From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] srcu: Remove pre-flip memory barrier
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:16:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221222121612.GA44777@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6NqYydTKFEwJIqN@boqun-archlinux>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:19:47PM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 06:30:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> By "same effect" you mean removing E results in the exist-clause
> triggered? If so, then our environments disagree with each other ;-)
Nope, removing D :-)
(And yeah probably I misread your previous mail and we weren't talking
about the same thing...)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-18 19:13 [RFC 0/2] srcu: Remove pre-flip memory barrier Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-18 19:13 ` [RFC 1/2] srcu: Remove comment about prior read lock counts Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-18 21:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-18 21:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-18 19:13 ` [RFC 2/2] srcu: Remove memory barrier "E" as it is not required Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-12-18 21:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-18 23:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-19 0:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-18 20:57 ` [RFC 0/2] srcu: Remove pre-flip memory barrier Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-18 21:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-18 23:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-18 23:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-19 0:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-19 0:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-19 1:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-20 0:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 1:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 17:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-20 18:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 18:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-20 18:29 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 19:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-20 19:06 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 23:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-20 23:46 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 0:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-20 22:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 3:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-21 11:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 17:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-22 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-22 13:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-22 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-22 18:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-22 18:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-22 18:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-22 19:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-23 4:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-23 16:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-23 18:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-23 20:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-23 20:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-20 20:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 3:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-21 5:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 0:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 3:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-20 4:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 12:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-20 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-20 13:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 14:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-20 14:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-20 22:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 0:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 0:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 0:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 3:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-21 4:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 14:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 16:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-21 12:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 17:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-12-21 18:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 2:41 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 11:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 16:02 ` Boqun Feng
2022-12-21 17:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-12-21 19:33 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 19:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-12-21 20:19 ` Boqun Feng
2022-12-22 12:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-12-22 12:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221222121612.GA44777@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.