[nacked] mm-mempolicy-failed-to-disable-numa-balancing.patch removed from -mm tree

[nacked] mm-mempolicy-failed-to-disable-numa-balancing.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/mempolicy: failed to disable numa balancing
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-mempolicy-failed-to-disable-numa-balancing.patch

This patch was dropped because it was nacked

------------------------------------------------------
From: tzm <tcm1030@163.com>
Subject: mm/mempolicy: failed to disable numa balancing
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 22:16:30 +0800

The kernel fails to disable numa balancing policy permanently when the
user passes <numa_balancing=disable> to the boot cmdline parameters.  The
numabalancing_override variable is 1 for enable -1 for disable.  So,
!numabalancing_override will always be true, which causes this bug.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221202141630.41220-1-tcm1030@163.com
Signed-off-by: tzm <tcm1030@163.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/mempolicy.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-failed-to-disable-numa-balancing
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_e
 	if (numabalancing_override)
 		set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
 
-	if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+	if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && (numabalancing_override == 1)) {
 		pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. Configure with numa_balancing= or the kernel.numa_balancing sysctl\n",
 			numabalancing_default ? "Enabling" : "Disabling");
 		set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_default);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from tcm1030@163.com are