All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 13:19:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106131934.14e7a900@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f408a8c-4e23-9de5-0ee8-5deccd901543@intel.com>

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 09:03:18 -0800 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > +static inline bool devl_is_registered(struct devlink *devlink)
> > +{
> > +	/* To prevent races the caller must hold the instance lock
> > +	 * or another lock taken during unregistration.
> > +	 */  
> 
> Why not just lockdep_assert here on the instance lock? I guess this
> comment implies that another lock could be used instead but it seems
> weird to allow that? I guess because of things like the linecards_lock
> as opposed to the instance lock?

Yup, as discussed on the RFC - removing the regions lock specifically 
is quite tricky.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06  6:33 [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:17   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:41   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:03   ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 21:19     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-07  9:05       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:42   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:43   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:55   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:22     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:20       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10  0:21       ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-10 16:35         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 20:22           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11  9:32             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 16:45               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 21:29                 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-12  7:07                   ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 14:59                     ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:58                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13  7:50                         ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-15  8:35                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-16 10:33                             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-16 11:25                               ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 19:20                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-12 20:09                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 22:44                         ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-13  6:45                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13  7:53                             ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 13:21   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:56   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06  6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 15:49   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:06 ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230106131934.14e7a900@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.