-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:08:56PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
>
> Add iommu and power-domain support, and add examples for MT8195, which
> has two PCIe ports with different clocks and phys.
Is that really a big enough difference to add a whole other example
when we have a dts file with it too? I don't think so, and we certainly
don't need to show all instances either.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add iommu and power-domain support
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:42:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221017184233.GA2260080-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017070858.13902-2-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:08:56PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> From: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
>
> Add iommu and power-domain support, and add examples for MT8195, which
> has two PCIe ports with different clocks and phys.
Is that really a big enough difference to add a whole other example
when we have a dts file with it too? I don't think so, and we certainly
don't need to show all instances either.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-17 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 7:08 [PATCH v1 0/3] Add driver nodes for MT8195 SoC Tinghan Shen
2022-10-17 7:08 ` Tinghan Shen
2022-10-17 7:08 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add iommu and power-domain support Tinghan Shen
2022-10-17 7:08 ` Tinghan Shen
2022-10-17 18:42 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-10-17 18:42 ` Rob Herring
2022-10-18 1:49 ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
2022-10-18 1:49 ` TingHan Shen (沈廷翰)
2022-10-17 7:08 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] arm64: dts: mt8195: Add pcie and pcie phy nodes Tinghan Shen
2022-10-17 7:08 ` Tinghan Shen
2022-10-19 8:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-19 8:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-20 2:10 ` Jianjun Wang
2022-10-20 2:10 ` Jianjun Wang
2022-10-17 7:08 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: mt8195: Add venc node Tinghan Shen
2022-10-17 7:08 ` Tinghan Shen
2022-10-18 22:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-18 22:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-10-19 8:51 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-19 8:51 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-10-19 8:56 ` Irui Wang
2022-10-19 8:56 ` Irui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221017184233.GA2260080-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=tinghan.shen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.