From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: msc313: Fix function prototype mismatch in msc313_rtc_probe()
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:46:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202212012043.C4ED0824@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef3c1a62-029e-ffae-8a37-fde35a8235d5@wanadoo.fr>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 09:05:28AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 19/11/2022 à 00:31, Kees Cook a écrit :
> > With clang's kernel control flow integrity (kCFI, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG),
> > indirect call targets are validated against the expected function
> > pointer prototype to make sure the call target is valid to help mitigate
> > ROP attacks. If they are not identical, there is a failure at run time,
> > which manifests as either a kernel panic or thread getting killed.
> >
> > msc313_rtc_probe() was passing clk_disable_unprepare() directly, which
> > did not have matching prototypes for devm_add_action_or_reset()'s callback
> > argument. Add a wrapper and remove the cast.
> >
> > This was found as a result of Clang's new -Wcast-function-type-strict
> > flag, which is more sensitive than the simpler -Wcast-function-type,
> > which only checks for type width mismatches.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202211041527.HD8TLSE1-lkp@intel.com
> > Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
> > Cc: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
> > index f3fde013c4b8..36e3e77f303e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
> > @@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ static irqreturn_t msc313_rtc_interrupt(s32 irq, void *dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> > +static void msc313_clk_disable_unprepare(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct clk *clk = data;
> > +
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int msc313_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -224,7 +231,7 @@ static int msc313_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, (void (*) (void *))clk_disable_unprepare, clk);
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, msc313_clk_disable_unprepare, clk);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
>
> Hi,
>
> another way to fix it, is to use devm_clk_get_enabled().
>
> It removes some LoC instead of introducing some new ones and saves a few
> bytes of memory.
Hrm, I'm not familiar with the clk stuff here -- how do I use it? Should
it just be like this? (The NULL argument is ok?)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
index f3fde013c4b8..8d7737e0e2e0 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
@@ -212,22 +212,12 @@ static int msc313_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
- clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
dev_err(dev, "No input reference clock\n");
return PTR_ERR(clk);
}
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable the reference clock, %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
- ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, (void (*) (void *))clk_disable_unprepare, clk);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
writew(rate & 0xFFFF, priv->rtc_base + REG_RTC_FREQ_CW_L);
writew((rate >> 16) & 0xFFFF, priv->rtc_base + REG_RTC_FREQ_CW_H);
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: msc313: Fix function prototype mismatch in msc313_rtc_probe()
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:46:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202212012043.C4ED0824@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef3c1a62-029e-ffae-8a37-fde35a8235d5@wanadoo.fr>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 09:05:28AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 19/11/2022 à 00:31, Kees Cook a écrit :
> > With clang's kernel control flow integrity (kCFI, CONFIG_CFI_CLANG),
> > indirect call targets are validated against the expected function
> > pointer prototype to make sure the call target is valid to help mitigate
> > ROP attacks. If they are not identical, there is a failure at run time,
> > which manifests as either a kernel panic or thread getting killed.
> >
> > msc313_rtc_probe() was passing clk_disable_unprepare() directly, which
> > did not have matching prototypes for devm_add_action_or_reset()'s callback
> > argument. Add a wrapper and remove the cast.
> >
> > This was found as a result of Clang's new -Wcast-function-type-strict
> > flag, which is more sensitive than the simpler -Wcast-function-type,
> > which only checks for type width mismatches.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202211041527.HD8TLSE1-lkp@intel.com
> > Cc: Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>
> > Cc: Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
> > index f3fde013c4b8..36e3e77f303e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
> > @@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ static irqreturn_t msc313_rtc_interrupt(s32 irq, void *dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> > +static void msc313_clk_disable_unprepare(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct clk *clk = data;
> > +
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int msc313_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -224,7 +231,7 @@ static int msc313_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, (void (*) (void *))clk_disable_unprepare, clk);
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, msc313_clk_disable_unprepare, clk);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
>
> Hi,
>
> another way to fix it, is to use devm_clk_get_enabled().
>
> It removes some LoC instead of introducing some new ones and saves a few
> bytes of memory.
Hrm, I'm not familiar with the clk stuff here -- how do I use it? Should
it just be like this? (The NULL argument is ok?)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
index f3fde013c4b8..8d7737e0e2e0 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-msc313.c
@@ -212,22 +212,12 @@ static int msc313_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
- clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
+ clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
dev_err(dev, "No input reference clock\n");
return PTR_ERR(clk);
}
- ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable the reference clock, %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
- ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, (void (*) (void *))clk_disable_unprepare, clk);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
writew(rate & 0xFFFF, priv->rtc_base + REG_RTC_FREQ_CW_L);
writew((rate >> 16) & 0xFFFF, priv->rtc_base + REG_RTC_FREQ_CW_H);
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 23:31 [PATCH] rtc: msc313: Fix function prototype mismatch in msc313_rtc_probe() Kees Cook
2022-11-18 23:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-19 8:05 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-11-19 8:05 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-12-02 4:46 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-12-02 4:46 ` Kees Cook
2022-12-02 17:54 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-12-02 17:54 ` Christophe JAILLET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202212012043.C4ED0824@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=daniel@thingy.jp \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.