From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_between() when possible
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:43:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211161436.A45AD719A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114164558.1180362-4-Jason@zx2c4.com>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:45:58PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> - (get_random_u32_below(1024) + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
> + get_random_u32_between(1, 1024 + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
I really don't like "between". Can't this be named "inclusive" (and
avoid adding 1 everywhere, which seems ugly), or at least named
something less ambiguous?
> - n = get_random_u32_below(100) + 1;
> + n = get_random_u32_between(1, 101);
Because I find this much less readable. "Below 100" is clear: 0-99
inclusive, plus 1, so 1-100 inclusive. "Between 1 and 101" is not obvious
to me to mean: 1-100 inclusive.
These seem so much nicer:
get_random_u32_inclusive(1, 1024)
get_random_u32_inclusive(1, 100)
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Chr istoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_between() when possible
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:43:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211161436.A45AD719A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114164558.1180362-4-Jason@zx2c4.com>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:45:58PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> - (get_random_u32_below(1024) + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
> + get_random_u32_between(1, 1024 + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
I really don't like "between". Can't this be named "inclusive" (and
avoid adding 1 everywhere, which seems ugly), or at least named
something less ambiguous?
> - n = get_random_u32_below(100) + 1;
> + n = get_random_u32_between(1, 101);
Because I find this much less readable. "Below 100" is clear: 0-99
inclusive, plus 1, so 1-100 inclusive. "Between 1 and 101" is not obvious
to me to mean: 1-100 inclusive.
These seem so much nicer:
get_random_u32_inclusive(1, 1024)
get_random_u32_inclusive(1, 100)
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Christoph Böhmwalder" <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_between() when possible
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:43:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211161436.A45AD719A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221114164558.1180362-4-Jason@zx2c4.com>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:45:58PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> - (get_random_u32_below(1024) + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
> + get_random_u32_between(1, 1024 + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
I really don't like "between". Can't this be named "inclusive" (and
avoid adding 1 everywhere, which seems ugly), or at least named
something less ambiguous?
> - n = get_random_u32_below(100) + 1;
> + n = get_random_u32_between(1, 101);
Because I find this much less readable. "Below 100" is clear: 0-99
inclusive, plus 1, so 1-100 inclusive. "Between 1 and 101" is not obvious
to me to mean: 1-100 inclusive.
These seem so much nicer:
get_random_u32_inclusive(1, 1024)
get_random_u32_inclusive(1, 100)
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-14 16:45 [PATCH v2 0/3] convert tree to get_random_u32_{below,above,between}() Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_below() instead of deprecated function Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 17:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-14 17:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-14 17:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-15 9:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-11-14 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_{above,below}() instead of manual loop Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_between() when possible Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-14 16:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-16 22:43 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-16 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-16 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-16 23:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-16 23:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-16 23:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:43 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:43 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:43 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 0:47 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:47 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:47 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 15:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-11-17 15:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-11-17 15:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-11-17 16:19 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 16:19 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 16:19 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 22:15 ` David Laight
2022-11-17 22:15 ` David Laight
2022-11-17 22:15 ` David Laight
2022-11-17 2:05 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 2:05 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 2:05 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 10:32 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-17 10:32 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-17 10:32 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-17 20:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] convert tree to get_random_u32_{below,above,inclusive}() Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_below() instead of deprecated function Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 21:59 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 21:59 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 21:59 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 20:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_{above,below}() instead of manual loop Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 21:58 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 21:58 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 21:58 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 20:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] treewide: use get_random_u32_inclusive() when possible Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 20:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 21:57 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 21:57 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 21:57 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 22:10 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 22:10 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-11-17 22:10 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202211161436.A45AD719A@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.