From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow indefinite spinning on a preempted owner
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 19:59:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221126095932.1234527-16-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221126095932.1234527-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
Provide an option that holds off queueing indefinitely while the lock
owner is preempted. This could reduce queueing latencies for very
overcommitted vcpu situations.
This is disabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
index 7f6b41627351..1c9079489b50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/qspinlock.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static int head_spins __read_mostly = (1<<8);
static bool pv_yield_owner __read_mostly = true;
static bool pv_yield_allow_steal __read_mostly = false;
+static bool pv_spin_on_preempted_owner __read_mostly = false;
static bool pv_yield_prev __read_mostly = true;
static bool pv_yield_propagate_owner __read_mostly = true;
static bool pv_prod_head __read_mostly = false;
@@ -191,11 +192,12 @@ static struct qnode *get_tail_qnode(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
BUG();
}
-/* Called inside spin_begin() */
-static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool mustq)
+/* Called inside spin_begin(). Returns whether or not the vCPU was preempted. */
+static __always_inline bool __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt, bool mustq)
{
int owner;
u32 yield_count;
+ bool preempted = false;
BUG_ON(!(val & _Q_LOCKED_VAL));
@@ -213,6 +215,8 @@ static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
spin_end();
+ preempted = true;
+
/*
* Read the lock word after sampling the yield count. On the other side
* there may a wmb because the yield count update is done by the
@@ -229,29 +233,32 @@ static __always_inline void __yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32
if (mustq)
set_mustq(lock);
spin_begin();
+
/* Don't relax if we yielded. Maybe we should? */
- return;
+ return preempted;
}
spin_begin();
relax:
spin_cpu_relax();
+
+ return preempted;
}
-/* Called inside spin_begin() */
-static __always_inline void yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)
+/* Called inside spin_begin(). Returns whether or not the vCPU was preempted. */
+static __always_inline bool yield_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)
{
- __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
+ return __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, false);
}
-/* Called inside spin_begin() */
-static __always_inline void yield_head_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)
+/* Called inside spin_begin(). Returns whether or not the vCPU was preempted. */
+static __always_inline bool yield_head_to_locked_owner(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val, bool paravirt)
{
bool mustq = false;
if ((val & _Q_MUST_Q_VAL) && pv_yield_allow_steal)
mustq = true;
- __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, mustq);
+ return __yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt, mustq);
}
static __always_inline void propagate_yield_cpu(struct qnode *node, u32 val, int *set_yield_cpu, bool paravirt)
@@ -361,13 +368,16 @@ static __always_inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, bool parav
int iters = 0;
u32 val;
- if (!steal_spins)
+ if (!steal_spins) {
+ /* XXX: should spin_on_preempted_owner do anything here? */
return false;
+ }
/* Attempt to steal the lock */
spin_begin();
-
do {
+ bool preempted = false;
+
val = READ_ONCE(lock->val);
if (val & _Q_MUST_Q_VAL)
break;
@@ -378,10 +388,23 @@ static __always_inline bool try_to_steal_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, bool parav
return true;
spin_begin();
} else {
- yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
+ preempted = yield_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
}
- iters++;
+ if (preempted) {
+ if (!pv_spin_on_preempted_owner)
+ iters++;
+ /*
+ * pv_spin_on_preempted_owner don't increase iters
+ * while the owner is preempted -- we won't interfere
+ * with it by definition. This could introduce some
+ * latency issue if we continually observe preempted
+ * owners, but hopefully that's a rare corner case of
+ * a badly oversubscribed system.
+ */
+ } else {
+ iters++;
+ }
} while (!steal_break(val, iters, paravirt));
spin_end();
@@ -453,15 +476,22 @@ static __always_inline void queued_spin_lock_mcs_queue(struct qspinlock *lock, b
/* We're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the lock. */
spin_begin();
for (;;) {
+ bool preempted;
+
val = READ_ONCE(lock->val);
if (!(val & _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
break;
propagate_yield_cpu(node, val, &set_yield_cpu, paravirt);
- yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
+ preempted = yield_head_to_locked_owner(lock, val, paravirt);
if (!maybe_stealers)
continue;
- iters++;
+ if (preempted) {
+ if (!pv_spin_on_preempted_owner)
+ iters++;
+ } else {
+ iters++;
+ }
if (!mustq && iters >= get_head_spins(paravirt)) {
mustq = true;
@@ -644,6 +674,22 @@ static int pv_yield_allow_steal_get(void *data, u64 *val)
DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_yield_allow_steal, pv_yield_allow_steal_get, pv_yield_allow_steal_set, "%llu\n");
+static int pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_set(void *data, u64 val)
+{
+ pv_spin_on_preempted_owner = !!val;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_get(void *data, u64 *val)
+{
+ *val = pv_spin_on_preempted_owner;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_spin_on_preempted_owner, pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_get, pv_spin_on_preempted_owner_set, "%llu\n");
+
static int pv_yield_prev_set(void *data, u64 val)
{
pv_yield_prev = !!val;
@@ -700,6 +746,7 @@ static __init int spinlock_debugfs_init(void)
if (is_shared_processor()) {
debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_owner);
debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_allow_steal", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_allow_steal);
+ debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_spin_on_preempted_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_spin_on_preempted_owner);
debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_prev", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_prev);
debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_yield_propagate_owner", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_yield_propagate_owner);
debugfs_create_file("qspl_pv_prod_head", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_prod_head);
--
2.37.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-26 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-26 9:59 [PATCH v3 00/17] powerpc: alternate queued spinlock implementation Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] powerpc/qspinlock: add mcs queueing for contended waiters Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] powerpc/qspinlock: use a half-word store to unlock to avoid larx/stcx Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] powerpc/qspinlock: convert atomic operations to assembly Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow new waiters to steal the lock before queueing Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] powerpc/qspinlock: theft prevention to control latency Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] powerpc/qspinlock: store owner CPU in lock word Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] powerpc/qspinlock: paravirt yield to lock owner Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] powerpc/qspinlock: implement option to yield to previous node Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow stealing when head of queue yields Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow propagation of yield CPU down the queue Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] powerpc/qspinlock: add ability to prod new queue head CPU Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] powerpc/qspinlock: allow lock stealing in trylock and lock fastpath Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] powerpc/qspinlock: use spin_begin/end API Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] powerpc/qspinlock: reduce remote node steal spins Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] powerpc/qspinlock: provide accounting and options for sleepy locks Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-26 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] powerpc/qspinlock: add compile-time tuning adjustments Nicholas Piggin
2022-11-28 3:11 ` [PATCH v3 real 01/17] powerpc/qspinlock: powerpc qspinlock implementation Nicholas Piggin
2022-12-08 12:39 ` (subset) [PATCH v3 00/17] powerpc: alternate queued spinlock implementation Michael Ellerman
2023-04-13 10:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221126095932.1234527-16-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.