[PATCH] RCU fundamentals: too many ares

[PATCH] RCU fundamentals: too many ares

[Elad Lahav]

Signed-off-by: Elad Lahav <e2lahav@gmail.com>
---
 defer/rcufundamental.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/defer/rcufundamental.tex b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
index 82d04bba..39b2f7ff 100644
--- a/defer/rcufundamental.tex
+++ b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ that single-item lookups are much more common in practice than are
 full-data-structure traversals.
 After all, full-data-structure traversals are much more expensive than
 single-item lookups, so developers are motivated to avoid such traversals.
-Not only are concurrent updates are less likely to affect a single-item
+Not only are concurrent updates less likely to affect a single-item
 lookup than they are a full traversal, but it is also the case that an
 isolated single-item lookup has no way of detecting such inconsistencies.
 As a result, in the common case, such inconsistencies are not just
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] RCU fundamentals: too many ares

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:23:45AM -0500, Elad Lahav wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Elad Lahav <e2lahav@gmail.com>

Good catch!  Queued and pushed, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  defer/rcufundamental.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/defer/rcufundamental.tex b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
> index 82d04bba..39b2f7ff 100644
> --- a/defer/rcufundamental.tex
> +++ b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ that single-item lookups are much more common in practice than are
>  full-data-structure traversals.
>  After all, full-data-structure traversals are much more expensive than
>  single-item lookups, so developers are motivated to avoid such traversals.
> -Not only are concurrent updates are less likely to affect a single-item
> +Not only are concurrent updates less likely to affect a single-item
>  lookup than they are a full traversal, but it is also the case that an
>  isolated single-item lookup has no way of detecting such inconsistencies.
>  As a result, in the common case, such inconsistencies are not just
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>