From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:20:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230112112021.0ff88cdb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7+xv6gKaU+Horrk@unreal>
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:07:43 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> As a user, I don't want to see any late dynamic object addition which is
> not triggered by me explicitly. As it doesn't make any sense to add
> various delays per-vendor/kernel in configuration scripts just because
> not everything is ready. Users need predictability, lazy addition of
> objects adds chaos instead.
>
> Agree with Jakub, it is anti-pattern.
To be clear my preference would be to always construct the three from
the root. Register the main instance, then sub-objects. I mean - you
tried forcing the opposite order and it only succeeded in 90-something
percent of cases. There's always special cases.
I don't understand your concern about user experience here. We have
notifications for each sub-object. Plus I think drivers should hold
the instance lock throughout the probe routine. I don't see a scenario
in which registering the main instance first would lead to retry/sleep
hacks in user space, do you? I'm talking about devlink and the subobjs
we have specifically.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 6:33 [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:03 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 21:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 0:21 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-10 16:35 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 20:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 9:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 16:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 21:29 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-12 7:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 14:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13 7:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-15 8:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-16 10:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-16 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 19:20 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-12 20:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 22:44 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-13 6:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13 7:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 13:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:06 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230112112021.0ff88cdb@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.