* + mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-01-09 23:44 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-01-09 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, willy, vbabka, thierry.reding, neilb, mhocko, mgorman,
akpm
The patch titled
Subject: mm/page_alloc: rename ALLOC_HIGH to ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: rename ALLOC_HIGH to ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:16:25 +0000
Patch series "Discard __GFP_ATOMIC", v2.
Neil's patch was residing in mm-unstable as commit 2fafb4fe8f7a ("mm:
discard __GFP_ATOMIC") for a long time and recently brought up again.
Most recently, I was worried that __GFP_HIGH allocations could use
high-order atomic reserves which is unintentional but there was no
response so lets revisit -- this series reworks how min reserves are used,
protects highorder reserves and then finishes with Neil's patch with very
minor modifications so it fits on top.
There was a review discussion on renaming __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM to
__GFP_ALLOW_BLOCKING but I didn't think it was that big an issue and is
ortogonal to the removal of __GFP_ATOMIC.
There were some concerns about how the gfp flags affect the min reserves
but it never reached a solid conclusion so I made my own attempt.
The series tries to iron out some of the details on how reserves are used.
ALLOC_HIGH becomes ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE and ALLOC_HARDER becomes
ALLOC_NON_BLOCK and documents how the reserves are affected. For example,
ALLOC_NON_BLOCK (no direct reclaim) on its own allows 25% of the min
reserve. ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE (__GFP_HIGH) allows 50% and both combined
allows deeper access again. ALLOC_OOM allows access to 75%.
High-order atomic allocations are explicitly handled with the caveat that
no __GFP_ATOMIC flag means that any high-order allocation that specifies
GFP_HIGH and cannot enter direct reclaim will be treated as if it was
GFP_ATOMIC.
This patch (of 7):
__GFP_HIGH aliases to ALLOC_HIGH but the name does not really hint what it
means. As ALLOC_HIGH is internal to the allocator, rename it to
ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE to document that the min reserves can be depleted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230109151631.24923-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230109151631.24923-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/internal.h | 4 +++-
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/internal.h~mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve
+++ a/mm/internal.h
@@ -761,7 +761,9 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_li
#endif
#define ALLOC_HARDER 0x10 /* try to alloc harder */
-#define ALLOC_HIGH 0x20 /* __GFP_HIGH set */
+#define ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE 0x20 /* __GFP_HIGH set. Allow access to 50%
+ * of the min watermark.
+ */
#define ALLOC_CPUSET 0x40 /* check for correct cpuset */
#define ALLOC_CMA 0x80 /* allow allocations from CMA areas */
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3991,7 +3991,7 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z,
/* free_pages may go negative - that's OK */
free_pages -= __zone_watermark_unusable_free(z, order, alloc_flags);
- if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGH)
+ if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE)
min -= min / 2;
if (unlikely(alloc_harder)) {
@@ -4833,18 +4833,18 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
unsigned int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_MIN | ALLOC_CPUSET;
/*
- * __GFP_HIGH is assumed to be the same as ALLOC_HIGH
+ * __GFP_HIGH is assumed to be the same as ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE
* and __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM is assumed to be the same as ALLOC_KSWAPD
* to save two branches.
*/
- BUILD_BUG_ON(__GFP_HIGH != (__force gfp_t) ALLOC_HIGH);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(__GFP_HIGH != (__force gfp_t) ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE);
BUILD_BUG_ON(__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM != (__force gfp_t) ALLOC_KSWAPD);
/*
* The caller may dip into page reserves a bit more if the caller
* cannot run direct reclaim, or if the caller has realtime scheduling
* policy or is asking for __GFP_HIGH memory. GFP_ATOMIC requests will
- * set both ALLOC_HARDER (__GFP_ATOMIC) and ALLOC_HIGH (__GFP_HIGH).
+ * set both ALLOC_HARDER (__GFP_ATOMIC) and ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE(__GFP_HIGH).
*/
alloc_flags |= (__force int)
(gfp_mask & (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM));
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mgorman@techsingularity.net are
mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch
mm-page_alloc-treat-rt-tasks-similar-to-__gfp_high.patch
mm-page_alloc-explicitly-record-high-order-atomic-allocations-in-alloc_flags.patch
mm-page_alloc-explicitly-define-what-alloc-flags-deplete-min-reserves.patch
mm-page_allocc-allow-__gfp_nofail-requests-deeper-access-to-reserves.patch
mm-page_alloc-give-gfp_atomic-and-non-blocking-allocations-access-to-reserves.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* + mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2023-01-14 4:40 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2023-01-14 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, willy, vbabka, thierry.reding, neilb, mhocko, mgorman,
akpm
The patch titled
Subject: mm/page_alloc: rename ALLOC_HIGH to ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: rename ALLOC_HIGH to ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:12:12 +0000
Patch series "Discard __GFP_ATOMIC", v3.
