* + mm-hugetlb-fix-pte-marker-handling-in-hugetlb_change_protection.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
@ 2022-12-22 21:23 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2022-12-22 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, stable, peterx, muchun.song, mike.kravetz, linmiaohe,
david, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: mm/hugetlb: fix PTE marker handling in hugetlb_change_protection()
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-hugetlb-fix-pte-marker-handling-in-hugetlb_change_protection.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-hugetlb-fix-pte-marker-handling-in-hugetlb_change_protection.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/hugetlb: fix PTE marker handling in hugetlb_change_protection()
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:55:10 +0100
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: uffd-wp fixes for hugetlb_change_protection()".
Playing with virtio-mem and background snapshots (using uffd-wp) on
hugetlb in QEMU, I managed to trigger a VM_BUG_ON(). Looking into the
details, hugetlb_change_protection() seems to not handle uffd-wp correctly
in all cases.
Patch #1 fixes my test case. I don't have reproducers for patch #2, as it
requires running into migration entries.
I did not yet check in detail yet if !hugetlb code requires similar care.
This patch (of 2):
There are two problematic cases when stumbling over a PTE marker in
hugetlb_change_protection():
(1) We protect an uffd-wp PTE marker a second time using uffd-wp: we will
end up in the "!huge_pte_none(pte)" case and mess up the PTE marker.
(2) We unprotect a uffd-wp PTE marker: we will similarly end up in the
"!huge_pte_none(pte)" case even though we cleared the PTE, because
the "pte" variable is stale. We'll mess up the PTE marker.
For example, if we later stumble over such a "wrongly modified" PTE marker,
we'll treat it like a present PTE that maps some garbage page.
This can, for example, be triggered by mapping a memfd backed by huge
pages, registering uffd-wp, uffd-wp'ing an unmapped page and (a)
uffd-wp'ing it a second time; or (b) uffd-unprotecting it; or (c)
unregistering uffd-wp. Then, ff we trigger fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
on that file range, we will run into a VM_BUG_ON:
[ 195.039560] page:00000000ba1f2987 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x0
[ 195.039565] flags: 0x7ffffc0001000(reserved|node=0|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
[ 195.039568] raw: 0007ffffc0001000 ffffe742c0000008 ffffe742c0000008 0000000000000000
[ 195.039569] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[ 195.039569] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(compound && !PageHead(page))
[ 195.039573] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 195.039574] kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:1346!
[ 195.039579] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 195.039581] CPU: 7 PID: 4777 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 6.0.12-200.fc36.x86_64 #1
[ 195.039583] Hardware name: LENOVO 20WNS1F81N/20WNS1F81N, BIOS N35ET50W (1.50 ) 09/15/2022
[ 195.039584] RIP: 0010:page_remove_rmap+0x45b/0x550
[ 195.039588] Code: [...]
[ 195.039589] RSP: 0018:ffffbc03c3633ba8 EFLAGS: 00010292
[ 195.039591] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffffe742c0000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 195.039592] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff8e7aac1a RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[ 195.039592] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffbc03c3633a08
[ 195.039593] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff8f146328 R12: ffff9b04c42754b0
[ 195.039594] R13: ffffffff8fcc6328 R14: ffffbc03c3633c80 R15: ffff9b0484ab9100
[ 195.039595] FS: 00007fc7aaf68640(0000) GS:ffff9b0bbf7c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 195.039596] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 195.039597] CR2: 000055d402c49110 CR3: 0000000159392003 CR4: 0000000000772ee0
[ 195.039598] PKRU: 55555554
[ 195.039599] Call Trace:
[ 195.039600] <TASK>
[ 195.039602] __unmap_hugepage_range+0x33b/0x7d0
[ 195.039605] unmap_hugepage_range+0x55/0x70
[ 195.039608] hugetlb_vmdelete_list+0x77/0xa0
[ 195.039611] hugetlbfs_fallocate+0x410/0x550
[ 195.039612] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40
[ 195.039616] vfs_fallocate+0x12e/0x360
[ 195.039618] __x64_sys_fallocate+0x40/0x70
[ 195.039620] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
[ 195.039623] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
[ 195.039624] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 195.039626] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[ 195.039628] RIP: 0033:0x7fc7b590651f
[ 195.039653] Code: [...]
[ 195.039654] RSP: 002b:00007fc7aaf66e70 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000011d
[ 195.039655] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000558ef4b7f370 RCX: 00007fc7b590651f
[ 195.039656] RDX: 0000000018000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 000000000000000c
[ 195.039657] RBP: 0000000008000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000073
[ 195.039658] R10: 0000000008000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000018000000
[ 195.039658] R13: 00007fb8bbe00000 R14: 000000000000000c R15: 0000000000001000
[ 195.039661] </TASK>
Fix it by not going into the "!huge_pte_none(pte)" case if we stumble over
an exclusive marker. spin_unlock() + continue would get the job done.
However, instead, make it clearer that there are no fall-through
statements: we process each case (hwpoison, migration, marker, !none,
none) and then unlock the page table to continue with the next PTE. Let's
avoid "continue" statements and use a single spin_unlock() at the end.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222205511.675832-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222205511.675832-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: 60dfaad65aa9 ("mm/hugetlb: allow uffd wr-protect none ptes")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-fix-pte-marker-handling-in-hugetlb_change_protection
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6658,10 +6658,8 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(
}
pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte))) {
- spin_unlock(ptl);
- continue;
- }
- if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte))) {
+ /* Nothing to do. */
+ } else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte))) {
swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
struct page *page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry);
@@ -6682,18 +6680,13 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(
set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, newpte);
pages++;
}
- spin_unlock(ptl);
- continue;
- }
- if (unlikely(pte_marker_uffd_wp(pte))) {
- /*
- * This is changing a non-present pte into a none pte,
- * no need for huge_ptep_modify_prot_start/commit().
- */
+ } else if (unlikely(is_pte_marker(pte))) {
+ /* No other markers apply for now. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_marker_uffd_wp(pte));
if (uffd_wp_resolve)
+ /* Safe to modify directly (non-present->none). */
huge_pte_clear(mm, address, ptep, psize);
- }
- if (!huge_pte_none(pte)) {
+ } else if (!huge_pte_none(pte)) {
pte_t old_pte;
unsigned int shift = huge_page_shift(hstate_vma(vma));
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
mm-hugetlb-fix-pte-marker-handling-in-hugetlb_change_protection.patch
mm-hugetlb-fix-uffd-wp-handling-for-migration-entries-in-hugetlb_change_protection.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-12-22 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-22 21:23 + mm-hugetlb-fix-pte-marker-handling-in-hugetlb_change_protection.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.