From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
f4bug@amsat.org, sgarzare@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] vhost-vdpa: add support for vIOMMU
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:49:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102084507-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221031125702.1445168-3-lulu@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:57:02PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> Add support for vIOMMU. add the new function to deal with iommu MR.
> - during iommu_region_add register a specific IOMMU notifier,
> and store all notifiers in a list.
> - during iommu_region_del, compare and delete the IOMMU notifier from the list
>
> Verified in vp_vdpa and vdpa_sim_net driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h | 10 +++
> 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> index 3ff9ce3501..e483d6e60b 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include "cpu.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "qapi/error.h"
> +#include "hw/virtio/virtio-access.h"
>
> /*
> * Return one past the end of the end of section. Be careful with uint64_t
> @@ -44,7 +45,6 @@ static bool vhost_vdpa_listener_skipped_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
> uint64_t iova_min,
> uint64_t iova_max)
> {
> - Int128 llend;
>
> if ((!memory_region_is_ram(section->mr) &&
> !memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) ||
> @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ static bool vhost_vdpa_listener_skipped_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
> return true;
> }
>
> - llend = vhost_vdpa_section_end(section);
> - if (int128_gt(llend, int128_make64(iova_max))) {
> - error_report("RAM section out of device range (max=0x%" PRIx64
> - ", end addr=0x%" PRIx64 ")",
> - iova_max, int128_get64(llend));
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> return false;
> }
>
OK so you said this check is not really needed, and I would like
a separate patch to just drop this check with proper
explanation why it's safe.
Sorry if I was not clear this is what I asked for!
Thanks!
> @@ -173,6 +165,106 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_commit(MemoryListener *listener)
> v->iotlb_batch_begin_sent = false;
> }
>
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb)
> +{
> + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu = container_of(n, struct vdpa_iommu, n);
> +
> + hwaddr iova = iotlb->iova + iommu->iommu_offset;
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = iommu->dev;
> + void *vaddr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (iotlb->target_as != &address_space_memory) {
> + error_report("Wrong target AS \"%s\", only system memory is allowed",
> + iotlb->target_as->name ? iotlb->target_as->name : "none");
> + return;
> + }
> + RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();
> + vhost_vdpa_iotlb_batch_begin_once(v);
> +
> + if ((iotlb->perm & IOMMU_RW) != IOMMU_NONE) {
> + bool read_only;
> +
> + if (!memory_get_xlat_addr(iotlb, &vaddr, NULL, &read_only, NULL)) {
> + return;
> + }
> + ret =
> + vhost_vdpa_dma_map(v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, vaddr, read_only);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_report("vhost_vdpa_dma_map(%p, 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", "
> + "0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", %p) = %d (%m)",
> + v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, vaddr, ret);
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_report("vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(%p, 0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ", "
> + "0x%" HWADDR_PRIx ") = %d (%m)",
> + v, iova, iotlb->addr_mask + 1, ret);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> + MemoryRegionSection *section)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa, listener);
> +
> + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu;
> + Int128 end;
> + int iommu_idx;
> + IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + iommu_mr = IOMMU_MEMORY_REGION(section->mr);
> +
> + iommu = g_malloc0(sizeof(*iommu));
> + end = int128_add(int128_make64(section->offset_within_region),
> + section->size);
> + end = int128_sub(end, int128_one());
> + iommu_idx = memory_region_iommu_attrs_to_index(iommu_mr,
> + MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> +
> + iommu->iommu_mr = iommu_mr;
> +
> + iommu_notifier_init(
> + &iommu->n, vhost_vdpa_iommu_map_notify, IOMMU_NOTIFIER_IOTLB_EVENTS,
> + section->offset_within_region, int128_get64(end), iommu_idx);
> + iommu->iommu_offset =
> + section->offset_within_address_space - section->offset_within_region;
> + iommu->dev = v;
> +
> + ret = memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(section->mr, &iommu->n, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + g_free(iommu);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&v->iommu_list, iommu, iommu_next);
> + memory_region_iommu_replay(iommu->iommu_mr, &iommu->n);
> +
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
> + MemoryRegionSection *section)
> +{
> + struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(listener, struct vhost_vdpa, listener);
> +
> + struct vdpa_iommu *iommu;
> +
> + QLIST_FOREACH(iommu, &v->iommu_list, iommu_next)
> + {
> + if (MEMORY_REGION(iommu->iommu_mr) == section->mr &&
> + iommu->n.start == section->offset_within_region) {
> + memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier(section->mr, &iommu->n);
> + QLIST_REMOVE(iommu, iommu_next);
> + g_free(iommu);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> MemoryRegionSection *section)
> {
> @@ -186,6 +278,10 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
> v->iova_range.last)) {
> return;
> }
> + if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> + vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_add(listener, section);
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) !=
> (section->offset_within_region & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK))) {
> @@ -260,6 +356,10 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_listener_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
> v->iova_range.last)) {
> return;
> }
> + if (memory_region_is_iommu(section->mr)) {
> + vhost_vdpa_iommu_region_del(listener, section);
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely((section->offset_within_address_space & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) !=
> (section->offset_within_region & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK))) {
> @@ -587,7 +687,6 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> v = dev->opaque;
> trace_vhost_vdpa_cleanup(dev, v);
> vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit(dev, dev->nvqs);
> - memory_listener_unregister(&v->listener);
> vhost_vdpa_svq_cleanup(dev);
>
> dev->opaque = NULL;
> @@ -1127,7 +1226,8 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_dev_start(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool started)
> }
>
> if (started) {
> - memory_listener_register(&v->listener, &address_space_memory);
> + memory_listener_register(&v->listener, dev->vdev->dma_as);
> +
> return vhost_vdpa_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> } else {
> vhost_vdpa_reset_device(dev);
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> index d10a89303e..92bfc4785f 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.h
> @@ -41,8 +41,18 @@ typedef struct vhost_vdpa {
> void *shadow_vq_ops_opaque;
> struct vhost_dev *dev;
> VhostVDPAHostNotifier notifier[VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX];
> + QLIST_HEAD(, vdpa_iommu) iommu_list;
> + IOMMUNotifier n;
> } VhostVDPA;
>
> +typedef struct vdpa_iommu {
> + struct vhost_vdpa *dev;
> + IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr;
> + hwaddr iommu_offset;
> + IOMMUNotifier n;
> + QLIST_ENTRY(vdpa_iommu) iommu_next;
> +} VDPAIommu;
> +
We mostly say IOMMU. VDPAIOMMU is a mouthful So maybe
VDPAIOMMUState or some such.
> int vhost_vdpa_dma_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, hwaddr iova, hwaddr size,
> void *vaddr, bool readonly);
> int vhost_vdpa_dma_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v, hwaddr iova, hwaddr size);
> --
> 2.34.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-31 12:57 [PATCH v10 0/2] vhost-vdpa: add support for vIOMMU Cindy Lu
2022-10-31 12:57 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] vfio: move implement of vfio_get_xlat_addr() to memory.c Cindy Lu
2022-11-02 12:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-10-31 12:57 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] vhost-vdpa: add support for vIOMMU Cindy Lu
2022-11-02 12:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-11-02 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-02 12:39 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-02 12:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221102084507-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.