Neil's patch has been residing in mm-unstable as commit 2fafb4fe8f7a ("mm:
discard __GFP_ATOMIC") for a long time and recently brought up again.
Most recently, I was worried that __GFP_HIGH allocations could use
high-order atomic reserves which is unintentional but there was no
response so lets revisit -- this series reworks how min reserves are used,
protects highorder reserves and then finishes with Neil's patch with very
minor modifications so it fits on top.
There was a review discussion on renaming __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM to
__GFP_ALLOW_BLOCKING but I didn't think it was that big an issue and is
orthogonal to the removal of __GFP_ATOMIC.
There were some concerns about how the gfp flags affect the min reserves
but it never reached a solid conclusion so I made my own attempt.
The series tries to iron out some of the details on how reserves are used.
ALLOC_HIGH becomes ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE and ALLOC_HARDER becomes
ALLOC_NON_BLOCK and documents how the reserves are affected. For example,
ALLOC_NON_BLOCK (no direct reclaim) on its own allows 25% of the min
reserve. ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE (__GFP_HIGH) allows 50% and both combined
allows deeper access again. ALLOC_OOM allows access to 75%.
High-order atomic allocations are explicitly handled with the caveat that
no __GFP_ATOMIC flag means that any high-order allocation that specifies
GFP_HIGH and cannot enter direct reclaim will be treated as if it was
GFP_ATOMIC.
This patch (of 6):
__GFP_HIGH aliases to ALLOC_HIGH but the name does not really hint what it
means. As ALLOC_HIGH is internal to the allocator, rename it to
ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE to document that the min reserves can be depleted.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230113111217.14134-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230113111217.14134-2-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
--- a/mm/internal.h~mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve
+++ a/mm/internal.h
@@ -779,7 +779,9 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_li
#endif
#define ALLOC_HARDER 0x10 /* try to alloc harder */
-#define ALLOC_HIGH 0x20 /* __GFP_HIGH set */
+#define ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE 0x20 /* __GFP_HIGH set. Allow access to 50%
+ * of the min watermark.
+ */
#define ALLOC_CPUSET 0x40 /* check for correct cpuset */
#define ALLOC_CMA 0x80 /* allow allocations from CMA areas */
#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3994,7 +3994,7 @@ bool __zone_watermark_ok(struct zone *z,
/* free_pages may go negative - that's OK */
free_pages -= __zone_watermark_unusable_free(z, order, alloc_flags);
- if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_HIGH)
+ if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE)
min -= min / 2;
if (unlikely(alloc_harder)) {
@@ -4836,18 +4836,18 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
unsigned int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_MIN | ALLOC_CPUSET;
/*
- * __GFP_HIGH is assumed to be the same as ALLOC_HIGH
+ * __GFP_HIGH is assumed to be the same as ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE
* and __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM is assumed to be the same as ALLOC_KSWAPD
* to save two branches.
*/
- BUILD_BUG_ON(__GFP_HIGH != (__force gfp_t) ALLOC_HIGH);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(__GFP_HIGH != (__force gfp_t) ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE);
BUILD_BUG_ON(__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM != (__force gfp_t) ALLOC_KSWAPD);
/*
* The caller may dip into page reserves a bit more if the caller
* cannot run direct reclaim, or if the caller has realtime scheduling
* policy or is asking for __GFP_HIGH memory. GFP_ATOMIC requests will
- * set both ALLOC_HARDER (__GFP_ATOMIC) and ALLOC_HIGH (__GFP_HIGH).
+ * set both ALLOC_HARDER (__GFP_ATOMIC) and ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE(__GFP_HIGH).
*/
alloc_flags |= (__force int)
(gfp_mask & (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM));
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from mgorman@techsingularity.net are
mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch
mm-page_alloc-treat-rt-tasks-similar-to-__gfp_high.patch
mm-page_alloc-explicitly-record-high-order-atomic-allocations-in-alloc_flags.patch
mm-page_alloc-explicitly-define-what-alloc-flags-deplete-min-reserves.patch
mm-page_alloc-explicitly-define-how-__gfp_high-non-blocking-allocations-accesses-reserves.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-14 4:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-09 23:44 + mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_high-to-alloc_min_reserve.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-14 4:40 Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.