From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: imx93-src: No need to set device_driver owner
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 13:29:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230101052953.GA6112@T480> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6Sab92tTDTk5Nox@qemulion>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:27:03PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
> device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
> takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
> module_platform_driver() helper function.
>
> Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Applied, thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: imx93-src: No need to set device_driver owner
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 13:29:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230101052953.GA6112@T480> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6Sab92tTDTk5Nox@qemulion>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:27:03PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
> device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
> takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
> module_platform_driver() helper function.
>
> Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Applied, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-01 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-22 17:57 [PATCH] soc: imx: imx93-src: No need to set device_driver owner Deepak R Varma
2022-12-22 17:57 ` Deepak R Varma
2023-01-01 5:29 ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2023-01-01 5:29 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230101052953.GA6112@T480 \
--to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=drv@mailo.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=ssengar@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.